Posted on 07/10/2013 5:06:53 AM PDT by Morgana
The mother of the famous singer Cher considered having an abortion and went as far as making an appointment for one, but eventually changed her mind.
Yet, in a new tweet yesterday, Cher essentially said she didnt care if abortion would have killed her or someone who tweeted her opposing abortion.
For Cher, the right to choose to take the life of a baby in an abortion is paramount. A tweet sent to Cher and her response appear below, though she has since deleted the tweet.
What about the man Cher? Does he not get the right to choose as well?
Need? OK... Let’s examine that. The consequences of NOT having abortion access are?
Reduced promiscuity? Is that the main problem, Cher?
Or in the case of banning abortions after 20 weeks the parents can’t abort the baby because the baby has special needs. Most special needs, like down syndrome can’t be found till 20 weeks of pregnancy. 90% of babies with down syndrome are aborted.
The easy answer to that is another question -
is it morally wrong to kill a Down’s syndrome child?
And we care what this ancient halfbreed has to say, because....??
Perhaps Cher should have aborted the train wreck they now call Chaz?
The left does not think so. In fact the left gets angry when you don’t abort a down syndrome child. Look at how angry they were at Sarah Palin for allowing Trig to live.
Yeah, when I tried to pin down a libinlaw about why she despised SP so much, she clenched her fists, shook her body, and muttered “that baby”...
They didn’t want to be TOO vocal about it, though, because it exposes the murderous, wicked nature of their worldview.
Too bad it didn't...
An argument *in favor* of abortion.
I guess she believes women don’t have the right to chose not to have sex.
If Chaz had been blessed with a normal human being as a mother, she would probably be a well adjusted young woman with children of her own.
When freaks raise kids, there is a good chance that the kids will turn out freaky. I have a bit of sympathy of that young female person, regardless of how she has mutilated herself.
The so-called “right to choose” has never been about the right to choose to have an abortion; it’s always been about the right to choose whether it’s a baby or a blob. No one ever aborts a baby, they abort a blob. Once a woman is pregnant, she gets to “choose” what it is. If she wants it, it’s a baby. If not, it’s a blob. This is why the word BABY is anathema to the pro-abortion crowd.
I'm not trying to rag on you, and I understand that most comments like this are made in jest, but---NO. Abortion is wrong.
Can we do a late term abortion on her now?
If I had borne a mess like Chastity I would probably be in favor of abortion also.
“I have a bit of sympathy of that young female person, regardless of how she has mutilated herself.”
I agree. The disastrous path that woman chose for herself is heartbreaking.
What about the “human” life inside the mother? Doesn’t the unborn infant have rights? Cold blooded women.
Well there you have it. Abortion is, to these people, more important than life itself.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.