Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Turkish origin for Indo-European languages
Nature.com ^ | 8-23-2012 | Alyssa Joyce

Posted on 08/24/2012 8:04:40 AM PDT by Renfield

Languages as diverse as English, Russian and Hindi can trace their roots back more than 8,000 years to Anatolia — now in modern-day Turkey. That's the conclusion of a study1 that assessed 103 ancient and contemporary languages using a technique normally used to study the evolution and spread of disease. The researchers hope that their findings can settle a long-running debate about the origins of the Indo-European language group...

(Excerpt) Read more at nature.com ...


TOPICS: History; Science
KEYWORDS: anatolia; epigraphyandlanguage; godsgravesglyphs; harappan; harappans; indoeuropean; indusvalleyscript; language; marysettegast; platoprehistorian; turkey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
Using methods from evolutionary biology, the duo compared common words in 87 Indo-European languages, such as 'mother', 'hunt' and 'sky', to figure out how language ‘species’ were related to one another4. They traced the origins of Indo-European languages to 7,800–9,800 years ago, supporting the Anatolian hypothesis...
1 posted on 08/24/2012 8:04:45 AM PDT by Renfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Ping.

Proposed spread of language, animated:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=0pa7SPns8fQ


2 posted on 08/24/2012 8:06:40 AM PDT by Renfield (Turning apples into venison since 1999!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

The title is absurd: Turkish is an Altaic language.

Why folks outside the Turkish Republic accept the conceit of Ataturk and his political heirs that everything inside the bounds of the modern Republic of Turkey is “Turkish”, when most of the history and much of the culture even after the region was overrun by the Turks was Greek, Armenian, Kurdish, Roman, Persian,. . . always mystifies me. The sort of willful historical ignorance, endemic among Americans, that can’t see further into the past than WW II, I suppose.


3 posted on 08/24/2012 8:13:00 AM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfield
That Sanskrit is related to Latin, Greek, and other European languages was first realized in the late 1700s so a lot of this is not new and has been worked on by many scholars for a long time. The notion that the original homeland of the ancestral language from which Indo-European languages descended might be Turkey is also not new--but is less popular than other suggestions for where the original homeland was. I think the area north of the Black Sea is the most widely-accepted theory nowadays. The time frame for when the ancestral language (Proto-Indo-European) was spoken is usually put more recently than 5800-7800 B.C.

The ancient Anatolian branch of Indo-European, including Hittite, Luwian, and Palaic in the second millennium B.C., and some later languages such as Lydian, are rather different from the other languages and that branch seems to have diverged from the rest a little earlier. That does not seem to fit in with Anatolia being the original center from which all the later languages spread out.

4 posted on 08/24/2012 8:15:50 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

Pachalafaka sounds so romantic in Turkey.


5 posted on 08/24/2012 8:16:17 AM PDT by P.O.E. (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

While I don’t want to sound too literal, headline writers can be so ignorant.

“Turkish” refers to a country, a language group and a wide-spread ethnic group. All three have Indo-European roots, but the Article refers to Anatolia, not Turkey.


6 posted on 08/24/2012 8:18:29 AM PDT by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

The title of the article is misleading. A “Turkish origin” doesn’t imply geographical Anatolia but rather an origin among ethno-cultural Turkish groups from central Asia who eventually migrated to Anatolia, which then became “Turkey” (after themselves).


7 posted on 08/24/2012 8:18:36 AM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (Ki-hagoy vehamamlakhah 'asher lo'-ya`avdukh yove'du; vehagoyim charov yecheravu!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David

True, Turkish ia an Altaic language but it spread into modern day Turkey from Asia. The languages spoken prior to that were not Altaic. The Turkish language has nothing to do with this article.


8 posted on 08/24/2012 8:20:26 AM PDT by Right Wing Puppy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

Didn’t Noah’s boat land in Turkey after the Flood?


9 posted on 08/24/2012 8:23:22 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Puppy

Did you read the second paragraph of my post?


10 posted on 08/24/2012 8:26:56 AM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David

Ataturks objective, and that of his nationalist predecessors, was to cleanse Turkey of all alternative cultures and create a homogenous, unified Turkish nation-state.


11 posted on 08/24/2012 8:31:30 AM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Renfield
LOL. There were no Turks in Turkey 8000 years ago.

And oh and by the way, These modern day "Turks" are really just badly baptized Greeks anyhow. ...to paraphrase Doroshevich

12 posted on 08/24/2012 8:36:31 AM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

See Genesis 10


13 posted on 08/24/2012 8:39:45 AM PDT by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

No it landed on the Mountains of Ararat. It could be in Turkey, Iraq or Iran(Persia).


14 posted on 08/24/2012 8:40:55 AM PDT by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

So now in addition to Astronomy, Mathematics, the Space Program, Brain Surgery, Nanotechnology and Spicy Take-Out Chicken, Muslims are getting credit for inventing the English Language too?


15 posted on 08/24/2012 8:41:04 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buwaya

Yes, yes, I know that. But how is that relevant to the acceptance of his conceit that, for instance, the Ecumenical Patriarchate or some Persian ruins in far eastern Anatolia or the Greek, Armenian, or Kurdish citizens of the Republic of Turkey are “Turkish” by the rest of the world?


16 posted on 08/24/2012 8:42:20 AM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
So now in addition to Astronomy, Mathematics, the Space Program, Brain Surgery, Nanotechnology and Spicy Take-Out Chicken, Muslims are getting credit for inventing the English Language too?

But apart from Astronomy, Mathematics, the Space Program, Brain Surgery, Nanotechnology and Spicy Take-Out Chicken...what have the Muslims ever done for us?

17 posted on 08/24/2012 8:42:55 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

Then why are they looking at the Anatolian origins of the Indo-Europeon language instead of around the area or Iraq and Iran?

BTW, how many Ararats are there in the world?


18 posted on 08/24/2012 8:59:27 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

How is this possible when aryans/indo-iranians/indo-aryans and sanskrit came from india?


19 posted on 08/24/2012 9:02:51 AM PDT by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Genesis 8:4
King James Version (KJV)

4 And the ark rested in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, upon the mountains of Ararat.

It says the “mountains of Ararat” NOT nessarily on THE Mt Ararat.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountains_of_Ararat


20 posted on 08/24/2012 9:03:50 AM PDT by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson