1 posted on
04/24/2013 8:12:01 PM PDT by
rocky50
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: rocky50
2 posted on
04/24/2013 8:14:59 PM PDT by
mylife
(Opinions $1, Half Baked 50c)
To: rocky50
Hugo Gernsback would be very pleased.
3 posted on
04/24/2013 8:15:32 PM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(The ballot box is a sham. Nothing will change until after the war.)
To: rocky50
Way cool!!
Can I have one? Pretty please??
4 posted on
04/24/2013 8:18:46 PM PDT by
MV=PY
(The Magic Question: Who's paying for it)
To: rocky50
To: rocky50
Weird song that is more acclaimed than it deserves, very cool rocket.
Total non-sequitur here.
7 posted on
04/24/2013 8:22:11 PM PDT by
DesertRhino
(I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
To: rocky50
So rocket ship goes up about 1100 feet and then rocket ship comes back down. I guess I don’t get it. What is the big deal about that?
To: rocky50
Color me impressed! That was incredible.
9 posted on
04/24/2013 8:23:04 PM PDT by
Jim from C-Town
(The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
To: rocky50
Cool but it probably burned all it’s onboard fuel performing that little demo. Chemical rockets are a losing proposition. They will never power us into deep space or beyond.
10 posted on
04/24/2013 8:23:24 PM PDT by
MtBaldy
(If Obama is the answer, it must have been a really stupid question)
To: rocky50
Looks like using twice as much fuel as would make sense.
11 posted on
04/24/2013 8:24:45 PM PDT by
loungitude
(The truth hurts.)
To: rocky50
Reminds me of how rocket ships were portrayed in 1950s sci-fi flicks.
To: rocky50
Impressive but it has to carry fuel to land into orbit, the first stage or all of them?
I forgot what the proportion was but for every pound of weight in the Saturn V, X pounds of fuel were required.
It seems parachutes would make more sense.
14 posted on
04/24/2013 8:31:52 PM PDT by
Lx
(Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
To: rocky50
Is this an animation?
The shadows of the rocket and the water tower are not parallel.
15 posted on
04/24/2013 8:31:56 PM PDT by
exit82
("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
To: rocky50
To: rocky50
17 posted on
04/24/2013 8:37:38 PM PDT by
Wiggins
To: rocky50
I’ll be heading to Waco in a few weeks. Anyone have connections with SpaceX that I can talk to about getting a tour? Used to work for a NASA contractor (avionics software), grew up across the street from JSC and my father was Mission Control from Apollo to Shuttle... so it’s a big interest to me personally.
To: rocky50
Impressive but too much fuel required to do that from orbit.
To: rocky50
A California based company!
Incredible!
30 posted on
04/24/2013 9:19:00 PM PDT by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
To: rocky50
Great music accompaning the video...
39 posted on
04/24/2013 9:48:00 PM PDT by
GGpaX4DumpedTea
(I am a Tea Party descendant...steeped in the Constitutional Republic given to us by the Founders.)
To: rocky50
45 posted on
04/24/2013 10:46:41 PM PDT by
DocRock
(All they that TAKE the sword shall perish with the sword. Matthew 26:52 Gun grabbers beware.)
To: rocky50
Strange combustion jet...central high velocity core surrounded by tongues of lazy, fuel=rich flame at different locations. Wonder what accounts for that?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson