Posted on 03/31/2011 5:54:49 AM PDT by Homer_J_Simpson
You're getting more opaque or evasive with each post.
But I will answer every one of your questions, and all of your objections right here:
From Stinnett's Notes section, page 320 --
"The author will deposit Day of Deceit’s entire research collection of cited documents, recorded audio and video tapes, photographs and graphics, including negatives, in his permanent collection housed at the Hoover Institution Archives, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
This collection will be open for public use."
In my mind, that is the answer to all of your questions about Stinnett's references -- if he did what he promised, then they are there for anyone to see.
And if it turns out, as seems likely, that he did make a mistake here or there, especially in the areas of interceptions and code-breaking, then serious scholars can evaluate them to see if they materially degrade Stinnett's basic thesis.
I doubt if they will.
But if Stinnett did not do what he publically promised, then I would have to agree with you that nothing he said in the book can be taken very seriously, until he does.
I’m evading nothing. I’m just not going to hold your hand with this anymore. It’s all there. Re-read and try again.
Nonsense.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.