so much for motherly instinctHer surname is correct for sure.
Ah, the “boyfriend.” These women will do anything to protect some loser who is not even the child’s father, does nothing to help them or the child, and is generally the first one to look for in child molestation cases.
No doubt her boyfriend had some influence. If she had an ounce of sense, she would get rid of him, too.
File endangerment of a child charges and filing a false police report on the mother against the mother and aggravated assault with a deadly weapon against the boyfriend which they’ll reduce down because it’s not intentional but at least it will give them a good scare...
so much for motherly instinctI love animals, but you can be sure that if my child ever were seriously injured by one, I’d put a bullet in it myself.
Reminds me of the women who pick their BF’s over their children in abuse cases.
Also makes me ashamed to be a Looney! No, makes me ashamed they are Looney’s.
There is no excuse for not putting the safety of your child first. This woman was likely either afraid of upsetting her mother (and perhaps losing “free” babysitting services) or she and the mother both could be afraid of the boyfriend. More unthinkable—she could have been more concerned about the welfare of the dog than her own child.
Ah yes a pit bull... The preferred dog of the criminal class.
How many innocent people need to be savagely mauled by these *cough* loving family pets before the public wakes up and demands that this breed be made extinct? As far as I’m concerned, a good pit bull is a dead pit bull.
Her boyfriend may have threatened her. If he’s a real bad news type, she may have thought she was better off not p***ing him off about his dog.