My comments were directed only to your assertion you would not have stopped for a dog, but only for a person.
Never asked you if tying the dog made it better for you. Asked if the possibility the engineer started to stop the train because the guy who tied the dog to the track might have still been close enough to jump or fall in front of the train, made it better for you. Thus, the motive would have been stopping the train for the person, instead of directly for the dog.
Please go back and re-read my post if this doesn’t make sense— and work on not twisting other people’s words.
Agreed, PETA would have killed the dog for him.
Sorry, my original reply was to glyptol, who made the comment about not stopping for a dog, only a person. So, I can see if you didn’t follow the thread back.,,
I only included you on it, having to do with other trains that might be on the line behind it comment.
My apologies.
Please do not "REPLY" to my comments unless you are actually going to make a "reply" instead of a "Lookie here dummie"