Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: rolling_stone
It doesn’t affirm who submitted the information or when and if it was verified.

Since the WHLFBC contains information about the hospital and the attending physician (items which also were verified as 'matching' the original birth certificate on file) the presumption is clearly that the birth information came from the hospital.

When people get copies of their b.c.'s, there is nothing ever indicating who initially submitted the information to the vital records office. That the record exists and is maintained as part of the vital records system suffices to establish its bona fides.

That's how vital records work.

203 posted on 02/04/2014 12:59:27 PM PST by CpnHook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]


To: CpnHook
>> Since the WHLFBC contains information about the hospital and the attending physician (items which also were verified as 'matching' the original birth certificate on file)...

The attending physician was not verified as "matching"

209 posted on 02/04/2014 1:10:12 PM PST by Ray76 (How modern liberals think: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaE98w1KZ-c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies ]

To: CpnHook
That's how vital records work.

Say Crook, how Hawaiian "vital records" really work is that they would or still do, take any "witness(es)" - LoL - "secure" from sourc(es), about a Hawaiian birth to produce record(s) or amendment(s) at anytime for their so-called vital records.

211 posted on 02/04/2014 1:16:26 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson