Posted on 10/09/2010 4:25:35 AM PDT by lysie
Edited on 10/09/2010 4:49:25 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator. [history]
Last night I read an article by Dr. Paul L. Williams. In the article Dr. Williams states that the Obama adminstration will give $4 billion of our tax dollars to the UN Global Fund to fight AIDS, TB and malaria. That's a 38% increase over other years. They are dreadful diseases, for sure, but at a time when many people are unemployed is that wise?
Awwww, prairie, how sweet of you to say that. :))
I'm still on about page 202.
Oh! I like that. Cute.
Good Morning. I don’t get here very often, lately. The thugs are dropping extremely negative stuff against me. It can’t be over soon enough to suit me.
Hang in there!
Prayers for your victory!!
This may be just the tip of the iceberg...Let’s probe deeper...what’s REALLY going on in your head???..;-)))
Speaking of heads, mine is very "fuzzy" this a.m.
IG, it's almost over, thank goodness, and you have some excellent company in the defamed and slandered circle...
Carolina, where are these articles?? I hope I can find a few and read them....
Please help me remember WHO used the phrase “Nattering Nebobs of Negativity”. I know it was a Lib. Just can’t remember which one.
Now I know what he was talking about. There’s just vicious stuff in the mail and on the TV.
Sent you a request on FB
I thought it was Spiro Agnew?
Actually it was William Safire in a speech he wrote for Spiro Agnew.
Very good!! You have to get up real early to fool the folks at ATRW!
Energized GOP can thank the tea party Wash Post...I would say "tea parties"!...
Interview with Dr. Tim Bell "climate change".....
Presidency on the verge of a nervous breakdown... London Telegraph
Well, I don’t think I want to quote Agnew. Perhaps I’d better credit Safire.
The phrase perfectly fames the situation here.
On Looking Bad October 9, 2010 4:08 P.M.
By Victor Davis Hanson
Almost unremarked upon was one of Barack Obamas more revealing recent statements, when campaigning in Maryland this week. At one point, he warned his crowd of supporters to get out to vote in order to prevent his own embarrassment in November: Dont make me look bad, now. Since he is not up for reelection, apparently the president means that the slaughter of perhaps 50 Democratic congressional representatives and 8-10 senators will reflect poorly upon himself. Of course it will, but he might have instead phrased his dilemma in terms of worry about his supporters fates rather than his own, inasmuch as most all voted for his agenda, despite the fact that almost all elements of it polled poorly with the American people. After November, many will be out of a job, not he and yet his concern seems to be the public perception of his own godhead, not their unemployment.
I read an article at O dark thiry a couple of weeks ago about the poor morale among Democrat staffers on the Hill. They are angry about being put out on the street during a poor economy where good jobs are hard to find.
It’s all about them.
What else is new.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.