Don't confuse me with the facts . . .
This is from March, but I didn’t find it in a search of recent or older articles. It’s one that folks interested in the climate change/global warming hoax will want to see.
Then we are not dead again.
Data? We don’t need no stinkin’ data!
Unfortunately the people pushing global warming (AKA "climate change") have only their opinions and don't want to hear about data.
The EPA is a political tool of the Left and has nothing to do with science - unless, of course, it's created.
Great post.
Thanks for posting. Ping for later...
yea, well... he showed up the day AFTER they voted for their wacko provisions...
The green weenies had already won.
Bump for later
Mark for later.
Thinking with his brain rather than his tuckus.
Bump
Don't confuse me with the facts . . .
Srbfl
“There’s not enough CO2 in the atmosphere to do much of anything,” he said. “Then you add to that the fact that CO2 only accounts for about 3.6 percent of the ‘greenhouse effect,’ and you discover that carbon dioxide by itself is incapable of having any real effect on climate change.”
Good stuff!
It is indeed excellent. Excellent charts & graphs. Only thing he should have added would have been samples listings of the current cooked data from NASA et. al, compared to the previous cooked data . . . . and finally compared to the original data.He mentioned the Climategate emails/FORTRAN programs only tangentially. I recognize that he had a limited amount of time scheduled for his presentation - but in fact (if only in hindsight, but IMHO it was predictable) questions about why the data he presented differed from the cooked data the committee Democrats wanted to rely on took a lot of his time and he should have prepared a presentation on that issue.
The reality is, of course, that journalism is inherently biased in favor of the virtue and importance of journalism. Which, as you could infer from Theodore Roosevelt’s “Man in the Arena” speech, directly correlates into criticism of those who try to actually get things done. Throw in Adam Smith’s warning about monopolyPeople of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices.and the fact that the AP newswire has been a continuous virtual meeting of all major journalism outlets for over a century and a half, and you have an explanation of why journalism is left-wing propaganda. It’s not that journalism is in the pocket of the Democratic Party, it’s that the Democratic Party is in the pocket of AP journalism.
Global Warming on Free Republic
If anyone wants to be on or off the Agenda 21 ping list, please notify me by Freepmail. It is a relatively low volume list in which we have been exploring the UN Agenda21 and related topics. We have collected our studies with threads, links, and discussions on the Agenda 21 thread which can be found here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2738418/posts
NEW ACTION THREAD:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2863065/posts
Post 128 of the Action Thread is a summary of the history of Agenda 21, “what they are doing”, “what to do about it” and a good bibliography for further reading.