Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Couple Fined For Refusing To Host Gay Wedding Shuts Down Venue
Daily Caller ^ | 08/29/2014 | Rachel Stoltzfoos

Posted on 08/29/2014 3:47:45 PM PDT by Rusty0604

A Christian couple fined $13,000 for refusing to host a lesbian wedding on their New York farm has decided to close the venue rather than violate their religious beliefs.

Cynthia and Robert Gifford decided not to host ceremonies anymore, other than those already scheduled, Alliance Defending Freedom attorney James Trainor told The Blaze. ”Since the order essentially compelled them to do all ceremonies or none at all, they have chosen the latter in order to stay true to their religious convictions, even though it will likely hurt their business in the short run,” he said

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: Religion
KEYWORDS: commisarcuomo; gaymafia; homosexualagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last
To: ROCKLOBSTER
You claimed that marriage is not a right. That is clearly not the case.

Instead of taking things underground, I would suggest a legal confrontation with someone besides shopped judges.

And working at the state legislature to clarify the law.

I don't like sneaking around like a coward to cheat my way to what is right.

I like a direct approach.

I'm sure you've noticed that. Shyness is not a virtue for me.

Be loud, be proud. Don't cower.

/johnny

81 posted on 08/29/2014 6:19:02 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

If a marriage were a legal right, no license would be required.

It isn’t absolute, the churches lay it out. You can’t marry your close family, you can’t marry the same sex, you can’t marry animals, you can’t marry inanimate objects.

The state has no legitimate role in marriage, they are simply wedging their way in to exact control. A legal marriage invites the DHHS and the courts into your lives.

With Holy Matrimony, there is no “sneaking around”...the marriage is done before God, and the rules of man are secondary.


82 posted on 08/29/2014 6:31:53 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves" Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER
No license is required.

Who issued a license to Adam and Eve?

It is a right.

States and churches may have licensed it.

But marriage is only between one man and one woman. That's been the definition since antiquity.

/johnny

83 posted on 08/29/2014 6:35:27 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER
This couple, and others like them, should INVITE certain religious couples to have the ceremony at their farm, and invite all their guests to a PRIVATE wedding.

The word would get out, preachers would recommend them, and life could continue. (donations would be accepted of course.)

This is what I call sneaking around like a coward.

Be loud. Be proud. Be arrogant.

But don't sneak. Take the fight to them.

/johnny

84 posted on 08/29/2014 6:37:57 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Meanwhile, Jews and Christians are ......


85 posted on 08/29/2014 6:38:48 PM PDT by SkyDancer (I Was Told Nobody Is Perfect But Yet, Here I Am)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER
I realize that it's easier for me, here in a conservative state, with my kidz grown and gone, and living alone to flip the bird at the government overlord than it is for you guys in the liberal northeast corridor. Especially when you have jobs and cars and food and stuff to worry about.

It's easier for some to tell government to get stuffed, knowing the possible consequences.

It's not like they can kill me more than once, and they can't eat me. I'm all gristle.

/johnny

86 posted on 08/29/2014 6:42:21 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Welcome to the 1964 Civil Rights act in action.


87 posted on 08/29/2014 6:50:54 PM PDT by Chickensoup (Leftist totalitarian fascism is on the move.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Springfield Reformer

That is wisdom. Wise as serpents, harmless as doves


88 posted on 08/29/2014 6:51:54 PM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Why do you think the government can tell businesses and clubs they must serve everyone, no smoking, etc etc etc.

Do you know what a “public place” is?

Here, I’ll tell you:

“Public place” means any enclosed indoor area used by the general public or serving as a place of work containing two hundred fifty or more square feet of floor space, including, but not limited to, all restaurants with a seating capacity greater than fifty, all retail stores, lobbies and malls, offices, including waiting rooms, and other commercial establishments; public conveyances with departures, travel, and destination entirely within this state; educational facilities; hospitals, clinics, nursing homes, and other health care and medical facilities; and auditoriums, elevators, theaters, libraries, art museums, concert halls, indoor arenas, and meeting rooms.

>> Be loud. Be proud. Be arrogant...But don’t sneak. Take the fight to them.<<

Fight that.


89 posted on 08/29/2014 6:54:46 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves" Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER
What law are you quoting? Context is everything. Is it State or Federal?

Yes, I know what a public place is.

Federal government can't tell business squat. They don't have a mandate to. State governments might. And that can be addressed.

But it has to go to the right level, and it has to have a rational plan of attack.

Arm waving about rights doesn't cut it. But it can help to distract and waste their money.

/johnny

90 posted on 08/29/2014 7:01:44 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER
I'm perfectly proud to fight that. At the state house or the federal court level.

It takes gumption, and not sneaking around, trying to get around their limits.

And time, and money, and effort.

Sometimes, all it takes is a middle finger and doing as you damn well please.

/johnny

91 posted on 08/29/2014 7:04:03 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

You’ll need to look up “public places” in your own state’s statutes to find the applicable definition, but I’ll bet your fight is already lost.

That is how the queer mafia is assaulting these private businesses.

As far as I’m concerned, if somebody has a deed, and is paying taxes on a piece of property....it IS NOT a public place. And if the government want to call it a “public accommodation” they should damn straight make it tax exempt.

On the other hand, any government owned building or open space, or entity that is government subsidized IS a public place.

But that’s not the way it is.

And what I suggested (making it be unquestionably private) IS NOT “sneaking around” it’s doing what you damn well please on your own private property.


92 posted on 08/29/2014 7:21:03 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves" Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER
but I’ll bet your fight is already lost.

Only for a wuss.

If it's a state thing, you can sit up there in the state capitol building and buttonhole the folks that make those laws.

They can be changed.

We're doing it here in Texas.

It's boring work, with no renumeration, but it can be done.

You want to 'back-door' the situation. I seek to confront it head on, damn the government (State or Federal) and let the chips fall where they may.

Not a solution for those seeking a comfortable retirement.

And that generally decides things.

/johnny

93 posted on 08/29/2014 7:31:50 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER
I like your idea of demanding tax exemption for public accommodation. That hits them in the budget. And that, they do not like. Not at all.

I may try that or suggest that here locally.

/johnny

94 posted on 08/29/2014 7:34:08 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The Germans of the Weimar/Nazi period had already been disarmed. When will they get that done here? And how, exactly?

Maybe I should use a different word than Reichstag. To me, it is not about Germany. It simply means any government manufactured incident, that lets the government think they can do anything. It could be an economic collapse, a whole bunch of Sandy Hooks. It could be anything. The government is probably looking for an incident(s) to try to take all the weapons away. How successful they will be, and how fiercely the people resist them, is another issue. The government will never stop trying to disarm the people. We just need to keep the government at bay, as far into the future as possible.

95 posted on 08/29/2014 7:50:48 PM PDT by Mark17 (Obama & Nero? Both Emperors. The difference is Nero played a fiddle, while Obama plays a "flute")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman

How far down?


96 posted on 08/29/2014 8:00:11 PM PDT by x_plus_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: utford
pizz, whine and moan... but no legal action i know of
97 posted on 08/29/2014 8:01:07 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -vvv- NO Pity for the LAZY - 86-44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

“Whatever happened to the signs which read:

“WE RESERVE THE RIGHT TO REFUSE SERVICE TO ANYONE”

?????”

Those signs were BS since the Civil Rights Act. That eliminated the right of business owners to refuse service to racial/religious minorities. Nobody owns a business anymore, you are just allowed to have one by the government as long as you follow the rules.


98 posted on 08/29/2014 8:14:51 PM PDT by BurningOak (Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

The Supreme Court established marriage as a right in Loving vs Virginia. I agree with the ruling (as does anyone else who is not a member of KKK or black panthers). Redefinition of marriage is another story.


99 posted on 08/29/2014 8:18:20 PM PDT by BurningOak (Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Reliance on the laws of man to define an institution of God is as foolish as anything can get.


100 posted on 08/29/2014 8:54:44 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson