Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Photon interaction breakthrough
piercepioneer.com ^ | 11-3-14 | Deborah Grace

Posted on 11/03/2014 5:56:03 PM PST by BenLurkin

Photons generally do not interact with each other in free space but instead one passes through the other with no effect to either one. Vienna University of Technology researchers have made a significant and groundbreaking discovery in the field of quantum mechanics. A team of researchers has developed some unique hardware, which enable photons to interact. This hardware is composed of micro-thin fiber made of glass, which in turn attached to a device called a resonator.

The photon particle light can enter the resonator, moves in a circular fashion and then returns to the glass fiber. This change in pathways causes a phase inversion of 180 degrees. The researchers then attached a rubidium atom to the resonator preventing light form [sic] entering the resonator thereby preventing the oscillation phase of the proton from changing.

“It is like a pendulum, which should actually swing to the left, but due to coupling with a second pendulum, it swings to the right. There cannot be more extreme change in the pendulum’s condition”, said Professor Arno Rauschenbeutel, of Institute of Atomic and Subatomic Physics, TU Wien.

(Excerpt) Read more at piercepioneer.com ...


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: light; photons; quantummechanics; stringtheory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: BenLurkin; 6SJ7; AdmSmith; AFPhys; Arkinsaw; allmost; aristotleman; autumnraine; ...


· List topics · post a topic · subscribe · Google ·

21 posted on 11/03/2014 11:15:03 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reed13k; NonValueAdded; Cherokee Conservative; OneWingedShark
"Sounds like they’re crossing the beams - isn’t that bad?"


22 posted on 11/04/2014 5:53:56 AM PST by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BroJoeK

“Yes, it’s true, that man has no *ick.”


23 posted on 11/04/2014 5:58:08 AM PST by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
God bless that movie if for no other reason than it's probably the last one Hollywood made in which they had the balls to make the EPA the bad guy. Also bless the movie for Sigourney Weaver.

The researchers then attached a rubidium atom to the resonator preventing light form [sic] entering the resonator thereby preventing the oscillation phase of the proton from changing. - Shouldn't that be "photon"? Article would be more convincing if it didn't require sic-ing twice in the same sentence.

24 posted on 11/04/2014 6:06:40 AM PST by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: BroJoeK

LOL - excellent


25 posted on 11/04/2014 7:31:24 AM PST by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary for good men to do nothings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dr_lew
To what end, I can't really say, because to me the whole idea of gaining control over the quantum realm is fundamentally hopeless, since it is axiomatic in Quantum Theory itself that this will not happen, as expressed by Quantum Uncertainty.

Thought you might find this theory interesting.

https://journals.aps.org/prx/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevX.4.041013

26 posted on 11/04/2014 7:48:17 AM PST by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
Thanks for the link, but I am out of sympathy with such projects.

I feel ones time might be more fruitfully spent perusing Herzberg, Atomic Spectra and Atomic Structure (1937)

27 posted on 11/04/2014 3:03:08 PM PST by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: dr_lew

On this election night, I’m feeling really cranked on about QM. I would just like to comment on the singlet and triplet spectroscopic states as per Herzberg, pg.75.

Traditionally, these are explained as spin 1/2 electrons being aligned or anti-aligned, to form spin 1 or spin 0 states, but this heuristic doesn’t really wash.

There are 2 X 2 = 4 states of the two electrons, represented as |++> , |+-> , |-+> , |—> in Dirac’s “bra - ket” notation, named for the inner product “bracket” notation, e.g. <+-|++> = 0 .

The “bra” is the dual of the “ket”, and their inner product represents a probability of finding the system in both states simultaneously. ( The ket is, I believe, the punning basis for Schroedinger’s cat. )

But there are two anti-aligned states, and they resolve into the triplet and the singlet thus:

triplet: |++> , |+-> + |+-> , |—>
singlet: |+-> - |-+>

So, there are TWO anti-aligned states: the spin 1 state with z-component 0, and the spin 0 state.

This defies heuristic explanation, except that the singlet is antisymmetric under exchange, and the Lz=0 triplet state is symmetric. It all works out beautifully. Learn to love it.

This is almost literally, the ABCs or 1+1=2, of atomic QM. It stands as rock.


28 posted on 11/04/2014 8:05:46 PM PST by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson