Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anyone Else See MSNBC's Maddow Get Pwned By Ridge Tonight? (EPIC FAIL!)
My own eyes | 9-1-09 | Vanity I had to ask

Posted on 09/01/2009 9:06:24 PM PDT by icwhatudo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: icwhatudo

The word ‘homeland’ is creepy to her? Ridge: “Read the book not the dust jacket.” LOL!


21 posted on 09/01/2009 9:38:10 PM PDT by divine_moment_of_facts (“Cap and Trade bill tells us how to live.. Health Care bill tells us how to die.” Bauer and Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

She looks like that character named “Pat” that was on “Saturday Night Live” years ago, you couldn’t tell if it was a man or woman.


22 posted on 09/01/2009 9:38:16 PM PDT by Contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Contra

Unfortunately, “Pat” was satire ~ an SNL skit.

In Butch’s case, she is a real person and she has her own televison show and she is trying to impose her own reality on the former Secretary of Homeland Security.

Personally, I can’t decide if she is an ugly woman or a fugly woman?


23 posted on 09/01/2009 9:47:01 PM PDT by incredulous joe ("Live Free or Fight")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo
It was funny how she quickly got all her little points in at the end of the interview, all the points she had planned to make through the interview (and hoped Ridge would be agreeing with them)but she found he wasn't on the page she thought he was on.

I noticed she's on at 9 pm. Hannity must be blowing her away. This video is the first time I've ever watched her show.

24 posted on 09/01/2009 9:58:25 PM PDT by FrdmLvr ("The people will believe what the media tells them they believe." Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

The threat level was NOT raised. Evidently there was some discussion about the threat level following OBLs video just prior to the election.

Ridge is an a$$.


25 posted on 09/01/2009 10:06:54 PM PDT by Carley (WHEN YOU HONOR THE DISHONORABLE YOU SHOW YOUR OWN TRUE COLORS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PittsburghAfterDark
Unless an individuals sexual preferences, race, gender.... are relevant to the discussion, leave it out of your posts. Maddows sexual preferences were not relevant to the issue at hand. Bringing up her sexual preferences when it is not relevant is a tactic you should leave to the liberals. Dont lower yourself
26 posted on 09/01/2009 10:12:21 PM PDT by Salmonslayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

Well... Maddow did not get what she wanted from Ridge, but, I think she handled it fairly well and was civil.

There was no there , there. She could not get any traction on her agenda, but, Pwned? Nope, not in my opinion.I have seen the same thing happen to conservative talk show hosts too.

BFD


27 posted on 09/01/2009 10:13:00 PM PDT by Salmonslayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PittsburghAfterDark

She needs an Addadicktomy. Maybe Obamacare will cover it.


28 posted on 09/01/2009 10:33:30 PM PDT by screaminsunshine (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo
As I have posted before, Maddow is a very attractive young man and occupies all of my homosexual fantasies.
29 posted on 09/01/2009 10:36:27 PM PDT by dersepp (I am an Angry, Brooks Bros. Mob of One)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salmonslayer

She’s a dyke. She thinks she’s a man. She’s insane. Get over it.


30 posted on 09/01/2009 10:42:42 PM PDT by chris37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Salmonslayer; PittsburghAfterDark
Unless an individuals sexual preferences, race, gender.... are relevant to the discussion, leave it out of your posts.

LOL, Is that the Maddow rule now as laid down by you?

31 posted on 09/01/2009 10:43:42 PM PDT by ansel12 (Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Salmonslayer

“Well... Maddow did not get what she wanted from Ridge, but, I think she handled it fairly well and was civil.”

Actually, I would have interviewed Ridge just as she did, which was to ask Ridge in 20 different ways the same questions about the controversial passages in his book. The reason being, each time she asked him, you could see Ridge looking down, barely making eye contact, looking shifty and lying through his teeth. She knew it, he knew it, and she gave everyone the opportunity multiple times to examine Ridge’s body language which wasn’t good as he was lying over and over again.

I can’t stand Maddow, but in this particular case, she had a liar on her hands, knew it, tried to play it up, and although she couldn’t crack him on his responses, she could show to the public someone incredibly unconfortable with answering her questions. I can’t stand Ridge, a RINO from the gitgo, a liar, as political as those he was accusing about raising the security level, it’s just that his politics are to say something he knew would be controversial in order to sell his book. Talk about self-serving. Plus, unless incredibly stupid, he had to have known that the far left, like Maddow, was going to take those controversial comments of his and run with it, which she and other leftists did with alacrity. All the talking heads on PMSNBC pounced on it and Ridge thus did no favors to his Party as a whole. I’m sure his fellow Pubs are just delighted with the pot he stirred. Thanks Ridge, we needed you, your book, and your comments, like a whole in the head.


32 posted on 09/01/2009 10:44:46 PM PDT by flaglady47 (Jim DeMint is looking good to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: All

Cupid Stunt.


33 posted on 09/01/2009 11:21:56 PM PDT by Rodney Dangerfield (Birthers - People who insisted Sarah Palin provide a DNA test to prove Trig is hers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47
I thought it was quite clear that Ridge intended to give the impression that some in the Bush Admin tried to use the security levels for political purposes.

So, he's either a lying piece of garbage because of what he wrote in the book, or he's a lying piece of garbage for what he said in that interview.

34 posted on 09/01/2009 11:42:41 PM PDT by Dianna (Obama Barbie: Governing is hard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo


35 posted on 09/01/2009 11:49:16 PM PDT by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

That’s something to do with mental, or masturbation or... both?


36 posted on 09/02/2009 12:01:37 AM PDT by This_far
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
It's becoming too common on FR these days to post photos without identification. This would be fine if everyone in Freeperville knew the faces of everyone in the world.

For those not acquainted with the cast of characters in the lesbian netherworld, the scraggy middle-aged blonde is Maddow's significant other. I don't know who the euphoric geek is.

Leni

37 posted on 09/02/2009 6:06:24 AM PDT by MinuteGal (We Just Segued from Camelot to Bamalot in One Swell Foop!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Salmonslayer

>>>>>Unless an individuals sexual preferences, race, gender.... are relevant to the discussion, leave it out of your posts.<<<<<<

We got a new moderator here! Did you purchase FRepublic from Jim? How should I post? What should I type next?

I know....

Maddow is a bulldyke butch moonbat!
I will type it again when I see her name again.


38 posted on 09/02/2009 6:25:16 AM PDT by envisio (Foxtrot Yankee Bravo Oscar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen

Damn. What happened to Tom Cruise ?


39 posted on 09/02/2009 7:06:28 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: chris37

There is nothing to get over. I am not compelled to defend Maddow in any way.

If you are posting for those that already agree with than post on. However, if you want to bring in those that are on the fence. I think unnecessary name calling will repel more people than you will attract.

You either elevate your argument beyond irrelevant name calling or argue like a liberal.

You seem to have made your choice.


40 posted on 09/02/2009 11:33:59 AM PDT by Salmonslayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson