Posted on 02/04/2014 6:23:18 AM PST by GregNH
...1. A (FORGED) birth certificate is on file with the Department of Health indicating that Barack Hussein Obama, II was born in Honolulu, Hawaii.....
Very carefully threading the needle, aren’t you?
The birth record would show “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth”. Would the record include the hand written “notations” Abercrombie refers to?
Since the WHLFBC contains information about the hospital and the attending physician (items which also were verified as 'matching' the original birth certificate on file) the presumption is clearly that the birth information came from the hospital.
When people get copies of their b.c.'s, there is nothing ever indicating who initially submitted the information to the vital records office. That the record exists and is maintained as part of the vital records system suffices to establish its bona fides.
That's how vital records work.
>> Actually, the COLB was “official” in that it’s the document Hawaii issues for use for things like drivers’ licenses, etc.
Any COLB produced by Hawaii was never presented to any court or election official.
“I’ve got chunks of guys like you in my stool!” Phil Hartman as Frank Sinatra on Saturday Night Live.
I didn’t think it would come to this, but enough is enough. You’re about the nine hundred and tenth Obama disinformation agent to adorn the auspicious pages of FR.
Obama will be revealed for the confederate that he is (further).
Nice try David.
1. A birth certificate is on file with the Department of Health indicating that Barack Hussein Obama, II was born in Honolulu, Hawaii
If one is sitting down to write a sentence to note 1) a birth certificate exists, 2) it is in our Dept of Health files, 3) it pertains to B.H.O. II, and 4) and it lists his place of birth as Honolulu, Hawaii how would you write it? How else was Onaka to phrase it?
Like I said, it's simple, direct and conveys those 4 points.
Obots are like zombies on a mission.
only thing simple and direct is you are an obot troll.
The attending physician was not verified as "matching"
Say Crook, how Hawaiian "vital records" really work is that they would or still do, take any "witness(es)" - LoL - "secure" from sourc(es), about a Hawaiian birth to produce record(s) or amendment(s) at anytime for their so-called vital records.
The BC doesn’t matter anymore!
THAT is the most reassuring statement issued to date, that- the CCP and possibly others, have finally obtained irrefutable evidence of Obama’s totally fictitious narrative.
It takes a man 81 years old, going on 82, to do it!!!
I have no need to thread anything here. I contend the essential question:
"What Barack Obama born in Hawaii?"
was verified in the affirmative point-blank by the Hawaii Dept. of Health:
[I] verify the following:
1. A birth certificate is on file with the Department of Health indicating that Barack Hussein Obama, II was born in Honolulu, Hawaii.
Now I know you and others aren't going to say "OK, that settles the question." I'm merely pointing out here why pretty much everyone else on this planet will read that to in fact settle the question (at least in our legal, Full Faith & Credit system where every state attests to its records and that is then given accord by all others).
The birth record would show the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. Would the record include the hand written notations Abercrombie refers to?
Yes. That's one reason perhaps why Onaka used the words "matches the information" rather than "true and complete copy" as the Hawaiian original contains medical or other information that can't and wasn't released with the White House version.
That Dr. Onaka verified Obama's Hawaiian birth is highly relevant as to the eligibility question. Whether Dr. Onaka verified each and every other tidbit of information on the BC is irrelevant as none of that other stuff bears in the least on the eligibility question.
Yeah, Obama has always struck me as a Jefferson Davis sort of dude.
I commend you on yet another excellent post.
No Crook, playing dumb as usual, Onaka “verified” what he had on record. He did not verify if the record(s) are accurate. LoL. In Obama’s case, his BS “vital records” could have come from anywhere.
What you contend is the “essential question” is a partial question.
Also, as has been thoroughly discussed on FR, “matching” does not imply completeness. Half-truths support a lie.
The only record produced by Hawaii is Onaka’s verification letter.
But hardcopy documents and electronic documents are two entirely different things as far as the expertise involved. To say Hayes would qualify to testify as to the latter because he was termed a "document expert" when he was looking at handwriting issues is like saying an electrical engineer can testify as to a bridge collapse because he once qualified as an "engineer."
Again, this is all entirely academic as Zullo has demonstrated he has no intention on using Hayes at all, let alone pursuing any type of criminal or civil case.
Evidently the request came from this guy, not Zullo or Arpaijo directly.....
The Rev. Dr. Carl Gallups, M.Div. ppsimmons Radio Ministry http://www.carlgallups.com WEBY 1330 a.m. Freedom Friday
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.