Posted on 05/07/2012 3:17:32 PM PDT by tpanther
SCIENCE NOW KNOWS THAT MANY OF THE PILLARS OF DARWINIAN THEORY ARE EITHER FALSE OR MISLEADING. YET BIOLOGY TEXTS CONTINUE TO PRESENT THEM AS FACTUAL EVIDENCE OF EVOLUTION. WHAT DOES THIS IMPLY ABOUT THEIR SCIENTIFIC STANDARDS?
(Excerpt) Read more at discovery.org ...
I’m not banging peoples heads with a world view. I linked to an article about ERVs and how they provide irrefutable proof that humans and chimpanzees have a common evolutionary ancestor. It further demonstrates that all mammals, if one goes back far enough, have a common ancestor. I invited you to read, comprehend and, if you can, refute the article. I believe that is where you are having your difficulty.
You certainly haven’t exposed any holes in modern evolutionary science and I don’t think an honest review of my responses here could be fairly termed “squealing” by anyone.
Stick with your magic apple/talking snake story. I’ll bet you’ll find it easier to comprehend.
Ah.... “Reification”.
Just like “evolution did this”.
“Has any Creationist been caught faking evidence?”, he asked rhetorically.
Ahhhh, but there’s where your so-called logic fails.
No what really happened was I posted and article illustrating the holes in evolution to the point when one removes the PROVEN falsehoods, it’s “thin” to say the least, YOU in turn squealed about caps lock, which wasn’t the case btw...
and posted some article that illustrated nothing to answer MY article and then got sore because I disagreed with you.
Liberals.
Unlike the kids who were on your little school bus, I know how to stay on topic. Since I began responding to your post, I have asked you to read, comprehend and refute the article on ERVs. This may be an insurmountable obstacle for you but it is all I have asked of you and all I have chosen to discuss since the ERV evidence irrefutably demonstrates the existence of common evolutionary ancestry among species. It also, by the way, amounts to an inextricable connection between evolution and modern genetic science; one cannot have one without the other. To deny evolution requires one to deny genetic science.
Do that, and I will be happy to discuss it further with you.
Ooops, wrong again. Staying on topic would actually be addressing the erroneous and uncorrected embryos etc.
Even post #43 was closer and it was rhetorical! :)
I’m staying on my topic which I clearly indicated in my first response to you was all I was willing to discuss. I indicated that if you would address the ERV evidence I would discuss it further with you. I also said I didn’t care if you wanted to accept the challenge or not.
Careful reading is an important life skill. Look into it.
Not your topic!
So, do you routinely respond to the shortcomings and outright fraud of evolution by posting irrelevant articles?
Don’t fret, no one else has either.
If you could read it and actually understand it you would see that it is far from irrelevant. It, in fact, shows that evolution is a demonstrable fact.
Stick with the magic apple/talking snake story. It’s far less work for you to understand and, since you don’t care about the truth, for you, it’ll work just as well.
You seriously don’t understand. I posted an article about telling the truth, you ignored it and blew it off and didn’t address it and posted more evo-rubbish as if that actually fixes things.
And now, on the way out, you’re immensely uncomfortable with your maker and project-alot...about telling the truth no less.
I addressed your post with a link to an article that disproved your contention. That’s good evidence that I understand your point very well. By addressing your point I obviously did not blow it off. That’s two errors you’ve made in one response.
You refer to the link I provided as rubbish and suggest that I am somehow uncomfortable. Those assertions are also wrong but, as matters of opinion, you are clearly entitled to them.
Your last line is unclear. I don’t think many of us have any idea how close we are to being on our way out; I personally feel pretty well and could easily outlive you. As to which of us is closer to the truth, I’m very comfortable with the clear evidence contained in the link I sent you which you clearly haven’t read or understood.
Obviously, your comfort concerns me so perhaps you would be happier with the folks discussed at this link.
http://galileowaswrong.com/galileowaswrong/Flyer_for_Conference_3.pdf
Oh my!
I’m so sorry! I meant on the way out of the post, thread, exchange...
I hope you’re healthy as a horse!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.