Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

He estimates a roundtrip mission to the Martian moon Phobos, for example, could be made for less than $1 billion.

It depends on how large the spaceship is going to be, of course, but I don't think they could even get all that water to low earth orbit for a billion dollars. Interesting idea, though.

1 posted on 03/25/2011 12:01:43 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: LibWhacker
Lots of ice asteroids in orbit out there. Much cheaper than lifting water from earth.

/johnny

2 posted on 03/25/2011 12:05:33 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
Bad Title. This isn't water powered, it is solar powered.

Water is only the mechanism to transfer solar energy into motion.

It would be the same as calling our cars rubber powered since the tires provide the force against the road to move us.

3 posted on 03/25/2011 12:06:13 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer (biblein90days.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Read some interesting sci fi stories about this technology. The primary problem is having a platform to launch from in space.


4 posted on 03/25/2011 12:07:45 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Yeah, getting the water was my first thought as well. However not having to launch from earth is always a good idea.


5 posted on 03/25/2011 12:08:41 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

I’m not convinced they did the math.

What’s the specific impulse of water used in this way?


6 posted on 03/25/2011 12:11:17 PM PDT by Erasmus (I love "The Raven," but then what do I know? I'm just a poetaster.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
LOL! Just add water....

The problem is.... it will cost one hell of a lot of money to find water and then move it to a place where it can be put in the tank.

The practicalities of moving huge masses of water into and between orbits are not to be trifled with.

7 posted on 03/25/2011 12:12:47 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Steam-powered spaceship!


8 posted on 03/25/2011 12:13:21 PM PDT by agere_contra (As often as I look upon the cross, so often will I forgive with all my heart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

I spent last weekend at Old Sturbridge Village with my CubScout pack. Sturbridge is a museum set up as a replica of an early 1800’s New England village. While visiting the blacksmith’s shop, the smith qupped that back then everything was powered by fire and steam. My answer was that it still is...


9 posted on 03/25/2011 12:15:40 PM PDT by Jack of all Trades (Hold your face to the light, even though for the moment you do not see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
Electrothermal engines that use water as fuel, however, have not been flight-tested, so some work needs to be done on the propulsion system.

I wonder why they saved that for the third from last paragraph.

10 posted on 03/25/2011 12:19:47 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Half of all Americans are above average. Politicians come from the other half.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
That is sooooo cool. I had one when I was a kid. It was red. It looked like the Saturn V rocket. You filled it up with water to the line and then pumped it full of air. Pull the latch back and WHOOSH! Off to the moon.
12 posted on 03/25/2011 12:22:31 PM PDT by IrishCatholic (No local Communist or Socialist Party Chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
Steampunk...

Cool.

13 posted on 03/25/2011 12:25:55 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (explosive bolts, ten thousand volts at a million miles an hour)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
Excellent!


14 posted on 03/25/2011 12:28:30 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
It depends on how large the spaceship is going to be, of course, but I don't think they could even get all that water to low earth orbit for a billion dollars. Interesting idea, though.

They can get it from the moon

15 posted on 03/25/2011 12:46:57 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

I used to have one of those water rockets as a kid. You’d fill up the plastic rocket half full with water, then pump compressed air into it, pull the release latch, and the rocket would shoot up about 50 feet and land on the roof. Pretty fun stuff.


16 posted on 03/25/2011 12:57:19 PM PDT by Tar and Feathers (http://intensedebate.com/people/Tar_n_Feathers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Fund to dream about, even if it never happens. Collectivism has a way of crumpling these kinds of dreams and tossing them into the waste basket. People will be more occupied with dreaming of how to find a crust of bread.


18 posted on 03/25/2011 1:11:43 PM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Water weighs a lot (about 8.3 lbs per gallon), could it add to the amount of thrust needed to move and maneuver? There must be fuels with as great or greater energy capacity than water and less weight.

How many grams of Uranium would it take to power a small reactor to power a space ship for years? Would it’s reactor weigh more than all the weight needed for other fuels?

Our modern navies seem to think, for large ocean going vessels - aircraft carriers - and vessels with trips that last a very long time - strategic submarines, that nuclear power is the best? Why would space travel be any different?


19 posted on 03/25/2011 1:14:47 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

31 posted on 03/26/2011 5:42:03 AM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Radioactive plume to hit USA. President Obama and family fly to Brazil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KevinDavis; LibWhacker; annie laurie; garbageseeker; Knitting A Conundrum; Viking2002; ...
"It runs on *water*, man!"

Hyde
This is a little bit interesting; Asimov's standard engine for jettin' around the Solar System was fission-based, the nuclear pile heated water to steam.

 
X-Planets
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe ·
Google news searches: exoplanet · exosolar · extrasolar ·

42 posted on 03/26/2011 8:18:45 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Thanks Cincinna for this link -- http://www.friendsofitamar.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

43 posted on 03/27/2011 6:21:25 AM PDT by Dr. Sheldon Cooper (If Mohammed were alive today, he wouldnÂ’t be allowed to live within 1000 yards of a school.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: originalbuckeye; Kevmo; LuvFreeRepublic; LittleBillyInfidel; LucyT; HighWheeler; ChuckHam; ...



45 posted on 03/27/2011 5:35:16 PM PDT by KevinDavis (Where is Code Pink?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson