Tying the dog to the track. No, it doesn’t make it better for me. You mean to tell me the guy couldn’t have thought of some other convenient method of doing away with the dog? Like dropping it off to PETA? They’d kill it for him.
My comments were directed only to your assertion you would not have stopped for a dog, but only for a person.
Never asked you if tying the dog made it better for you. Asked if the possibility the engineer started to stop the train because the guy who tied the dog to the track might have still been close enough to jump or fall in front of the train, made it better for you. Thus, the motive would have been stopping the train for the person, instead of directly for the dog.
Please go back and re-read my post if this doesn’t make sense— and work on not twisting other people’s words.
Agreed, PETA would have killed the dog for him.