Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stacking the deck: Single photons observed at seemingly faster-than-light speeds
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) ^ | Jan 26, 2010 | Unknown

Posted on 01/26/2010 4:17:25 PM PST by decimon

Researchers at the Joint Quantum Institute (JQI), a collaboration of the National Institute of Standards and Technology and the University of Maryland at College Park, can speed up photons (particles of light) to seemingly faster-than-light speeds through a stack of materials by adding a single, strategically placed layer. This experimental demonstration confirms intriguing quantum-physics predictions that light's transit time through complex multilayered materials need not depend on thickness, as it does for simple materials such as glass, but rather on the order in which the layers are stacked. This is the first published study* of this dependence with single photons.

Strictly speaking, light always achieves its maximum speed in a vacuum, or empty space, and slows down appreciably when it travels through a material substance, such as glass or water. The same is true for light traveling through a stack of dielectric materials, which are electrically insulating and can be used to create highly reflective structures that are often used as optical coatings on mirrors or fiber optics.

In a follow up to earlier experimental measurements (see "A Sub-femtosecond Stop Watch for 'Photon Finish' Races", NIST Tech Beat, March 14, 2008.), the JQI researchers created stacks of approximately 30 dielectric layers, each about 80 nanometers thick, equivalent to about a quarter of a wavelength of the light traveling through it. The layers alternated between high (H) and low (L) refractive index material, which cause light waves to bend or reflect by varying amounts. After a single photon hits the boundary between the H and L layers, it has a chance of being reflected or passing through.

When encountering a stack of 30 layers alternating between L and H, the rare photons that completely penetrate the stack pass through in about 12.84 femtoseconds (fs, quadrillionths of a second). Adding a single low-index layer to the end of this stack disproportionately increased the photon transit time by 3.52 fs to about 16.36 fs. (The transit time through this added layer would be only about 0.58 fs, if it depended only upon the layer's thickness and refractive index.) On the contrary, adding an extra H layer to a stack of 30 layers alternating between H and L would reduce the transit time to about 5.34 fs, so that individual photons seem to emerge through the 2.6-micron-thick stack at superluminal (faster-than-light) speeds.

What the JQI researchers are seeing can be explained by the wave properties of light. In this experiment, the light begins and ends its existence acting as a particle—a photon. But when one of these photons hits a boundary between the layers of material, it creates waves at each surface, and the traveling light waves interfere with each other just as opposing ocean waves cause a riptide at the beach. With the H and L layers arranged just right, the interfering light waves combine to give rise to transmitted photons that emerge early. No faster than light speed information transfer occurs because, in actuality, it is something of an illusion: only a small proportion of photons make it through the stack, and if all the initial photons were detected, the detectors would record photons over a normal distribution of times.

###

* N. Borjemscaia, S.V. Polyakov, P.D. Lett and A. Migdall, Single-photon propagation through dielectric bandgaps, Optics Express, published online Jan. 21, 2010, doi:10.1364/OE.18.002279.


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: stringtheory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 01/26/2010 4:17:26 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Outta sight ping.


2 posted on 01/26/2010 4:18:08 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

I’ve been saying that for years... finally Researchers at the Joint Quantum Institute can back me up !!


3 posted on 01/26/2010 4:19:16 PM PST by maddog55 (OBAMA, Why stupid people shouldn't vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

could this provide an insight to someday producing FTL drives for space vessles?


4 posted on 01/26/2010 4:19:30 PM PST by ak267
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: decimon; KevinDavis

fire photon torpedos!!


5 posted on 01/26/2010 4:23:10 PM PST by GeronL (http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

I took some of the pills to speed up my metabolism but all it did was make me nervous and give me an upset stomach. That faster than light thing never happened to though.


6 posted on 01/26/2010 4:28:13 PM PST by BipolarBob (My bodyguard is a 6'3" pooka named Harvey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Ah yes, the usual escape clause: ‘seem to’.


7 posted on 01/26/2010 4:28:26 PM PST by MHGinTN (Obots, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ak267

There isn’t any thrust involved when the “new” photon comes out of the other end.


8 posted on 01/26/2010 4:29:27 PM PST by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: maddog55
I’ve been saying that for years...

Me too.

"So, is it faster than light or not?"

"Yes."

9 posted on 01/26/2010 4:29:27 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Those SINGLE protons would be the bachelors who just heard their date say something about settling down... ;-P


10 posted on 01/26/2010 4:31:57 PM PST by MortMan (Stubbing one's toes is a valid (if painful) way of locating furniture in the dark.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Its gotta be hard to measure, the stopwatch only went to femtoseconds.


11 posted on 01/26/2010 4:33:06 PM PST by GeronL (http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: decimon
It's always good to read something from the frontiers of good, clean, politics-free science. Thanks for posting!

.


12 posted on 01/26/2010 4:33:24 PM PST by Oceander (The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance -- Thos. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Scotty knew that years ago ...


13 posted on 01/26/2010 4:34:55 PM PST by SkyDancer (But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tuketu; BattleHymn; Squawk 8888; Dimez_Recon; The SISU kid; Empireoftheatom48; Rio; hattend; ...


For other space news go to: http://www.spacetoday.net
For a list of Private Space Companies: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_private_spaceflight_companies


14 posted on 01/26/2010 4:43:15 PM PST by KevinDavis (Ad Astra Per Aspera!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve86

okay....what about FTL communications?


15 posted on 01/26/2010 4:44:55 PM PST by ak267
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: decimon

At some point, someone will make a major theoretical breakthrough that will explain the mysterious wave-particle duality of electromagnetic radiation and radically change the understanding of energy, matter, space, time and gravity.

I expect that this theory will be resisted by the establishment much more fiercely than were Einstein’s relativity theories or quantum mechanics theory, because it will call into question the absoluteness of the fixed time scales laid down by Hawking and others based on a maximum speed “c” of light.


16 posted on 01/26/2010 4:47:09 PM PST by SirJohnBarleycorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ak267

The phone rings before you hit SEND? heh.

Could we talk to ET without the wait times?


17 posted on 01/26/2010 4:53:35 PM PST by GeronL (http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: decimon

“386,000 miles per second. It’s not just a good idea. It’s the law.”


18 posted on 01/26/2010 4:54:37 PM PST by LiberConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiberConservative
“386,000 miles per second. It’s not just a good idea. It’s the law.”

Honest, officer, my pedal was stuck.

19 posted on 01/26/2010 5:02:59 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: decimon

“386,000 miles per second. It’s not just a good idea. It’s the law.
Honest, officer, my pedal was stuck.”
Camry or Corrola?


20 posted on 01/26/2010 5:25:43 PM PST by outofsalt ("If History teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson