Posted on 08/30/2012 11:47:00 AM PDT by moonshot925
30 September 2001 = 5,807,463,412,200
30 September 2009 = 11,909,829,003,512
Total Increase = 6,102,365,591,312
Increase in by Fiscal Year
FY 2002 = 420,772,553,397 FY 2003 = 554,995,097,146 FY 2004 = 595,821,633,587 FY 2055 = 553,656,965,393 FY 2006 = 574,264,237,492 FY 2007 = 500,679,473,047 FY 2008 = 1,017,071,524,650 FY 2009 = 1,885,104,106,599
They have presented two budgets.
To be critical is to admit misunderstanding.
No what we are doing is pointing out to Third Party bots who have NO intelelctual or moral honesty the vast and obvious difference between the two parties
If you cannot rally enough people to take over an existing party all any third party you organize is going to be a pathetic sham that splits the conservative vote and hands the Progressives unchallenged political dominance
Bush and the Last GOP Congress Federal Deficit 2006 $160 billion
Obama and last Democrat Congress Federal Deficit 2012 $1.6 Trillion.
Even brain dead third party bots who refuse to learn a single fact that does not validate their pre determined emotional opinions should be able to do the math on THAT equation.
And Obama and the last Democrat Congress spent a record $1.6 TRILLION defecit in 2010. But of course the Obamabots like WTC911 with their Moveon.org written propaganda will not EVER discuss that fact.
I agree, but tell that to those who won’t cast a vote for Romney.
I expect an answer with that kind of response. Again, do you know what base line budgeting is. Also, what that means concerning fiscal year 2009.
Also, another question you refused to answer: Was TARP suppose to be paid back with interest? Where is that translated in Obama’s “budgets” post 2009? Hmmm, Bush was not a limited government type, but he sure as hell was not a big spender like the current idiot that runs the Excutive Branch.
“I expect an answer with that kind of response.”
He’s dead Jim.
Dammit Jim I’m a freeper. I can’t bring them back after they’ve been zotted!
devolve writes:We see Barack Obama as a man who is still seeking approval from a father he barely knew, a pain that was evident by seeing the reenactment of Barack at the grave of his father. We get a glimpse into how he was raised and shipped from continent to continent and a glimpse of the men who filled the void of an absentee father. Men like Frank Davis, Bill Ayers, Edward Said, Jeremiah Wright and Roberto Unger. All controversial men in their own right. Each of them shaping and molding Obamas Marxist ideologies.
If reelected to another four years it is likely that Obama will only continue to dismantle America that he views as too rich and too powerful in the world today. It is evident by his refusing the Keystone pipe line which would have created jobs that are so desperately needed. His desire to weaken our military and reduce the number of arms we have have to protect ourselves. Obama Sr. had the mindset that we should be taxed at 100% and that it was the government who would give us what they deemed necessary for us to live and get by.
For America to survive it is imperative that we reign in those bent on her destruction and elect those who vow to govern by the principles set forth by our Founding Fathers and not of those of Obamas. As Dinesh so poignantly stated near the end of the documentary that it is up to YOU
Anybody who gets a 1040 booklet from the IRS should look at the back cover. The pie chart will show you where the “revenues vs. outlays” go. This, of course, likely doesn’t include the massive borrowing the Treasury is doing with its now-direct T-Bill sales to China and other creditors.
You refuse to acknowledge the facts in many posts in this thread. Nevertheless, you admit some facts to MNJohnnie:
“I agree, but tell that to those who wont cast a vote for Romney.”
It’s a quick “I agree,” followed by the liberal “but....” Now we’re supposed to go into a diversion of “telling people who won’t cast a vote for Romney...
It’s none of your business who does or doesn’t vote for Romney. This thread isn’t about this, however.
Yes, we know about Republican over-spending was and FReepers criticized it way before you joined. Don’t presume that FReepers are naive; therefore, they should be lectured by a n00b who is defending a zotted n00b troll.
This ain’t DU, I’m sure you know that.
Got it?
“Repealing Obamacare will do nothing (as the hits havent even hit yet with that monstrosity.)”
Repealing Obamacare will actually hurt as it actually reduces the debt!
Bwa hahahahahahahahahahaha. Man that’s a good one. I don’t care who you are that’s a funny one there. ROFLMAO.
What kind of idiots do they take us for. I guess they are counting on the 51%
Debt Added by the Previous 43 U.S. Presidents
Combined
1789 through 2008
$ 6.3
Trillion Dollars
Debt Added by Resident Barack Obama
One Term (thus far)
$ 6.5
Trillion Dollars
Thanks for the troll-ignored numbers, Lucy.
I told the troll that, according to his own-posted numbers, the RAT Congress was responsible for 3 trillion of deficit spending from ‘07 to 09. I didn’t even mention the three years of deficits without a single budget.
Boilerplate answers come to the usual “Bush’s fault” no matter what you point out to them. It’s a sure sign of desperate RATs defending 0h0m0 and his communist regime that considers the economy performance INDEFENSIBLE!
The surrogate trolls are ordered to muddy the water and to put out published numbers with bogus whodunit.
Truth is truth; it’s no defense of Republicans from this registered Indie, albeit, conservative at heart.
Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my Viking Kitty/ZOT ping list!. . . don't be shy.
Soros employee got COOKED : )
BTTT!
The truth, i.e., a failure to vote for Romney is a vote for Obama, hurts, doesn’t it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.