Wrong!
To insinuate that Breitbart may have been assassinated at all is pure crap!
FR doesn’t need this kind of negative attention and anyone who condones this junk should be banned, period.
The questions should be asked on Breitbart.com, not here.
Randy, why in the Reuters article did Breitbart’s father-in-law say that he knew of no heart problems, and why did the coroner’s office say Breitbart had not seen a doctor in over a year - if all the claims coming out of the woodwork (since his death) about heart attacks, hospitalizations, moving his office because he was short-winded, etc - all within the last year - are accurate?
Those claims can’t all be true, and it is not “pure crap” to wonder why the discrepancies. In fact, given the death threats Breitbart had been receiving (about which Bill O’Reilly had previously publicly said he was worried) , the fact that Soros had made threats to the media if they reported on the eligibility issue and the very evening he died Breitbart had conducted an interview of Sheriff Joe Arpaio regarding Obama’s birth certificate and draft registration being forged, Bill Ayers’ mother introducing Obama as a foreign student, etc... it would actually be “pure crap” to assume that there COULD NOT HAVE BEEN foul play - especially before an autopsy was completed or any of his medical history was verified by anybody.
It seems apparent that you’ve not bothered to read the thread. If that’s the level of diligence you’re gonna have, it’s a waste of my time to converse with you. Thanks for playing.