Posted on 01/15/2014 4:26:24 PM PST by Kevmo
Title shortened
BlackLight Power, Inc. Announces the Game Changing Achievement of the Generation of Millions of Watts of Power from the Conversion of Water Fuel to a New Form of Hydrogen
Twitter Google+ LinkedIn Email More
BusinessWire · Jan. 14, 2014 | Last Updated: Jan. 14, 2014 5:01 AM ET
BlackLight Power, Inc. (BLP) today announced that it has produced millions of watts of power with its breakthrough Solid Fuel-Catalyst-Induced-Hydrino-Transition (SF-CIHT) patent pending technology in its laboratories.
Using a proprietary water-based solid fuel confined by two electrodes of a SF-CIHT cell, and applying a current of 12,000 amps through the fuel, water ignites into an extraordinary flash of power. The fuel can be continuously fed into the electrodes to continuously output power. BlackLight has produced millions of watts of power in a volume that is one ten thousandths of a liter corresponding to a power density of over an astonishing 10 billion watts per liter. As a comparison, a liter of BlackLight power source can output as much power as a central power generation plant exceeding the entire power of the four former reactors of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant, the site of one of the worst nuclear disasters in history.
Our safe, non-polluting power-producing system catalytically converts the hydrogen of the H2O-based solid fuel into a non-polluting product, lower-energy state hydrogen called “Hydrino”, by allowing the electrons to fall to smaller radii around the nucleus. The energy release of H2O fuel, freely available in the humidity in the air, is one hundred times that of an equivalent amount of high-octane gasoline. The power is in the form of plasma, a supersonic expanding gaseous ionized physical state of the fuel comprising essentially positive ions and free electrons that can be converted directly to electricity using highly efficient magnetohydrodynamic converters. Simply replacing the consumed H2O regenerates the fuel. Using readily-available components, BlackLight has developed a system engineering design of an electric generator that is closed except for the addition of H2O fuel and generates ten million watts of electricity, enough to power ten thousand homes. Remarkably, the device is less than a cubic foot in volume. To protect its innovations and inventions, multiple worldwide patent applications have been filed on BlackLight’s proprietary technology.
This breakthrough transformational power technology can be witnessed in a live demonstration hosted by BlackLight of on January 28th at 11 AM. Details and updates will be posted at the company website (http://www.blacklightpower.com/). Those interested in attending can contact BlackLight to preregister for this limited availability event.
Applications and markets for the SF-CIHT cell extend across the global power spectrum, including thermal, stationary electrical power, motive, and defense. Given the independence from existing infrastructure, grid in the case of electricity and fuels in the case of motive power, the SF-CIHT power source is a further game changer for all forms of transportation: automobile, freight trucks, rail, marine, aviation, and aerospace in that the power density is one million times that of the engine of a Formula One racer, and ten million times that of a jet engine. The SF-CIHT cell uses cheap, abundant, nontoxic, commodity chemicals, with no apparent long-term supply issues that might preclude commercial, high volume manufacturing. The projected cost of the SF-CIHT cell is between $10 and $100/kW compared to over one hundred times that for conventional power sources of electricity.
BlackLight’s previously reported pioneering solid fuels and CIHT electrochemical cell use the same catalyst as the newly invented SF-CIHT cells, and they served as a model for Dr. Mills to invent the breakthrough plasma producing SF-CIHT cell. These background technologies have been validated by industry. BlackLight’s results of multiples of the maximum theoretical energy release for representative solid fuels was replicated at Perkin Elmer’s Field Application Laboratory at their facility using their commercial instrument. Moreover, our advanced CIHT electrochemical cell was independently replicated offsite as well.
“We at The ENSER Corporation have performed about thirty tests at our premises using BLP’s CIHT electrochemical cells of the type that were tested and reported by BLP in the Spring of 2012, and achieved the three specified goals,” said Dr. Ethirajulu Dayalan, Engineering Fellow, of The ENSER Corporation. “We independently validated BlackLight’s results offsite by an unrelated highly qualified third party. We confirmed that hydrino was the product of any excess electricity observed by three analytical tests on the cell products, and determined that BlackLight Power had achieved fifty times higher power density with stabilization of the electrodes from corrosion.” Dr. Terry Copeland, who managed product development for several electrochemical and energy companies including DuPont Company and Duracell added, “Dr. James Pugh (then Director of Technology at ENSER) and Dr. Ethirajulu Dayalan participated with me in the independent tests of CIHT cells at The ENSER Corporation’s Pinellas Park facility in Florida starting on November 28, 2012. We fabricated and tested CIHT cells capable of continuously producing net electrical output that confirmed the fifty-fold stable power density increase and hydrino as the product.”
The disclosure of one of BlackLight’s patent application that was recently-filed worldwide, its 10 MW electric SF-CIHT cell system engineering design and simulation, high-speed video of millions of watts of supersonically expanding SF-CIHT cell plasma, The ENSER Corporation and Dr. Terry Copeland validation reports on the prior generation CIHT electrochemical cells, and the Perkin Elmer report on solid fuels are publicly available on BlackLight’s webpage (http://www.blacklightpower.com/). Technical papers by BlackLight providing the experimental tests of plasma to electric conversion, results of excess energy production from solid fuels, results of continuous electricity production at fifty times higher power density than prior generation CIHT electrochemical cells, and the detailed chemistry and identification of Hydrinos by ten analytical methods that laboratories can follow and replicate are given at http://www.blacklightpower.com/.
About BlackLight Power
BlackLight Power, Inc. is the inventor of a new primary energy source applicable to essentially all power applications such as thermal, electrical, automotive, trucking, rail, marine, aviation, aerospace, and defense. The BlackLight Process, the power source, is the process of releasing the latent energy of the hydrogen atom by forming Hydrinos. The SF-CIHT cell was invented by Dr. Mills to release this energy directly as electricity from water as the only source of fuel.
For more information, please visit http://www.blacklightpower.com/
Glossary:
BlackLight Process: A novel chemical process invented by Dr. Mills causing the latent energy stored in the hydrogen atom to be released as a new primary energy source.
Hydrino: Hydrinos are a new form of hydrogen theoretically predicted by Dr. Mills and produced and characterized by BLP. Hydrinos are produced during the BlackLight Process as energy is released from the hydrogen atom as the electron transitions to a lower-energy state resulting in a smaller radius hydrogen atom. The identity of the dark matter of the universe as Hydrinos is supported by BlackLight’s spectroscopic and analytical results as well as astrophysical observations.
SF-CIHT Cell: Each SF-CIHT cell comprises two electrodes that confine a highly electrically conducive H2O-based solid fuel that serves as a source of reactants to form Hydrinos. A low-voltage, very high current (about one thousand times that of household currents) ignites the water to form hydrinos and cause a burst of plasma power of millions of watts that can be directly converted to electricity using proven plasma to electric power conversion technology such as a magnetohydrodynamic converter.
Magnetohydrodynamic Converter: An electrical generator that uses no moving parts. It comprises a magnet as in a conventional generator, but the conductor that moves in this case is the flowing plasma that produces a voltage at a pair of electrodes that are perpendicular to both the direction of plasma flow and the magnetic field of the magnet.
Photos/Multimedia Gallery Available: http://www.businesswire.com/multimedia/home/20140114005647/en/
Contacts
BlackLight Power, Inc. Media: Beata Stepien, 609-490-1090 Ex 125 Assistant for Dr. Randell L. Mills bstepien@blacklightpower.com
we’ll run out of water***Not bloody likely. There’s enough energy in one gallon of sea water as 50 gallons of gasoline.
Even if there is such energy, what are the byproducts of this reaction, and who exactly (biologists? chemists? physicists? poets?) so quickly declared them harmless, and what should we do with them? Just pile them up, until the end of days? If they possess less energy than the ground state, there isn't much we can do with them... they become dead weight forever, ashes of Hydrogen.
Also, I see that you are using salty water for the reaction. Even if we assume that salt is not a concern for the reaction itself, what happens to all these dissolved salts after the water is converted to plasma and then into something else, not seen before on this Earth? Those ought to be piles and piles of salt... and you know, that salt is not very good for the land. If you dump it back into oceans, it will be eventually changing the water; also, trucking of all that salt water across the country, and trucking the salt back, can't be free. What's the story?
But I suspect if the reaction is real, and not imaginary, then salt in the water is bad news - for one simple reason: it had to be heated up. First, we lose energy on that; and secondly, that energy can break bonds between Na and Cl. What will happen then? You get Na and Cl2. None of them are good for life, by anyone's definition (unless you are an extraterrestrial from an unusually nasty planet.)
There is plenty in this theory that can be questioned even without debating whether the reaction itself is possible.
sure its there in between amps and kevmos!
You seem to have gone the exact opposite in terms of your understanding. Are resistors measured in Watts? Or is it Joules? Well??? Where is the “Joule” setting on your multimeter? I thought for a brief instant you actually might know something, but ... sigh... it turns out you’re just as ignorant as many of these other skeptopaths.
asked & answered
-——————www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg85823.html—————————
Q: How many bandwagons must a skeptopath jump onto before he feels superior to others who have more knowledge than him?
A: You tell me.
Maybe if you answered the questions of how resistors are measured, where the “Joule” setting is on a volt meter, and the power density hypothetical posted, we might think you could make a point. But instead, you seem to persist in your ignorance, as if that were some kind of virtue.
Welll lets see, in this world a current of 1 Amp which drops 1V in potential has dissapated 1 ohm.
In kevmo land where a watt is a joule, I suppose that an amp is a coulomb.
so the answer to you question, resistance is one coulomb per volt.
Wow. You haven’t answered any of the scientific stuff, contributed nothing to the scientific furtherance of debate, zero, nada, nothing. Perhaps that would mean the new unit of zero should be named a vmpolesov, at least for debate purposes. But don’t divide by it, because a guy like you might actually start debating from such a position.
I tell ya what. Don’t worry about power density. When you put in your batteries & solar, the wires to & from them can be as thin as a hair, according to your understanding.
This not a LENR thread and it isn’t even your thread
***I posted it. Is it someone else’s thread? Does the keyword have “LENR” on it? What gave you the idea you could post ridicule on a thread that you had said you would not do such a thing on? Perhaps I should start pushing garbage onto your prepper threads, like your favored “silver as an antibacteria” or whatever? Well, are you a man of your word?
you are wrong on both counts. Lets see if you are a man and own up to your mistake.
***Well now. Let’s see about YOU first. If you post a prepper thread, is it ‘yours’ and is it a ‘prepper’ thread? Or do you have some skeptopathic definition that we’re all supposed to be aware of that’s hidden in an obscure prepper book from 1952?
No the wires will be big n fat ‘specially at 12 V DC
Since you lack hs-level of understanding of physics, but spout off with a loud mouth, for the time being at amuses me to post to this thread.
I’m signing off now , because I have to get up and work tomorrow at my job that requires actual understanding of advanced degree-level principles.
Kevmo lacks a high school-level understanding of basic physics and electricity. His type god weeded out in the first semester of physics of calculus.
***I have an EE degree from University of California. You are the one who seems to have a simple lack of understanding of basic physics, by backing up the poster who said that he could rub his socks across the carpet and generate millions of WATTS of power to something.
It makes for amusing reading though!
***I agree, by going back to the original post and seeing who replied, we find the insult artist vmpolesov who doesn’t know the difference between Watts and Amps. But he enjoys sending out zingers that prove he has no understanding of what’s been discussed.
I also can rub my socks and generate millions of watts. The other poster was making a point (which you missed).
Get your money back fro u cal because if they taught you that watts are joules you got ripped off
Mr. Kevmo, you never did demonstrate that you know the difference between a watt and a joule.
***Well, to be candid, I demonstrated that I knew the difference between an Amp and a Watt, which, since you’re backing up the poster who didn’t know the difference... it would appear that you have not demonstrated that you know the difference. I am qualified to debunk your nonsense.
Be so kind as to answer some questions:
***Since you’re the one who demonstrated ignorance about the difference between an amp and a Watt, you will need to go first, Mr. 2 degrees.
1) Care to explain the 14,000 times that the PF Anomalous Heat Event has been REPLICATED?
2) Same hypothetical as above: What is 1Watt + 1Watt?
3) Same hypothetical as above: You have a resistor to measure. Electricity in, heat out. 100Watts in, 99 Watts of heat out. You verify the measurement for 6 continuous days.
Then someone hands you a black box resistor. You measure 100Watts electrical in, 150Watts heat out. You measure the volume, and if it were to have been filled with ANY Chemical (Like gasoline), it would burn out within 2 minutes, but you’re seeing the heat out for 20,000 minutes. You look for extra wires, external sources and find none. You invite 6 other colleagues to find them, to no avail.
What is the Energy Density of the first resistor compared to the second one?
I suspect trickery or flawed instrumentation on your 100 in - 150 out scenario.
Didn’t you already explain the difference between Watts & Joules above?
And yet, you seem to not know the difference between Amps & Watts, seein’ as how you’re backing someone who doesn’t know.
Here’s a good place to start with your Joule calculations when they bear upon LENR results. It proves I’m not silent about Joules, and it will also prove you to be silent because basically, EVERY other skeptopath who has been posted to this item has generated crickets. Let’s see how you do, Mr. 2 degrees Expert.
———————www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg85822.html-———————
Tell ya what. If you answer the power density question, we can get down to whatever units you want to discuss.
I doubt you will answer.
Cold fusion reactor independently verified, has 10,000 times the energy density of gasoline
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3023592/posts
Fri 24 May 2013 06:35:28 PM PDT · by Kevmo · 568 replies
Intrade Gateway via Extreme Tech ^ | May 21, 2013 at 12:43 pm | Sebastian Anthony
I agree. I look forward to your energy density calculations.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3023592/posts
Cold fusion reactor independently verified, has 10,000 times the energy density of gasoline
Fri 24 May 2013 06:35:28 PM PDT · by Kevmo · 568 replies
Intrade Gateway via Extreme Tech ^ | May 21, 2013 at 12:43 pm | Sebastian Anthony
What is 1 Watt + 1 Watt? Or are you too afraid to answer hypotheticals?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.