I’m cursed with a logical scientific mind. Animals like Sasquatch are scientifically impossible. Not that they couldn’t exist, but that if they existed, there would be a wealth of bones and other evidence left behind from their existence.
It stands to reason that if there is a Sasquatch, it had a mother who bore it and a father to sire it. That would mean an extended family. Hundreds. Thousands. Yet we find nothing of skeletal remains of these huge man beasts.
The lack of evidenciary forensic matter left behind from dead Sasquatch being completely absent, it stands to reason they cannot exist or have existed. Anybody of intelligence who gives this 30 honest seconds of thought will quickly come to that conclusion.
The ones who just have to believe this crap will have every ready made excuse in the book. “The skull and bones are eaten by other animals”. Yada.
Whatever.
Sasquatch do not exist and never have existed. There is a complete absence of any evidence.
Today, with the advent of camera phones which everyone owns, I won’t accept anything less than photographic documentary evidence for bigfoot men, Nessie monsters, ghosts, ET UFOs, yada.
Even then, I refuse to believe what I see when photoshop is so prevalent, when even youtube videos can be doctored to this level of realism:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfqDVP_0O0c
Awh, Bull Shiite.
Evidence?!
Evidence?!
Evidence?!
You want what?!!!
/S
How can you say that when we’ve got proof of his existence in footage like this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9G9OXtuJ4Q
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n5_zk-QWCw8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5-jjPMMuU8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEsjvZFWg-o
By that same argument dear and raccoons are also mythical creatures- otherwise you would see their bones laying all over the place
Ever been hunting or hiking or camping? You don’t find many bones in the woods unless it is a recent kill. In all the years I’ve been out in the woods, and it’s been many, I’ve only seen remains of maybe 4-5 animals.
Take a walk in the real wilderness sometime, you may find that your scientific logic isn’t what you think it is.
I’m not trying to berate you but you are making an assumption based on incorrect information.
On that note, I’ve seen things in the wilderness that to this day I cannot explain. Don’t be so quick to discount the possibility that something large might exist in the woods.
With all that being said however, I would like to see some real physical evidence beyond foot prints and pictures.
Depending on what one believes or theorizes sasquatch could be, there is evidence that homo erectus and homo neandertalis both buried their dead.
There is also the curious case of Ishi who died less than a hundred years ago...
The “where is the bones?” argument is not strong enough to disprove their existence.
Washington has an unknown number of grizzly bears – probably less than 40, yet people have only caught glimpses of them, and only one photo exist (a cell phone photo). And WA grizzly bones have never been found. With the “where are the bones doubters” the WA grizzly existence is an impossibility.
And here in Washington State we have a black bear population of over 45,000, yet I challenge anyone to go out and find me naturally killed bear bones or even cougar. You can spend every day of the year on your search and the chances of you finding them are next to nil. How much smaller would those chances be if the population was less than 300? Heck I have been on many deer hunting trips into the Cascades, where I would have a hard time proving deer exist.
Anyway, that is my take on this “bones” argument. I’m not a 100% believer in Bigfoot, but I still give the possibility a chance. There are too many credible witnesses to totally discount it.
I do however think the first and most important rule for those who have an encounter with them or evidence they leave behind is to eliminate ALL other possibilities before claiming its Bigfoot. For every one credible sounding report you can find a dozen that could have other explanations.
It is also scientifically impossible for bees to fly..............