Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vintage Newt Shredding of MSNBC Reporter while Defending Sarah Palin * Video
msnbc ^ | 9/3/2008 | sibauste

Posted on 12/15/2011 3:50:58 PM PST by show

Go Newt. He Filets the MSNBC Reporter on Sarah's behalf.

Newt needs to WIN and then select Sarah Palin as his VP !!!

(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; History; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: newt; palin; politics; smackdown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: show

This is a good example of Newt’s basic conservative philosophy. That philosophy governs his thinking and yet does not preclude him from recognizing and accepting help and support from others with whom he does not fully agree, e.g. per the interview, Joe Lieberman, Zell Miller, and even John McCain.

I simply do not trust the motivations and agenda of those establishment GOP’ers who are now viciously bashing Newt. I think they have invested so much of their time, money and hopes in the Mittster that they cannot let go. How sad! Who chooses candidates here? The insiders or the voters?

And if someone says, “Yes, but Newt is flawed.” Well, duh, who isn’t? At least he is smart, experienced, knowledgeable, articulate, mostly conservative, and WILLING TO FIGHT! I don’t see that in any of the remaining candidates ... and neither does Obama, who is just licking his chops to have the GOP pick Mitt.


21 posted on 12/15/2011 4:27:22 PM PST by Belteshazzar (We are not justified by our works but by faith - De Jacob et vita beata 2 +Ambrose of Milan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

>> You may have a point on the style of that performance. But on substance, I can at least count on Santorum and Bachmann to get rid of ALL of Obamacare, and not keep the 300 pages that they happen to like. With Santorum or Bachmann, I won’t get stuck with GingrichCare. >>

Your obsession with that is boring. Any of the candidates will sign any bill given them that will get rid of Obama Care. No one is saying to keep 300 pages of it per se. Obviously you can only exist within the shallow texture of sound bytes and rambling big thinkers leave you vexed.


22 posted on 12/15/2011 4:29:11 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Moderator of Florida Tea Party Convention Presidential Debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
No one is saying to keep 300 pages of it per se.

No one except Newt Gingrich, of course.

"Now there are about 300 pages that are pretty good, a little over 10 percent, but they should be part of the replace document" - Newt Gingrich

23 posted on 12/15/2011 4:33:28 PM PST by Hoodat (Because they do not change, Therefore they do not fear God. -Psalm 55:19-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

Which he says right after he says you have to REPEAL THE ENTIRE 2700 PAGES. Let........me.........type..........slower..........for.........you........he......says....this.....AFTER.....saying.....that......all.......2700.......pages......MUST......be......repealed.

The other is a theoretical statement. As President, he won’t have the power to include anything anyway. Congress will send up the replacemnt, which hopefully is nothing. You have never demonstrated any ability to look at anything in context. You take parts of soundbytes out of context and out of reality. Why don’t you go to his new contract and see if there’s anything in there that you don’t like?


24 posted on 12/15/2011 4:41:34 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Moderator of Florida Tea Party Convention Presidential Debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: thesearethetimes...

I can see VP Palin, marching down the hall to the West Wing, and putting Pres. Newt in an armbar to get him to push reforms and tax cuts through Congress at a faster rate.


25 posted on 12/15/2011 4:43:20 PM PST by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

lol, you are really spinning it now. He clearly says that the 2700 pages will have to be repealed so that he can assure that the right 300 pages get included with the ‘replace’ document. Newt Gingrich’s intent could not be more clear. He wants to replace ObamaCare with a better, smarter big-government solution - one that will include the 300 pages that Newt considers “pretty good”.


26 posted on 12/15/2011 4:49:17 PM PST by Hoodat (Because they do not change, Therefore they do not fear God. -Psalm 55:19-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: show

Perry/Palin. ...Just a matter of time.


27 posted on 12/15/2011 4:52:40 PM PST by TexasCajun (Fast & Furious , Solyndra & Light Squared would be enough to impeach any White President !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: show

Perry/Palin. ...Just a matter of time.


28 posted on 12/15/2011 4:53:32 PM PST by TexasCajun (Fast & Furious , Solyndra & Light Squared would be enough to impeach any White President !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: show

Perry/Palin. ...Just a matter of time.


29 posted on 12/15/2011 4:53:42 PM PST by TexasCajun (Fast & Furious , Solyndra & Light Squared would be enough to impeach any White President !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

Your right, you outted him. Newt really wants to turn us into the USSR redux. Damn, you’re ONTO him. Way to go!

It is amazing how you saw right through all of that 1980s conservative education of the Republicans in congress and the way you brilliantly figured out that his whole 1994 Contract election was a ruse to simply set the stage for when he could run for President and really turn us into a Socialist nation.

And damn, he would do it all while pretending to repeal socialized medicine - which would make it even sneakier.

Man you are a genius. All of Newt’s career was simply a 35 year ruse to get us to this moment - and dammit if the brilliant Hoodat hadn’t seen through it all and is warning us.

Whew. Close one. Thank you mr dumass


30 posted on 12/15/2011 4:54:42 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Moderator of Florida Tea Party Convention Presidential Debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: show

Sorry, got sidetracked by the trolls.
Back to our original thread, which was Newt defending Palin in a way that the others can only dream about having the ability to do:

Here it is again to get us back on track:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ie8LDlgJ0c


31 posted on 12/15/2011 4:56:24 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Moderator of Florida Tea Party Convention Presidential Debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

NEWT is willing and able to smack the rats coming and going.

Newt is a leader and energizes the base. The Conservative Base.


32 posted on 12/15/2011 5:02:09 PM PST by show
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: show

>> NEWT is willing and able to smack the rats coming and going. Newt is a leader and energizes the base. The Conservative Base >>

Yes, but it’s all a sinister plot to fool us all and to secretly take over the nomination so he can sneak parts of Obama Care right past the House, the Senate, the tea party and the rest of us. And thankfully, Hoodat exposed this evil secret diabolical plot for all of us to see. Arent you relieved?


33 posted on 12/15/2011 5:06:04 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Moderator of Florida Tea Party Convention Presidential Debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
Is this the tactic you typically use when the facts don't go your way? I have provided citations. Your exaggerated response has been rather childish. I never said anything about the USSR. I never criticized the 1994 Contract With America. And I never said that Gingrich wanted to turn us into a Socialist nation. If you insist on clinging to such strawmen as these in order to hold fast to your mistaken belief that Newt Gingrich is somehow a conservative, then it really shows the futility of your cause.

Three months from now when Gingrich is trailing badly in the delegate count, you might then know why. And hopefully, you will remember what an idiot you were to write that last post. Until then, you can continue to reminisce about the glory days of the Clinton Adminstration. And I will be looking for an actual conservative who is deserving of my vote.

34 posted on 12/15/2011 5:06:50 PM PST by Hoodat (Because they do not change, Therefore they do not fear God. -Psalm 55:19-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
Newt on Sarah Palin:

"....a National figure who's young enough, that she well could be a leader of this country of the next two generations.

And that she is a terrific rallying symbol for young people across America. And for women across America to recognize that you can work hard, you can achieve and you can rise.

And if you've got guts, you can actually become a National figure."

35 posted on 12/15/2011 5:09:38 PM PST by show
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

>> Is this the tactic you typically use when the facts don’t go your way? >>

No, that’s how I swat aside little whiny folks who spend their days trolling for little tidbits of comments out of context - and are too stupid to figure it out. I was being absurd to demonstrate absurdity - YOURS. If you can’t recognize a train of thought commentary in context made after a definitive statement about the bill - and you surely cannot - then you are not worth my time.

For all I know, there might be 300 pages of decent stuff in there. I’m not worried about it because all 2700 pages will be repealed if the election goes right. Extemporaneous big thinkers always give fits to tiny thinkers like you. And there are a lot of you, so you may be right about his delegate count. Wouldn’t surprise me. Is why I have always known that Newt’s ramblings might sink him. I would have never said anything good about the bill, but he didn’t ask me.

but the notion from you that he wants to sneak 300 pages of bad crap in is just ludicrous.


36 posted on 12/15/2011 5:13:09 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Moderator of Florida Tea Party Convention Presidential Debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

What we know is that Newt is conservative. He will be the nominee.


37 posted on 12/15/2011 5:15:43 PM PST by show
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: show

Sounds just like Michelle Bachmann.

No wait, we’ve never heard Bachmann be that eloquent about anything, let alone another Republican figure (with the possible exception of Congressman Steve King - she has said nice things about him. But that wasn’t elegant so much as kind of crush like creepy actually. But it was nice.)


38 posted on 12/15/2011 5:15:52 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Moderator of Florida Tea Party Convention Presidential Debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

Can we get “Palin / Rubio” instead?


39 posted on 12/15/2011 5:17:05 PM PST by Hoodat (Because they do not change, Therefore they do not fear God. -Psalm 55:19-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

So do you think Newt was lying when he said what he did about replacing Obamacare with a bill that included 300 pages of the original Obamacare bill?


40 posted on 12/15/2011 5:19:34 PM PST by Hoodat (Because they do not change, Therefore they do not fear God. -Psalm 55:19-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson