In Chicago, a Voting Machine Was Pre-Wired… to Vote for DEMOCRATS ONLY! (Must Read)

The Political Insider ^ | 20/23/2014 | Editor

[Beave Meister]

Any student of American politics is familiar with just how corrupt politics are in Chicago, Illinois. It is widely believed, for example, that without the mafia’s influence in the area, John F. Kennedy would have never been elected President.

But today, voter fraud has to be done on a high-tech, digital level. Because computers can be reprogrammed, learning about a machine that REQUIRES you to vote for Democrats is chilling.

Below is Republican State House candidate Jim Moynihan’s description of what it was like trying to vote for himself in early elections… Only to see the final vote be placed for his Democratic opponent:

While using a touch screen voting machine in Schaumburg, Moynihan voted for several races on the ballot, only to find that whenever he voted for a Republican candidate, the machine registered the vote for a Democrat in the same race. He notified the election judge at his polling place and demonstrated that it continued to cast a vote for the opposing candidate’s party. Moynihan was eventually allowed to vote for Republican candidates, including his own race.

[Beave Meister]

An ID card becomes irrelevant when you have this working for you.

[Diogenesis]

DO”J” approved.

Their focus under Holder is solely
on increasing Election Fraud — when not going after
white people and non-Moslems by their racial profiling.

[GeronL]

No charges will be filed and no DoJ INVESTIGATION ... right?

[arthurus]

Chicago is coarser than other cities. In other cities the programming will be more delicate and not display the Democrat Votes that are registered when someone votes Republican. Republican votes will be properly displayed even as Democrat votes are tallied.

[RIghtwardHo]

I will say it over and over ... voter fraud is a MISDIRECT. The problem is election fraud. Voter fraud is insignificant and inefficient. Changing computer code? Well. There goes the Republic forever.

What upsets me is that most GOPers scream voter fraud and say NOTHING about this. Makes me wonder whose side they are on.

[Robert A Cook PE]

So why are the so very, very afraid of voter ID anywhere?

And, of course, Obola’s ABCNNBCBS press corpse doesn’t care.

[oldbrowser]

No charges will be filed and no DoJ INVESTIGATION ... right?

Just an innocent mistake, no need to check the rest of the machines or make a federal case out of it.

[SkyDancer]

Just like Iraq under Saddam ... 100% vote for the incumbent. And nobody will be held accountable ... an honest mistake.

[bk1000]

“No charges will be filed and no DoJ INVESTIGATION ... right?”

You are most likely correct, but the entire election should be declared null and void at the revelation of this fraud. The fact that the public will accept this as an isolated and unintentional accident is indeed sad.

[GrandJediMasterYoda]

They're pulling the same crap again just like the Kenyans "reelection" and of course the RINO party will do absolutely nothing about it.

"Oh I am SO surprised I won! Oh boo hoo hoo! Yes Mr. Putin, WHEN I get reelected..."

[DJ MacWoW]

Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can

[FlingWingFlyer]

Thanks to the DemocRATS, there is no such thing as a fair election in America anymore. But hey! Corrupt, fraudulent elections are the only way they can win.

[al baby]

DIE BOLD and Park o meter

[cherry]

I always wonder how one knows that their mail in ballot was properly put thru the machine, or put thru the machine at all, or if the ballot has already been adjusted to make you think you're voting one way when in fact, the candidates names have been reversed....

we're in a no win situation no matter what...

[boycott]

Imagine how often this happens and no one ever knows of it. Thankfully, this man caught them stealing an election.

My guess is that Obama and the democrats received a lot of these type votes in 2012.

[bigbob]

“pre-wired”??? More techno-ignorance from the useless media

[Whenifhow]

1:51 Minutes
Illinois Candidate Says Voting Machine Switched His Ballot

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGtUoq-uGQ4

[pieceofthepuzzle]

The only way electronic voting can be made relatively ‘safe’ IMHO is if each voter is issued a randomly generated personal alphanumeric code (e.g. AQ351!) that is printed for them in the booth. When the election is over and the votes are tallied, each vote for each candidate - and the corresponding personal alphanumeric code associated with that vote - would have to be made immediately public - both in paper form, and online.

The online version would be searchable, by your personal alphanumeric code - and you could then verify that your vote was actually given to the person you voted for. The paper version of the data would be for cross-referencing and would help assure that the online data was not tampered with. No personal information would be associated with the randomly generated personal code you were given, and obviously the code that you received would be different for each election that you voted in.

Combine this approach with a national ID card and I think things would be a lot more trustable.

[CPT Clay]

Get an Injuction on them ALL

[pieceofthepuzzle]

Obviously the random code generation would have to be set up such that identical codes wouldn’t be generated for any single election.