“Would he conclude that I, Xzins Q Citizen, have standing simply because I care about the constitution?”
No
“If I don’t have standing, then why don’t I?”
Because you do not have any “particularized injury” on account of what some believe, but certainly have never established, is a constitutional violation.
Got it. Since no one’s PROVEN an offense, I can’t have standing to sue someone over something I can’t even demonstrate has actually happened to me.
Is that it?
Establishing such facts is what trials, discovery, etc are about.
If J.Q. Citizen no longer has standing to sue to enforce the Constitution, the Constitution is a dead letter and it is time for the final box. I hope that does not turn out to be true.
If there would be a full legal, adversarial examination of the issue, with the full appeals process played out on the issue of his father's lack of citizenship, and Obama were found to be fully eligible, then so be it, and we continue to fight his agenda.