Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Germany's feared Scharnhorst ship was sunk in WWII
BBC ^ | December 25, 2011 | Claire Bowes

Posted on 12/25/2011 5:27:04 PM PST by decimon

On 26 December 1943 one of the great sea battles of World War II took place.

Germany's most famous battleship - the Scharnhorst - was sunk by Allied forces during the Battle of the North Cape.

Norman Scarth was an 18-year-old on board the British naval destroyer HMS Matchless, which was protecting a convoy taking vital supplies to the Russian ports of the Arctic Circle.

In a BBC World Service interview he described how he witnessed the sinking of the Scharnhorst:

>

We could still hear voices calling from the black of that Arctic winter night, calling for help, and we were leaving those men to certain death within minutes.

It seemed a terrible thing to do and it was. But it was the right thing to do.

If we had stayed a moment too long we could have joined those unfortunate men.

I can hear those voices and I grieve for those men every day of my life.

>

(Excerpt) Read more at bbc.co.uk ...


TOPICS: History; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: godsgravesglyphs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: ClearCase_guy

SCHARNHORST had a much longer career than BISMARCK. She is the only surface ship I know of to sink a full size carrier in combat [H.M.S GLORIOUS, Norway, 8 JUN 40] . She and her sister ship GNIESENAU were in action in 1939 [sank HMAS RAWALPINDI], 1940 [Norway], 1941 [two month cruise in the Atlantic,Guenther Lutjens, Admiral commanding, that sank either 16 or 22 ships], 1942 [Channel Dash in company with GNIESENAU and PRINZ EUGEN], and sunk in 1943.

She was ,in fact, so active that aside from combat repair, neither she or her sister ship ever had time for the upgrade that would have replaced her Achilles heel [her main battery] of 9 X 11” guns in three turrets with 6 X 15” guns. If she had been carrying 15” guns, her duel with DUKE OF YORK would have been a bit more interesting. But she lived up to her ship’s motto, “IMMER VORANS”-”Always forward”.


21 posted on 12/25/2011 7:45:55 PM PST by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Reily

Originally classified as a battlecruiser, then reclassified as a battleship.


22 posted on 12/25/2011 7:47:06 PM PST by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Silentgypsy

My uncle served escort duty on the Murmansk run with the Royal Canadian Navy. He contracted tubuculosis and died a few years later; my father caught it from him, spent two years in hospital and lost half a lung. He died of complications in August this year.


23 posted on 12/25/2011 7:47:27 PM PST by Squawk 8888 (Tories in- now the REAL work begins!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JAKraig

Hat tip to you sir.

My thanks.


24 posted on 12/25/2011 7:51:42 PM PST by Michael Barnes (Obamaa+ Downgrade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PzLdr

I remember the term “pocket battleship” in reference to Germanys fast battleships.


25 posted on 12/25/2011 8:00:10 PM PST by PhiloBedo (You gotta roll with the punches and get with what's real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Victor
yep!
Heavy cruisers had much less armor then battleships and were smaller. They were supposed to be able to out run anything they couldn't outfight. There general displacement & length that set the categories.
USN heavy cruisers were armed with guns no larger then 8 inch.
Battlecruisers were a ship midway between a battleship and a cruiser, other navies bought into the concept much more then did the USN. For example the Royal Navy had them, of course in some sense “The Battle of Jutland” invalidated the concept.
26 posted on 12/25/2011 8:02:05 PM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: decimon
The Scharnhorst was thought to be a cursed ship, even by the national socialists:

The Curse of the Scharnhorst

27 posted on 12/25/2011 8:04:31 PM PST by Caipirabob ( Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bravo whiskey
Did they ever get launched?
I know the legendary aircraft carriers Lexington, Saratoga & Enterprise were originally intended to be battlecruisers.
28 posted on 12/25/2011 8:04:57 PM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Reily
Thanks, Reilly...as usual my Freeper friends are a wealth of information and historical knowledge.

8 inch guns are a huge difference from 16 inch guns. Battleships were named after states....were Cruisers named for cities? Presidents?

29 posted on 12/25/2011 8:10:56 PM PST by Victor (If an expert says it can't be done, get another expert." -David Ben-Gurion, the first Prime Minister)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob

If a ship can be cursed then I guess it was.


30 posted on 12/25/2011 8:25:51 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: PhiloBedo
I remember the term “pocket battleship” in reference to Germanys fast battleships.

Yep, that term was used in reference to some Royal Navy ships, too - even HMS Hood.

31 posted on 12/25/2011 8:47:38 PM PST by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel
I remember the term “pocket battleship” in reference to Germanys fast battleships.

Yep, that term was used in reference to some Royal Navy ships, too - even HMS Hood.

The Hipper class cruisers displaced about 12,000 tons. The battle cruiser HMS Hood displaced 46,000 tons. The Hipper class cruisers were called pocket battleships because they had 11" guns. They were built to be close enough to the 10,000 tons limit, that the Treaty of Versailles put on German warships, that other nations wouldn't start a war.

32 posted on 12/25/2011 9:11:11 PM PST by Pilsner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Reily
The Lexington class aircraft carriers, USS Lexington (CV-2) and USS Saratoga (CV-3) were originally intended to be battlecruisers, but were rebuilt as aircraft carriers. However, the Yorktown class carriers, USS Yorktown (CV-5), USS Enterprise (CV-6), and USS Hornet (CV-8) were designed and built as aircraft carriers.
33 posted on 12/25/2011 9:15:24 PM PST by reg45 (I'm not angry that Lincoln freed the slaves. I'm angry that Franklin Roosevelt bought them back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob; decimon
That is utter and complete CRAP invented by Frank Edwards 50 years ago.

And the rest of the article is even less reliable

Frank Edwards was a mountebank with a talent for misleading the gullible.

To get the real opinion of the German navy, try googling "Scharnhorst" and "lucky"

34 posted on 12/25/2011 9:47:02 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (New gets old. Steampunk is always cool)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy; decimon

Wow, thanks for the info. I had been reading about the Scharnhorst curse since high school with no material to counter it.


35 posted on 12/26/2011 5:19:45 AM PST by Caipirabob ( Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

Actually, I first remember reading about it in a series of books by an author of ghost stories. His name is Richard Weiner (Dick Weiner?) I tried to find the series later but I’ve had no luck. I have read about the “curse story” in other books and articles, but if it’s all fantasy, I can’t say I’m sad to see it associated with national socialists.


36 posted on 12/26/2011 5:23:34 AM PST by Caipirabob ( Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

>> Bismark was a one shot which never made it back to port. Tirpitz was a fjord queen.

Who was it that made the crack to Herr Hitler that the Germans ought to focus on submarines, “the perfect choice for a second rate navy”?


37 posted on 12/26/2011 5:24:37 AM PST by QBFimi (When gunpowder speaks, beasts listen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: PhiloBedo

The German classification for the three “pocket battleships” [DEUTSCHLAND, renamed LUETZOW, ADMIRAL SCHEER, and ADMIRAL GRAF SPEE] was “Panzerschiffe” or “armored ship”.

They went about 12,000 tons or so, and were designed for commerce raiding [long range diesels]. All were done before SCHARNHORST was launched. The only thing they had in common with SCHARNHORST was the armament. Both classes used 11” guns, an advantage for the pocket battleships, a disadvantage for the battlecruisers.


38 posted on 12/26/2011 6:58:03 AM PST by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

Danzig was bombarded by the SCHLESWIG-Holstein, one of the dinosaurs Weimar was allowed to keep after Versailles. She was, at the time, used as a training ship.


39 posted on 12/26/2011 7:03:14 AM PST by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Pilsner

The HIPPER class carried a main battery of 8” guns. The only German warships with an 11” main battery were the three pocket battleships, DEUTSCHLAND [later LUETZOW, ADMIRAL SCHEER, ADMIRAL GRAF SPEE], and SCHARNHORST and GNIESENAU [both of which had been designed for an upgrade to 15” guns.


40 posted on 12/26/2011 7:05:58 AM PST by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson