Randy, why in the Reuters article did Breitbart’s father-in-law say that he knew of no heart problems, and why did the coroner’s office say Breitbart had not seen a doctor in over a year - if all the claims coming out of the woodwork (since his death) about heart attacks, hospitalizations, moving his office because he was short-winded, etc - all within the last year - are accurate?
Those claims can’t all be true, and it is not “pure crap” to wonder why the discrepancies. In fact, given the death threats Breitbart had been receiving (about which Bill O’Reilly had previously publicly said he was worried) , the fact that Soros had made threats to the media if they reported on the eligibility issue and the very evening he died Breitbart had conducted an interview of Sheriff Joe Arpaio regarding Obama’s birth certificate and draft registration being forged, Bill Ayers’ mother introducing Obama as a foreign student, etc... it would actually be “pure crap” to assume that there COULD NOT HAVE BEEN foul play - especially before an autopsy was completed or any of his medical history was verified by anybody.
It seems apparent that you’ve not bothered to read the thread. If that’s the level of diligence you’re gonna have, it’s a waste of my time to converse with you. Thanks for playing.
The thread written by Null and void has no facts.
Listen to the very people close to Breitbart and what they say!
They begged that this conspiracy crap not get started! They explained his heart issue.
Why would I want to listen to a bunch of lies?