Posted on 06/25/2010 9:43:42 AM PDT by Polarik
Sometime between October 31, 2008, and July 27, 2009, the dates of Health Director Chiyome Fukino's two press releases, Hawaii amended Obama's birth record. A brand-new Certificate of Live Birth (not Certification of Live Birth) was issued to him.
The DOH Director decides what goes in or gets taken out of birth records. She went on record as saying that "President Obama posted a copy of his certificate on his campaign website" even though she has refused to authenticate it for the past two years. This created a conundrum that could only be resolved by changing Obama's birth records to match what is in that online copy - which is a stone-cold forgery, and Fukino knows it!
That forged COLB also has its origin within the DOH: watch the video to find out the shocking truth as to whose COLB was used for the forgery.
You'll also realize that you've been staring at a forgery this whole time and not realizing that the most obvious sign of it was right there under your noses.
Not only did Obama get a new birth certificate, the certificate itself was designed with him in mind as Rev. 10/08 - coincidentally, the date of Fukino's first press release (10/31/08). Hawaii ditched the old Certification of Live Birth and switched to a hybrid form called a “Certificate of Live Birth” - formerly the name of the long-form birth certificate.
Say, "Aloha" to Obama's new COLB (Certificate of Live Birth):
Click on the thumbnail for a full-size copy
There should not be perfectly straight lines in any of the clothing.
IIRC Fred Nerks thinks it was to show Obama Sr.’s presence there in Hawaii when in reality he wasn’t there at that time. Why it was important to locate him there, I cannot remember but Fred will.
Yes, I saw that when I enlarged it. Her neck looks a bit wrong, too. Some highlights where they shouldn’t be - too shiny.
Somehow I must believe that in the worst case scenario our US military will stand with the Constitution and oust the communists in a Joe McCarthy moment. That would be great!
I was initially referring to the Photo shown at #451 on the dock(?). We have an avid obamanite (FINO) here claiming that Sr. flew into Hawaii and not by "boat"!!
However, I take your last line to be part of that answer!!!
Like I said to you before, if lying on the web was a crime, the libs you shill for would be in jail.
Why that would be as “obvious” a mistake as counterfeiting twenty dollar bills and putting Thomas Jefferson’s face on them.
You are a silly clown. When presented with proof that you are wrong, you deny deny deny....
In a rare candid moment from Obama's mouth piece Robert Gibbs:
"Asked why the issue of Mr. Obama’s birthplace keeps coming up, he replied: “Because for $15 you can get an internet address and say whatever you want.”"
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2506056/posts
So Gibbels admits that they can "say whatever you want" for $15 dollars. Unbelievable. As in fooling the public with lies.
But then perhaps its not “obvious” and not a “mistake” to rational people at all.
You are not rational people.
You're right. Why should I want to trust a Republican-run state government or a non-partisan fact-checking website (because obviously they're part of an insidious and widespread conspiracy to cover up the secret truth) when I obviously should want to pin my trust on such people as:
- a convicted forger who spent three years in prison;
- a fake 'expert' who spent a year pretending to have expertise and credentials that he didn't possess, and who's also faked evidence;
- incompetent attorneys who've repeatedly been suckered by fake 'evidence' that they didn't make the slightest effort to authenticate; and
- anonymous online armchair attorneys schooled at the University of Google with legal theories that they can't get a single legal scholar to agree with.
Similarly, I'm beginning to suspect that NASA is lying about the moon landing; I've seen some very persuasive videos on YouTube by some guy, and I haven't seen any official statements by NASA rebutting some of his claims. And there's apparently a big conspiracy to cover up the fact that you don't have to pay income taxes; I always thought I did, but apparently I've been putting my trust in the wrong people.
Fabricating Obama’s history since all of the actual records are still being withheld.
Obama is the ultimate undocumented worker.
There are a whole slew of photos that have been fabricated to show Obama in places where he’s never been. The analyses of them are all throughout FR, and I also think that the Post & Email has a few. I know that I also did a few.
Places where he’s been shown to be such as Harvard, Occidental, Columbia, Punahou, at the airport with Obama Sr., sitting on the grass with Maya, and so on.
There are far more faked photos than real ones.
He’s like Forrest Gump.
I can just see you hunched over the key board having just hit the ‘enter’ key for your post, which you did with a slight flourish. You straightened up, pushed away from the desk and, as the chair was rolling back, you stuck both arms up in the air with fists clenched. “OMG I’m so clever - take that you birther loser!” But it was sad, too, because there was no one there to appreciate all that you do for your master.
Ping
Maybe you should look into all the post from 451 to 468???
Now you may take a closer look at the black sailor's "spot-free white uniform" looks like it had been soaking in a bleach bath for a long time!!!
Ping-a-roony!
First page, Yosemitest has a an excellent post.
New info for me, in Y’s post, that at the time of Stanley’s divorce from Obie1, the divorce papers list their child as being born in Kenya.
Awesome post!
: )
(from a Constitutionalist, not a birther)
Could he be referring to his own "bio"???
Well, he get his talking points from different internet sources where he also posts, hmmm!!!
So...Lingle covered,....how did the AG not cover (at the end of the vid) ?
You go ahead and call some of these talking heads and bring up your dear leader's NBC status and see how long you last before they hit the panic button and cut you off. They don't want to discuss it under any circumstances, yet it's a valid point to discuss!!
Coulter would NOT have a gig on FOX if she did, so instead she verbally viciously attack you as a total moron. I have tried it here with the local Todd Schnitt who even boycott my e-mail after confronting him. He is even worse than Coulter and Whoraldo. Glenn Book mentioned that he is scared for his life when he started at FOX!!!
So give us an intelligent explanation why this issue is TOTAL blocked from discussing on air???
So WHAT is he, YOU tell us???
Exactly, which part of “NO personal attacks” did you NOT understand?
Do you really want to go, there, Loren? I have stayed away from it because you do not deserve any attention whatsoever.
But, if you really want to go there, without making a personal attack, I will say that everything you and your boyfriend have said about me is enough garbage to fill the Grand Canyon 100 times over.
You made yourself into a folk hero among the Left, claiming that you “outed” me when you did no such thing.
Once my legal name was on the Internet, any idiot could have Googled it and found several million hits because I HAVE 40 years of credentials, and I HAVE the credentials to back up everything I've said and done.
Did you, or your boyfriend, or your lib friends know that the word, “IMAGE” is nowhere to be found in Neil Krawetz’s credentials. Krawetz is NOT an image analysis expert, not by any stretch of the imagination. He is a computer security expert.
All he knows how to do is run software. He reeadily admits that he cannot spot forgeries with his naked eyes and admires those who can. Everything that he has done with the COLBs, I have also done and 100 other things that he cannot do.
Krawetz KNOWS the COLB image is bogus but he has deliberately hidden the evidence that proves it. But because he's a Socialist liberal, he sides with Obama and you guys.
Yes, you read that right. Krawetz believes in spreading around the wealth and why it would be a good thing for everyone to be poor.
Krawetz also said that a person learns a skill to apply to a job - he does not learn a skill while he is on the job.
That’s why he discounted everywhere I put down in my affidavit that I have worked with computers, scanners, and printers for over 30 years. Krawetz thinks that what he learned about scans and printouts from a book or in class for 30 minutes a day is superior to actually making scans and printouts for 30 years.
As it turns out, I'm the only one who practices what HE preaches.
But, you merely parroted everything he said, without question, because he has a PhD in Computer Science, as if that qualifies him to do anything and everything with computers.
It is you who are completely incapable of reading and interpreting my credentials, just as you do not even know what you write on your own blog!
Speaking of that blog, you turned it over to my Internet psychostalker: an insanely jealous, pathological liar who ran his mouth off about me on your blog exactly like he did on his own blog, and just like he did on every single blog and forum he joined for the sole purpose of trashing me.
This guy is a BIRTHER and he coined the expression, “funky border” claiming it as proof the COLB is a forgery.
But, he became anti-Polarik, and it did not matter on which side of the issue I was on - he would still be trashing me.
He has ZERO credentials, ZERO college degrees, ZERO training in graphics, and ZERO accomplishments of any kind in his life.
But, given you know less about graphics than he does, you teamed up with him.
Google his name and you'll be lucky to get more than two hits - both of which is to your blog.
When he is not in his own fantasy world, he makes stereo wires for a living.
Everything he said, and you said, is totally and categorically false. I have never lied about my credentials and never faked anything.
Now, I did intentionally jerk around the libtards who were so intent on literally interpreting my online affidavits by switching the degree title's around, but the affidavits I signed and submitted to Berg, Taitz, Keyes, Hochberg, etc., had my actual credentials and experiences.
I CAN spot forgeries with my naked eyes and I CAN and HAVE corroborated those observations over two years and 1,500 hours of painstaking research.
But, like true scientists, when new data becomes available, you modify your theories to fit.
You and your boyfriend are still stuck in the Summer of 2008 when nobody had ever seen a real 2007 COLB.
The fact that you are incapable of going onto the Florida State University website and actually reading the descriptions of the focus areas of my degrees, is not my fault.
Nor is it my fault that you do not understand the difference between a degree major, a program major, and a program track.
But, clearly, you have no idea what “forensics” means, or “digital imaging,” or even know how to do true research (you copy very well, though).
I never said I was a “forensics” anything, even though the research I've done for two years IS exactly what forensics scientists do.
The word, “forensics” appears a total of three (3) times in my 260,000 word final report and they all refer to Factcheck, not me.
This is the same 260,000 word, 160 page, 210+ image final report that you never read and your boyfriend refused to read.
He said, and I quote, “I don't have time to read through all of this” so he goes back to July 2008 and totally twists what I said.
He spent several months spewing total garbage about me, but he “doesn't have the time” to read a research report that has been online since September 2008?
That is the epitome of BS.
He also is famous for going into my Photobucket account, which now has over 1,000 images, and - before I locked them down, he would pull them off, without knowing anything about them, and then make false claims.
For example, there is a copy of Michele's COLB that had the Seal penciled over. He accused me of doing that when, in reality, Michele did it.
By the way, there was another image of Michele's COLB that he displayed on YOUR blog which he describe, and I quote, “It looks exactly like the Kos image.”
I only have a few hundred Michele COLB images, but the one he pulled off and touting as being the same - which is a ludicrous statement - was one I modified. So, I'll take that as a compliment.
Bottom line is, Loren, you do not know diddly-squat about anything having to do with Obama’s birth certificate.
YOU QUOTE FACTCHECK CHAPTER AND VERSE.
That alone disqualifies you from this conversation.
Because it has no rational support and only exists as an issue in the minds of a few folks on the fringe who can't be bothered to think the issue through clearly?
If you’re willing to pin your trust on bureaucrats who have been documented engaging in criminal activity, there’s not much I can do to help you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.