1 posted on
06/15/2010 6:36:51 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
To: SunkenCiv
3 posted on
06/15/2010 6:40:36 PM PDT by
Vaquero
(Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: SunkenCiv
“In other words, these differences are so large that it is highly improbable that the earliest inhabitants of the New World were the direct ancestors of recent Native American populations.”
This is very troubling from a legal standpoint. What happens when the descendants of the earlier inhabitants want to open up casinos, all the good locations are already taken.
4 posted on
06/15/2010 6:44:10 PM PDT by
Recon Dad
( Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things)
To: SunkenCiv
They’ve been doing this for years. The morphology between the ancients and moderns looks different but the genetics say they’re the same. I go with the genetics. Animal studies have shown that morphology can change radically in a few thousand years.
6 posted on
06/15/2010 6:46:01 PM PDT by
Varda
To: SunkenCiv
Meanwhile, the Caucasian skull recovered from a riverbed in Oregon has been suppressed.
To: SunkenCiv
Skulls show New World was settled twice: studyExcellent, 2 more national holidays!
To: SunkenCiv
So the people who call themselves Native Americans are descended from a group of people who came here and stole the land from its previous inhabitants? :)
12 posted on
06/15/2010 7:06:24 PM PDT by
pnh102
(Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
To: SunkenCiv
Why else do you think “native americans” screech and demand that any recently discovered skulls be immediately reburied before they can be studied?
To: SunkenCiv
Two distinct groups from Asia settled in the New World and not one single migration as suggested by previous genetic studies, experts said Monday after comparing the skulls of early Americans.
Isn't there evidence of other, non-Asian, people?
18 posted on
06/15/2010 7:26:33 PM PDT by
aruanan
To: SunkenCiv
Jareites and Nephites, this is old news.
23 posted on
06/15/2010 7:46:12 PM PDT by
Grig
To: SunkenCiv
Skull morphology is a rather poor way of supporting a theory. Genetic studies already pointed toward several distinct groups of people and admixtures of peoples forming Native American populations.
To: SunkenCiv
'Mormons?'
...I'm just asking.
26 posted on
06/15/2010 7:59:03 PM PDT by
Tainan
(Cogito, ergo conservatus)
To: SunkenCiv
Keep looking! (further back)
We already know there were people here before Younger Dryas.
34 posted on
06/16/2010 4:27:38 AM PDT by
wolfcreek
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
To: SunkenCiv
Wonder if these guys were included in the study?

Both are apparently American
42 posted on
06/16/2010 7:34:23 AM PDT by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 . Ostracize Democrats. There can be no Democrat friends.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson