Hawaii Attorney General Seeks To Sanction And Label Orly Taitz Vexatious Litigant In Hawaii

http://www.scribd.com/doc/78113346/Taitz-v-Fuddy-Memorandum-in-Opposition-to-Plaintiff-s-Motion-Reciprocal-Subpoena-Enforcement-1-12-2012 ^

[Obama Exposer]

Hawaii Attorney General files opposition to Taitz's motion for reciprocal subpoena enforcement and also seeks sanctions against Taitz including labeling Taitz a vexatious litigant in Hawaii which means Taitz would be prohibited from filing future lawsuits in Hawaii related to Obama's (non-existent)records without first obtaining leave of Court. The opposition motion also argues why the GA subpoena is not valid in the State of Hawaii, as we already raised and pointed out here. The GA subpoena per OSAH rules is only valid in GA. The Hawaii Attorney General also claims the subpoena was not properly served upon the parties involved.

[sten]

I agree it is rather “a small issue”. I have been in the courts for over 30 years. I am not a lawyer. I don’t think think inmate’s letters fail to Capitalize the word “judge”. You might as well fold your hand if you disrespect the position. Personally i think the Judge in this case is a political hack but I would spell the name and title properly in my filings.

in other words... forget the law, just kiss the ring

why do i think you're in chicago.

as for your comments regarding Dr Orly's grammar... your comments are rife with errors.

[sten]

If will be up to the Judge to determine the definition of Natural Born Citizen. If the Judge decides its born in the US, then Obama is eligible and the case is closed. If the Judge decides its born in the US with two US citizen parents, then its up to Judge to determine if both of Obama’s parents are US Citizens at the time of is birth. The COLB indicates Obama’s father’s birthplace but does not say if Obama’s father was a citizen at the time of his birth. Furthermore, the COLB does not indicate whether or not Obama’s father was a Permanent Resident Alien of the US at the time of Obama’s birth.

if one could be a natural born citizen with only one American citizen parent... then there is no difference between a natural born citizen and a normal citizen. if this were the intent of the founders, they wouldn't have included the language.

the intent was to insure the person occupying the office had no familial split allegiances. the term 'natural born' implies the person is a US citizen because there is no alternative... it's natural to be an American citizen because both parents are citizens. it's that simple.

[sten]

Assuming that was actually the intent of the hearing, BHO could have his lawyer submit either the COLB that was scanned and displayed back in 2008 or the LFBC that was scanned and displayed last April.

as someone that has over 30 years in the field that has created scanning systems, drivers, and compression algorithms, i can assure you a scanned document does not come in 'parts'. of course it does depend on the scanner, but the vast majority will create a simple image from the scan. the image would either be lossy or lossless. the format could be single image or allow for multiple pages, as with TIFF images. but these pages would be from successive scans and not from a single scanned page.

in any event, there is no way a scanner would scan an image then 'lift' SOME written text away from the background. it would either 'lift' it all or none of it. i could understand removing the background, kinda, as it could save space. of course, if i were scanning legal documents, i'd look to capture every smudge and wrinkle on the paper in the original scan.

as is, the document provided by the administration is a composite. a forgery. it was built by a graphics editor. this is obvious by the lack of anti-alias on some of the overlaid text.

my guess would be, since forging such a document would be tightly guarded, they only had a small group to choose from to perform the task... and a senior graphics artist / document forger was not among them

[El Sordo]

Well, good luck with that.