Posted on 08/09/2011 6:10:13 PM PDT by rxsid
Edited on 08/09/2011 6:11:45 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
When the White House posted online an image of President Obama's purported long-form birth certificate, it also linked to the previously circulated "Certification of Live Birth," the short-form version that had been presented as the only birth documentation available.
However, the short-form certificate to which the White House linked April 27 was a forgery, claims computer expert Ron Polland, Ph.D., who says he made the image himself.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
That’s a a Composition fallacy.
A resolution saying person x has y history and so meets z criteria doesn’t mean that y history is necessary to meet z criteria. It only means that person x has that history and meets the criteria. Otherwise you’d also have to stipulate that natural born citizens are only those born on military bases, or even limited to those born on military bases in the canal zone, all of which is also in the resolution.
THIS is absolute garbage from polarik and the title couldn’t possibly be any more misleading. He did NOT create the image. He *claims* he REcreated it and he is full of whatever it is idiots and liars are full of these days.
wnd should be ashamed of itself for this.
polarik singlehandedly destroyed any credibility those who questioned obama’s colb ever had or ever will, and here he is trying to do it again. GAHHHH!!!!!
WND just officially jumped the shark and a whole school of orcas. What was Corsi’s PhD, again? Sharkskin handbag design?
Wow it looks like Polarik successfully baited and trapped the usurper in his own lies! Very clever.
OH BOY< THAT IS HILARIOUS !!! >
thanks, Ron!
However it's not clear where that Exhibit 1 comes from, aside from claims that he made that image himself. Does he have any historical records, like timestamped or archived emails, or something, that proves the origin of this Exhibit 1? This is a valid question; you know what they say about extraordinary claims.
IMO, the battle for the BC has been lost long ago, for many reasons. Not enough people in this minimally enlightened democracy give a rat's behind about legality of anything that happens in the government. This includes the legality of the President and unconstitutional laws made by Congress and supported by the judiciary. The populace just doesn't care. Many people simply don't have the intellectual capacity to understand any of that (but their right to vote is sacred.)
At this point Obama can be defeated only by his own policies - and he does everything in his power to defeat himself. He might be a "disposable President" who is installed for one term to do a specific task, no holds barred, and then he is set aside. Obama doesn't really like governing anyway.
loser
Loon ;).
Whats that quote supposed to prove?
Shows how dumb your theories are.
Orly, now this? Corsi is bottom fishin' in an attempt to sell his failure of a book.
Say it ain't so!!!! I have been called some pretty colorful things for asking questions of the esteemed Polarik way back when.
Maybe you know, is Rubio an NBC?
Another 'birther' on Obama's list of favorite kooks, if not working directly for an Obama minion. These people fall hard and the conservatives that stood with them look a bit silly.
...now you hurt my feelings...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.