This stuff makes my head hurt if I think about it for too long, but I thought some of you might enjoy it! :)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last

Andromeda Island Universe
2 posted on
11/12/2010 1:19:57 PM PST by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have 'hobbies.' I'm developing a robust post-Apocalyptic skill set.)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
According to Hawking and Mlodinow, one consequence of the theory of quantum mechanics is that events in the past that were not directly observed did not happen... Does this mean Obama was never born, since there is no evidence of it?
3 posted on
11/12/2010 1:20:09 PM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(The people who hate Sarah Palin hate her because they know that her Presidency is inevitable.)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
“” one consequence of the theory of quantum mechanics is that events in the past that were not directly observed did not happen in a definite way.””
This is also called the Bart Simpson theory. “I didn’t do it. Nobody saw me do it. You can’t prove a thing.”
4 posted on
11/12/2010 1:21:52 PM PST by
getitright
(If you call this HOPE, can we give despair a shot?)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
This stuff does not answer my questions about what my wife did with the money
5 posted on
11/12/2010 1:24:25 PM PST by
woofie
To: Diana in Wisconsin
8 Shocking Things We Learned from Stephen Hawking's BookFor the most part, the only thing we learned is Hawking's theories. Some may be shocked by them. I must say, I was a little shocked to learn that Hawking thinks gravity can create something out of nothing.
6 posted on
11/12/2010 1:27:11 PM PST by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
I just bought the book this week. Very interesting so far.
I’ll try to find and post a video some astronomers made recently which shows how large the universe really is-that is the KNOWN universe they have found so far. My brain hurt just trying to conceptulize(sic) the huge numbers they were talking about.
To: Diana in Wisconsin
hugh ross makes more sense.
9 posted on
11/12/2010 1:29:13 PM PST by
ken21
(who runs the gop?)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
One of the most talked-about assertions in the whole book is that we don't need the idea of God to explain what sparked the creation of the universe. As far as I'm concerned, that makes everything else of no value. The hubris of Hawking is astounding. He also said:
There is a fundamental difference between religion, which is based on authority, compared to science, which is based on observation and reason. Science will win because it works.
Stephen Hawking may indeed possess a great deal of intelligence and have an impressive educational credentials but it's clear that he utterly lacks wisdom for "The fool has said in his heart, There is no God." (Psalm 14:1).
10 posted on
11/12/2010 1:30:13 PM PST by
re_nortex
(DP...that's what I like about Texas...)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
I, for one, suffer from Hawking Fatigue. I must be a bully.
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Typically, people reporting on scientific works simplify things to the point of absurdity. I suspect that that is what has occurred with this:
“Because there is a law such as gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing,” they write. “Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist.”
This is meaningless circular reasoning. I hope Hawkings and his friend were trying to assert something deeper.
To: SunkenCiv
13 posted on
11/12/2010 1:33:19 PM PST by
Las Vegas Dave
(To anger a Conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a Liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
14 posted on
11/12/2010 1:35:48 PM PST by
mad_as_he$$
(What flavor Kool-aid are you drinking?)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
events in the past that were not directly observed did not happen in a definite way. Instead they happened in all possible ways.
Awesome! If I understand the theory correctly, that means I've slept with every woman who ever existed, using every possible position, except for the ones I actually did sleep with, provided that I was being videotaped at the time.
16 posted on
11/12/2010 1:38:08 PM PST by
Question Liberal Authority
(Worst. Post-Racial. And Post-Partisan. Agent Of Hope And Change. EVER.)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
A 1-watt night-light emits a billion billion photons each second.
We're going to need them, too. If Al Gore has his way.
17 posted on
11/12/2010 1:39:19 PM PST by
Question Liberal Authority
(Worst. Post-Racial. And Post-Partisan. Agent Of Hope And Change. EVER.)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
one consequence of the theory of quantum mechanics is that events in the past that were not directly observed did not happen in a definite way. Instead they happened in all possible ways.Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools
23 posted on
11/12/2010 1:46:30 PM PST by
JOAT
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Who was it that went to a bookstore in DC and inserted notes in the stack of Hawking books, that everyone bought years ago out of, let’s face it, pity for the poor cripple, and to make themselves feel good, stuck the notes around page 25 or so, saying please reply to such and such address to receive $50. No one read that far, and no one replied.
To: Diana in Wisconsin
"Because there is a law such as gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing," they write. "Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist."Round and round we go, where we stop nobody knows. And that includes Hawking's circular arguments.
26 posted on
11/12/2010 1:51:08 PM PST by
jwalsh07
To: Diana in Wisconsin
So Hawking et al use the “fishbowl” metaphor to assert that there is no universally (!) valid perception ...
Does anyone else appreciate the paradox in asserting (absolutely) that there are no absolutes? And that, “judging from my perspective, there are no valid perspectives.”
It reminds me of a liberal who once told me “It’s always wrong to generalize.”
28 posted on
11/12/2010 1:55:33 PM PST by
IronJack
(=)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
7. Quarks are never lonely Quarks, the adorably named building blocks of protons and neutrons, come only in groups, never alone... Protons and neutrons are both made of three quarks. (Protons contain two "up"-flavored quarks and one "down," while neutrons have two downs and one up.)
If I were a Quark, I'd take two down.
29 posted on
11/12/2010 1:56:10 PM PST by
UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
(REPEAL WASHINGTON! -- Islam Delenda Est! -- I Want Constantinople Back. -- Rumble thee forth.)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Stephen has finally discovered his brain has no continuum.
End of research;)
31 posted on
11/12/2010 1:57:08 PM PST by
sodpoodle
(Despair; man's surrender. Laughter; God 's redemption.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson