1 posted on
10/06/2009 7:13:37 AM PDT by
Nikas777
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
To: Quix; SunkenCiv
For your ping list consideration. I don’t generally believe this stuff but I keep an open mind about it and it is much fun to read about and speculate on.
2 posted on
10/06/2009 7:14:48 AM PDT by
Nikas777
(En touto nika, "In this, be victorious")
To: Nikas777
Scientists found that the ore of this mine contained abnormally low proportions of U235 such as found only in depleted uranium fuel taken from atomic reactors.So please tell us how an ancient civilization mined uranium, enriched it, and then put back the depleted uranium as ore again.
3 posted on
10/06/2009 7:18:29 AM PDT by
dirtboy
To: Nikas777
4 posted on
10/06/2009 7:18:39 AM PDT by
AD from SpringBay
(We deserve the government we allow.)
To: Nikas777
“This has all happened before... and it will happen again.”
6 posted on
10/06/2009 7:21:45 AM PDT by
benjibrowder
(For Neda. May God bless those fighting for freedom.)
To: Nikas777
Albion W. Hart, one of the first engineers to graduate from Massachusetts Institute of Technology, was assigned a project in the interior of Africa. While he and his men were traveling to an almost inaccessible region, they had first to cross a great expanse of desert. At the time, he was puzzled and quite unable to explain a large area of greenish glass which covered the sands as far as he could see. "Later on during his life," wrote Margarethe Casson in Rocks and Minerals (No. 396, 1972), "he passed by the White Sands area after the first atomic explosion there, and he recognized the same type of silica fusion which he had seen fifty years earlier in the African desert."
MIT was founded in 1861. Let's say that Hart graduated in 1870 at the age of 22 (I'm being generous here).
Trinity happened in 1945. That's seventy-five years. Hart would have been 92 at the time of the explosion. And I doubt he would have been able to go anywhere near the site until after he was 100.
The only references I could find to Albion W. Hart were circular - the same reference recycled across mutiple website entries interested in this subject. I call bogus.
7 posted on
10/06/2009 7:26:56 AM PDT by
dirtboy
To: Nikas777
Maybe the Apocalypse already happened, and the promise God made that the next devastation would be fire and not flood has already occured. Maybe the whole story is racial memory, and we’re just building a palimpsest civilization on the ruins of the true world.
8 posted on
10/06/2009 7:27:26 AM PDT by
Little Pig
(Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici.)
To: Nikas777
The Book of Geniuses starts out with the Earth that was - and it was null and void. Each seed grew after it's own kind, as if the seed was already here. That means the Earth was already here and renovated. There very well could have been other life forms before us.
In many different Religions, there have been "ages" before ours. I think it was the Aztec's (?) that claimed there have been 6 ages, or Earths, before ours. This one is suppose to be the last chance.
Yeah. I can believe the Earth was used before. Why not?
To: Nikas777
Interesting article, but it begs one enormous question: Nowhere in the article does it mention radioactivity - certainly even thousands of years later, there should be some residue detectable by Geiger counter.
11 posted on
10/06/2009 7:32:34 AM PDT by
mkleesma
(`Call to me, and I will answer you and tell you great and unsearchable things you do not know.')
To: Nikas777
13 posted on
10/06/2009 7:35:14 AM PDT by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: Nikas777
The problem with the Ancients were as technically advanced as us hypothesis is plastic & aluminum
If the ancients were able to make nuclear bombs than they most certainly would have been able to make plastic and being that plastic last forever, where are the plastics artifacts?
If Obama drives to world into a Mad Max scenario and/or the ice age comes back, 100000 years from now, some future archaeologist will still find my Styrofoam clam shell that my Big Mac came in back in 1975.
Same with Aluminum, up until modern smeltering techniques 75 years ago, Aluminum was rarer than gold. Where are the Aluminum artifacts?
20 posted on
10/06/2009 7:49:02 AM PDT by
qam1
(There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
To: Nikas777
22 posted on
10/06/2009 7:57:32 AM PDT by
eclecticEel
(The Most High rules in the kingdom of men ... and sets over it the basest of men.)
To: Nikas777
Residual radiation well above normal background count should last for thousands of years. If it’s not there, it wasn’t nukes.
25 posted on
10/06/2009 8:03:53 AM PDT by
JimRed
("Hey, hey, Teddy K., hot enough down there today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
To: Nikas777
...too many Baghdad batteries in one place...
27 posted on
10/06/2009 8:05:26 AM PDT by
BCW
(http://babylonscovertwar.com)
To: Nikas777
Didn't anyone on this thread see the end of Battle Star Galactica?
29 posted on
10/06/2009 8:06:11 AM PDT by
Ronon
To: Nikas777
Why nuclear war? A solar mass ejection would do the same thing...
35 posted on
10/06/2009 8:15:39 AM PDT by
PugetSoundSoldier
(Indignation over the Sting of Truth is the Defense of the Indefensible)
To: Nikas777
Hmmmm, I wonder if the effects of a nuclear explosion can go back in time. Some of those sites sound like ones that will be nuked in the future... ( Works if earth is like the inside of a train...)
36 posted on
10/06/2009 8:20:00 AM PDT by
GOPJ
(MSM BIAS: the most grossly obvious facts can be ignored when they are unwelcome. George Orwell)
To: Nikas777
When God decides to destroy a city he does not need to use nuclear bombs.
37 posted on
10/06/2009 8:22:31 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(Brave amateurs....they do their part.)
To: Nikas777
I watched a documentary about “how the earth was formed” and they spent a lot of time talking about the Libyan fused green glass. They showed pretty conclusive evidence that it was from a meteor. There was rock present with high iron content that wasn’t native to the area and a large impact crater.
39 posted on
10/06/2009 8:24:51 AM PDT by
mbynack
(Retired USAF SMSgt)
To: Nikas777
I don’t need any of your proofs of pre-historic nuclear wars and the way you worship them as idols; I believe in the ONE TRUE nuclear war on FAITH alone.
uhh, sorry, I got lost over here on this thread after wandering over here from the Shroud of Turin thread....
45 posted on
10/06/2009 11:52:18 AM PDT by
Nabber
To: Nikas777
46 posted on
10/06/2009 11:55:42 AM PDT by
The Louiswu
(I live vicariously, through myself.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson