It’s flat out murder.
He “chose”.
I mean...it’s a CHOICE, right..?
Shervaughn - not an Amish sounding name
It’s a baby only if you decide it’s a baby.
Such is the deranged rationale of “choicers.”
This happened on an episode of law & order too.
sure was in the Dr office a long time
Just playing devil’s advocate. If an unborn child is not a living entity until it’s born, how can this be murder? There have been cases where a pregnant woman is murdered and the killer is charged with double homicide. Either it is or it isn’t. Sorry if this is a weak argument.
Sick.
Why shouldn’t the man have a say in whether the baby gets murdered??? They wouldn’t want me on that jury...
The DA will twist and contort to make clear that this guy did not kill a baby. Otherwise, why would it be OK for the woman to do THE SAME THING with no consequence while if he did it, its murder.
hey he is just exercising his choice to be a dad. why just allow moms to murder their preborn babies?
Son, it’s all fun and games until the girlfriend starts mixing saltpeter into your grub. Or perhaps worse, overdosing you on Viagra.
The argument would be that he had no right to do this because the choice is hers and hers alone. It’s her body. It’s her decision if she wanted to give birth or kill her baby.
It’s murder either way, but that’s what the charge will be based on.
the stillborn birth
_________________________________
Now that’s an interesting turn of phrase..
is that how the court transcript reads ???
We all knew when they made this drug so accessible that this was going to happen. Bad for babies, bucks for lawyers.
The fact he was charged with “felony abortion” and not murder or manslaughter demonstrates completely the mindset of not only those involved but of the New York justice system (and really if the entire nation’s rule of law).
In other words, his crime isn’t that he killed a baby, rather that he took the choice to do the same away from the woman.
It’s only a woman’s right to kill a baby in this country. When a man chooses to do the same exact thing, exactly the same way (without the woman’s consent) it’s “felony abortion” because really, no actual “human life” was taken here (in the minds of the leftists in charge), rather only a woman’s right to choose was violated.
So to ask the question , “Why is it murder in this case but not when a woman does it” means nothing to a pro-”choice” advocate. Because what I wrote above is exactly how they view this situation.
It’s why the charge of “felony abortion” exists in the first place (instead of infanticide): to make it clear it isn’t “murder” when a man chooses to abort a baby, it’s about violating the “right’’ of a woman to “choose”.