1) There are homosexuals; 2) Gender preference has nothing to do with patriotism; 3) A nation can ill afford to exclude patriots from serving their country.
Being in former unit command at the squadron level in the US Air Force, I was involved the Court-Martial and discharge of several homosexuals. They disrupted unit cohesion. Several were in supervisory roles and were harassing their subordinates. In all cases, their victims were young airmen and it took a few who had the courage to ID the perp. And before you get on your self-righteous high horse, I also was involved in the Court-Martial of officers who were found guilty of adultery, which was punishable under the Uniformed Code of Military Justice.
Not everyone who serves is a patriot. Some are there to push a social agenda. Some are there to play politics and use the army as a prop for their own grand plans, it’s not for patriotism that they’re there. I would not call Al Gore or John Kerry a patriot. The uniform meant nothing to them except a resume entry and something that could be used in their political campaigning.
Homosexualism is a mental disorder.
Homos tend to ignore repeated “NO” answers.
Homos will stalk and sexually harass their fellow soldiers, they will use any positions of authority they have to further this.
In the past, homos doing that were cashiered when caught.
Now?
You want your kids groped and harrassed by homos, and have zero legal recourse due to government ordered protection of homos?
That is what is coming.
Not every person gets to choose how they serve. Although they may be exceptionally patriotic, blind people don't make very good fighter pilots and chronic alcoholics don't make very good ship captains.
They aren’t excluded from serving. They just can’t be gay first. Now they can do that. It’s never been about service, it’s been about infestation.
Are you aware of Mr Robsinson's policy concerning the homosexual agenda?
“1) There are homosexuals; 2) Gender preference has nothing to do with patriotism; 3) A nation can ill afford to exclude patriots from serving their country.”
Unless I’m misinterpreting you, this is a pro-homosexual stance. Jim Robinson has been clear this is NOT acceptable on FR.
“3) A nation can ill afford to exclude patriots from serving their country.”
Good point. And just because I’m 52, I shouldn’t be restricted from flying and fighting. I’m a patriot!
Of course, I also was in Afghanistan in 2007, and 100 lbs of gear doesn’t carry as well as it used to...and my bifocals don’t help me shoot well, either. But I’m a patriot, so who cares?
Maybe you miss the obvious? What does government imposed acceptance of disordered sex have to do with patriotism -let alone the individual freedom, freedom of religion, nd self determination said patriotism defends?
NOTHING.
Support for the homosexual agenda is not wanted and not welcome on FR. I’ll thank you to leave it off.
That is patently not true. Service must be rendered by the fit. Homosexuals have mental disorders that affect many facits of their behavior and consequently their fitness.
There is no use disrupting the functionality of the larger whole for the sake of "feelings".