Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

A man posed the issue of Ted Cruz's presidential ineligibilty to Mark Levin at a booksigning event at Bookends in Ridgewood, New Jersey on Sunday, August 18th. Mark uses the occasion of his live radio broadcast the next day to discuss the matter. A local Ridgewood Blog picked up on the story. Do his comments ring true to fellow Freepers?
1 posted on 08/27/2013 10:44:47 AM PDT by one guy in new jersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: one guy in new jersey

Cruz has a Canadian birth certificate. The original intent of the “natural born” requirement for presidents was so that they would not have divided allegiances.

Cruz was born a dual citizen of the US and Canada. According to the original intent of the framers, he is disqualified.


2 posted on 08/27/2013 10:52:04 AM PDT by Triple (Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: one guy in new jersey

Welcome to FR! Food for the nativist trolls around here?


3 posted on 08/27/2013 10:53:12 AM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark; C. Edmund Wright
Ted Cruz for POTUS ping. Mark Levin offers his services as his Constitutional attorney.

On his daily broadcast, Levin explained that he was “so sick of these birthers” after one man, in a hot line at a New Jersey book signing, “gets in my face, points to an obscure note … and says you were wrong about this.” On Cruz? “In my mind there’s no doubt about it. He’s eligible should he choose to run.”

4 posted on 08/27/2013 10:57:12 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: one guy in new jersey

May the good Lord help and protect me for my rash disregard of all prudence and circumspection...and possibly of any vestige of sanity too, in daring to enter, even for just a quick moment, this contentious issue here again. I just bowed out of another FR discussion about it because I definitely didn’t, and don’t, have the time to pursue it.

But alas...one quick comment....Psalm 23... Psalm 23....


The good Mark Levin was right when he qualified his conversation by pointing out this is an issue he has not studied.....

as Mr. Levin said,
“And I thought to myself, you know I, this is not a subject that I have studied so thoroughly, but he’s born of a mother who is an American citizen. Doesn’t that make him a natural-born Ci… “No, but he was in Canada when he was born!” Okay, but she wasn’t Canadian, she was an American citizen! She was an American citizen. And so, the issue isn’t what the Constitution says in that regard, the issue is how do we interpret that. And the way I interpret it is, his mother’s an American citizen, so he’s an American citizen!”

We agree. Mr. Levin has patently not studied this issue.
We agree, Senator Cruz is an American citizen.
But that is not the issue, Mr. Levin.
The issue is whether he can possibly qualify as a Natural Born Citizen. As they say, that’s a Horse of A Different Color.

OK, I’m so far out of this thread now that even Beep Beep the RoadRunner can’t catch my dust.

Bye........


5 posted on 08/27/2013 11:04:49 AM PDT by faithhopecharity (E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: one guy in new jersey

Nobody here as far as I know has said Ted cruz is not an American citizen..

although he was born in another country, his mother was an American citizen, and at least 19 years old...

Ted Cruz was born an American citizen...

the question is “Is he eligible to be president of the United States since he is not a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN”...

besides being born in another country his father was not an American citzen at the time of his birth...

If Obama who was born in the US but also without an American citizen father could be said to be ineligible even if he had been born in the Lincoln bedroom, how does Ted Cruz who was born in another country get a pass ???

This has not been acceptably explained in these threads...

Either there is no case for Obama to be ineligible..

or Ted Cruz is also ineligible...

We cant have it both ways...

Even McCain with his overseas birth to TWO American citizen parents and his father stationed overseas in the US military had to prove his eligibility through the Senate to be POTUS...

and Ted Cruz did nopt have both parents as American citizens with a father in the US military sent there by our government..

When I was in the US military and arrived at a US base overseas I was told to go back to the US for any births of children so they would be eligible to be POTUS...

this was 1975...5 years after Ted Cruz was born...

I knew that my son born the year before in the US was not eigible to be POTUS...

I was not an American citizen at the time and was not naturalized as an American citizen until he was 8 months old..

you can argue until you are blue in the face but that was the law when my son was born in 1974...

So if Obama is not eligible, neither is Ted Cruz...

these laws are not a smoresborg...

they are the same for everyone...


9 posted on 08/27/2013 11:19:17 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: one guy in new jersey

Signs up today, posts one article and then doesn’t answer any of the posts. Looks like zotbait to me.


10 posted on 08/27/2013 11:21:40 AM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Uncle Miltie: Obama poisoned race relations for a generation. Everything is racial now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: one guy in new jersey; Jim Robinson; xzins; onyx; Lakeshark; Windflier; Servant of the Cross; ...

I will continue to propose that ANYONE who uses this forum to propagate the stupid idea that Ted Cruz is not a Natural Born Citizen according to the constitution be banned from this forum.

There is no truer Natural Born American than Ted Cruz in the Government today. Anyone using this forum as a means of tearing down this man or insulting the rest of the forum with stupid vapid arguments about whether or not Ted Cruz is “eligible” should be treated as a DU or MSM plant and be shown the door.

There is always a point at which one must draw a line in the sand. This is that point.


33 posted on 08/27/2013 11:45:51 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: one guy in new jersey
Now, some of this is probably coming from the left. So now they’re the birthers. But some of it’s coming from others, too. People just get obsessed, or conspiratorial, and there’s no end to it, on a matter like this, and there’s nothing I can say or point to that’s going to change their mind.

Yes, now the anti-Cruz leftists can take the birther baton from the anti-Obama birthers and continue with the race. The transition should be smooth because a lot of historical research has already been completed and neatly organized for this new crop of birthers.

In the end, the voters and their electors will once again decide the issue and Cruz will "lose" only those voters he could never have gotten anyway.

34 posted on 08/27/2013 11:46:25 AM PDT by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: one guy in new jersey

Two issues here: where you are born and to whom; and the issue of loyalty vs citizenship.

Let’s address the latter first, because that really hangs people up. Citizenship can be conferred automatically. We must never interpret the constitution to mean that no one with a dual citizenship is eligible. Tomorrow Jamaica could make a candidate a citizen and poof, his candidacy is over. Dual citizenship is thus meaningless as a disqualifier.

Hopefully it would be difficult in these technological times to hide that a candidate spent 5-10 years outside our country, voting, involved in his host country’s government. Even as an American citizen, one hopes that his loyalty would be questioned and he would not be chosen as a serious candidate. That would be an example of divided loyalty. Yes, president Obama is borderline on that account, and much of his past has been obscured.

Back to the first point: where you are born and to whom. In 1961, and possibly today (?), the law of the land was that an American woman giving birth outside the country had to have lived 5 years after the age of 15 in the USA to be able to confer her citizenship onto her baby. This is what birthers are all about.

We have never seen an actual, non-forged proof that Barack Obama was born in the USA.

When she was a 17 year old girl “in trouble,” in 1961 with a baby of a different race, she could easily have gone where her Seattle school chums in such positions went. They popped over the border into Canada to the unwed mother homes run by either the Salvation Army or the Catholic Church. Usually they gave the babies up for adoption. She was not old enough to confer citizenship.

She may have changed her mind about giving up her mixed race baby, because within a month of his birth, she was alone with a little baby she didn’t know how to care for, enrolled in the university in Seattle. (She was never seen pregnant in Hawaii. She never ever lived with Barack Obama Senior.).

These are the two different questions raised by foreign birth or loyalty.

Ted Cruz was born outside the country to a woman eligible to confer citizenship. As was John McCain. No one knows where Barack Obama was born, and that is all birthers want to know.


37 posted on 08/27/2013 11:53:03 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: one guy in new jersey

Freerepublis Thread about “Concern Trolls”;
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2594943/posts


39 posted on 08/27/2013 12:02:02 PM PDT by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

So what does Levin think about obama’s eligibility?


46 posted on 08/27/2013 12:10:35 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican (When you vote for evil because you can't see evil, you ARE evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: one guy in new jersey

So what’s your opinion of the issue? We haven’t heard back from you.


48 posted on 08/27/2013 12:13:59 PM PDT by CatherineofAragon (Support Christian white males----the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: one guy in new jersey

Levin flunks Constitution 101 by misinterpreting Natural Born....our Founding Fathers put that in there so we would not have foreigners ruling the US....like the foreigners ruling Great Britain at the time...King George III was German

Levin was also Obama Supporter on the Eligibility issue....and GOP refusing to make Obama Eligibility a main issue actively aided Obama in 2008 and 2012

As for Cruz....I have no problem supporting him. Unlike Obama...Cruz never hid his foreign birth...never

But....mark my words: The biggest Obama Supporters on the Obama Eligibility issue will be the same ones attacking Cruz on his eligibility....and that includes Levin. I do not trust anyone who is Obama Supporter on the Eligibility issue


139 posted on 08/27/2013 2:45:02 PM PDT by SeminoleCounty (Difference between George Zimmerman and Al Sharpton is that Sharpton woulda let honky family burn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: one guy in new jersey

Ted Cruz for Governor of Texas sounds better.


202 posted on 08/27/2013 4:28:57 PM PDT by TauntedTiger (Keep away from the fence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: one guy in new jersey

Levin suddenly wants to talk eligibility issues? Where were you in 2008 for Zero and McCain and Calero? Well concerning Zero, he along with the rest of the media talking heads were threatened from the Chicago liberal facists to protect their puppet. People have called his station on the natural born citizenship issue and were faded out not given air time. Coward. Constitutional bar doesn’t agree with you either on a foreign born person being natural born citizen Levin.


240 posted on 08/27/2013 5:47:51 PM PDT by TheBigJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: one guy in new jersey

Read that Cruz is getting rid of his Canadian citizenship. That will help him.


352 posted on 08/28/2013 4:12:12 AM PDT by Biggirl (“Go, do not be afraid, and serve”-Pope Francis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: one guy in new jersey
So the guy gets in my face, and he starts pointing and pointing, and I looked at him and I pointed back, and I cursed, unfortunately, but the, because, uh you know, he was…he was a nutjob.

That's about the summary of dealing with birthers. I couldn't have said it better myself.

353 posted on 08/28/2013 4:41:39 AM PDT by Jeff Winston (Yeah, I think I could go with Cruz in 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Impy; GOPsterinMA

here is the ongoing birther-biz
who dropped out of ME-2?
Sox vs. Sox tonite in Boston.


540 posted on 08/30/2013 6:47:00 PM PDT by campaignPete R-CT (we're the Beatniks now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: one guy in new jersey

The Constitution states that you must be a “natural born citizen”. There are two paths to citizenship, one is natural, ie by birth, and the other is to be naturalized. If Cruz is a citizen and he has not been naturalized then he is a natural born citizen. There is no in between. Natural or naturalized citizens are the only two choices.


558 posted on 09/02/2013 10:51:58 AM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson