[DJ MacWoW]

Exploring possibilities is always what FR has done. You've been here forever. You remember the Clinton years. Proposing suppositions is an FR tradition. And you know that if the Boss didn't want it, it would be gone in a flash.

[Travis McGee]

Just read the Officer.com (police) link at 204 called Pick Your Poison.

There are untraceable ways to make people “drop dead.”

A regime which conceived and authorized Murdergate, aka Fast And Furious, would not blink at passing, via many cutouts, a little bit of “drop dead” medicine from the CIA’s pharmacopoeia to a willing assassin.

Heck, Ayers and the Weather Underground happily discussed the logistics of killing and disposing of up to 25 MILLION recalcitrant dead-ender conservatives.

And ironically, the video Andrew was supposedly going to release showed an adult Obama yucking it up with Ayers in a revolutionary context.

And the same day or nearly, Rush gets a bomb scare, which is an unveiled assassination warning.

But like somebody said up thread, some Freepers still believe the jury is out on the Reichstag Fire. (Maybe it really WAS the communists?)

[Randy Larsen]

And you have been here long enough to know that FR has been given the reputation of a bunch of conspiracy kooks by the MSM even though it is not.

This is why we don’t have a higher standing among conservatives because we keep allowing this junk.

It costs us monthlies mega bucks to keep FR going, and for what? This kind of junk?

I’m not going to just let this roll off my back because I’m helping to keep the lights on!

[LibertyLA]

Ah the Clintons!

Here is a good Sunday Night Documentary to watch to see the Clinton’s in action... really worth watching to see what bad politicians are all about.

Very creepy!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwV82J68Ixs

[philman_36]

Proposing suppositions is an FR tradition.
If I may be so bold...that is the worry! Someone is going to come out with an abstract thought that someone else will pick up on and then they will start looking into it because it's credible and soon they bust it wide open.
IMO that's why so many are trying to discredit even the idea that such a thing is even possible. Merely "thinking outside of the box" is worrisome.

JMO and YMMV.

[butterdezillion]

I’ve only been here as a member a couple years but was lurking for a long time before registering. What drew me to Free Republic was the amazing research that was being done here. If it’s a bum theory it will get blasted here, which means that if it’s an unconventional theory it will either survive the scrutiny and be reinforced, or else it will be shown wrong. That’s an invaluable tool, because if I come up with a stupid idea I can be shown the evidence that refutes it and then I don’t waste my time chasing dead ends.

That’s why I don’t mind engaging with people who disagree with me, unless they go limp on me and resort to ad hominems or keep making the same already-disproven points over and over again. Steel sharpens steel and I look forward to finding somebody made of steel, as long as it’s true and not just a bunch of BS.

The discrepancies in the claims about Breitbart’s heart problem the last year need to be explained. I can understand the family and friends for the past year wanting to keep the public from knowing about a heart problem, but I can’t understand his father-in-law not knowing, or his father-in-law still trying to keep it a secret after Breitbart is already dead. And it makes no sense for the coroner’s office to say Breitbart hadn’t seen a doctor in over a year if he had been hospitalized for 2 weeks with a heart attack within the last year.

If something doesn’t make sense to me I ask others to see if there’s something I’m missing. That seems like a reasonable response to discrepancies.