[xzins]

Assuming that I sued and some judge decided to look at it:

Would he conclude that I, Xzins Q Citizen, have standing simply because I care about the constitution? If I don’t have standing, then why don’t I?

[Kolokotronis]

“Would he conclude that I, Xzins Q Citizen, have standing simply because I care about the constitution?”

No

“If I don’t have standing, then why don’t I?”

Because you do not have any “particularized injury” on account of what some believe, but certainly have never established, is a constitutional violation.

[little jeremiah]

From all the “how many legalisms can dance on the head of a pin” arguments, it seems as though basic Constitutional verites mean nothing now. All that matters is who the Big Dog is. And if the Big Dog became big due to fraud, lying, theft, or any other crimes, it doesn’t matter.

We have ceased, then, being citizens and are now subjects.