Just playing devil’s advocate. If an unborn child is not a living entity until it’s born, how can this be murder? There have been cases where a pregnant woman is murdered and the killer is charged with double homicide. Either it is or it isn’t. Sorry if this is a weak argument.
“Just playing devil’s advocate. If an unborn child is not a living entity until it’s born, how can this be murder? There have been cases where a pregnant woman is murdered and the killer is charged with double homicide. Either it is or it isn’t. Sorry if this is a weak argument.”
I don’t thing it’s a weak argument at all. The drug was invented to kill the baby, It’s it’s promoted and marketed to kill the baby.
How can it be murder if one sex uses it and not another?
If it’s a prescription drug, that makes it illegal, but not og murder...
They offered to let him cop plead guilty to a lesser charge to avoid the “equal protection” problem. Glad he didn’t take it.
exactly. libtard pretzel logic - ie hypocrisy. ties em up in knots.
It is a weak argument.
Logic is not the strong suit of supporters of abortion or liberals in general.
If he causes the abortion, it's murder. If she causes the abortion it's just a lifestyle choice.
Inconsistent application of the law is one of the things that breeds contempt for same.
Personally, I think it's murder in either case.
The biggest problem with prosecuting this kind of crime IMO, is the there is such a thing as 'spontaneous abortion', which is essentially an act of God. This case would be easily provable not to be. There are edge cases though, where that is not the case. That's the only problem I have with making abortion a criminal act. If it were ever made so, I'd hate to see innocent people prosecuted for an act of God.
That’s why these cases should be prosecuted to the max, both in the media and in the court. Take the bloody contradiction and fling it in the eyes of the abortion enthusiasts.