Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If Obama's father was a Kenyan then how could Hussein be eligible to be POTUS?
8/26/2009 | Kellynla

Posted on 08/26/2009 12:40:24 PM PDT by kellynla

If Obama's father was a Kenyan then how could Hussein be eligible to be POTUS?


TOPICS: Conspiracy; History; Reference
KEYWORDS: article2section; bc; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; colb; kenyan; obama; obamafamily; potus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 341-344 next last
To: CodeToad; kellynla

Keeping it alive


121 posted on 08/26/2009 3:56:39 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

As it was explained to me at the time, Roberts knew that it was illegal to swear in a man who was ineligible, so he purposefully tried to mangle the oath. Only later did Obama force him into re-administering the oath at the White House.

Oh, please. If he thought it was illegal, he would have said something. He wouldn't have sworn him in twice.

122 posted on 08/26/2009 4:02:48 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kleon; kellynla
Nope.  Traditional Citizenship is defined by your fathers Nationality in all countries.

Further his natural born eligibility is eroded in the definition of allegiance, citizenship and laws that govern you as a citizen of the country from whence you came.

You will find a further definition in the 14th amendment:


All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

Barry's Father was a citizen of Kenya and subject to jurisdiction of said country.  In other words he is entitled to or restricted to any conveyance of laws by the country of Kenya.

Barry acknowledges this and apparently no one cares.  Barry tells you proudly that he was a citizen of Kenya due to his father's citizenship.  It is there in plain view, unabashedly.

Was Barry a citizen of the United States at the time of his birth?  The answer is probably no and you will find others who will add to this post, shortly.

Even if he was born here, which is very much in doubt, he cannot be a "Natural Born Citizen" as his father was a Kenyan, making him a citizen of Kenya.  If one wants to extend to him citizenship because his mother was born here and was citizen at the time of his birth, again the argument that he is "Natural Born" falls apart and he admits as much.  At best he would have a divided citizenship and thus his ability to be President by a clouded birth of citizenship which the Constitution, the Supreme Law of the Land, makes a clear distinction as to who qualifies.

Bottom line is Barry was a citizen of another country at birth and his citizenship at birth is clearly not natural born.

Both Parents are required to citizens of the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.  You will find reasons why they could be disqualified as being under the jurisdiction of the United States to bolster your argument but that might be for another time.


123 posted on 08/26/2009 4:07:34 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: marvlus

Maybe so but, not “Natural Born”


124 posted on 08/26/2009 4:08:06 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

Which Birth Certificate?

He had one to enter the public school system however, the great mystery is why Barry’s and only Barry’s records for Kingergarten are gone. Whut Hahppnd?

What about the Birth Certificate he found among his mother’s belongings upon here death in 1995. Where is that one?

Where is the Birth Certficate he used to gain an American Passport and get into college? Where or Where?


125 posted on 08/26/2009 4:10:40 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Vendome
Bottom line is Barry was a citizen of another country at birth

Maybe according to the laws of a different country. The U.S. Constitution says he is a citizen.

126 posted on 08/26/2009 4:14:42 PM PDT by Kleon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tx_eggman

Ohhh!


127 posted on 08/26/2009 4:33:06 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Kleon

Well, I don’t believe your citizenship is whole if you have dual citizenship. But I am not an attorney I just act like one.


128 posted on 08/26/2009 4:48:40 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: All
Ya know I was thinking....Winston Churchill's mother was a natural born American. of course his father was a Brit.

and Winny was born in....Hawaii...yeah that's the ticket Hawaii....now that means that the British Bulldog was really and American Pit Bull...and believe you me he would have made a better POTUS than socialist FDR and friggin’ day.

Just saying is all.

129 posted on 08/26/2009 4:54:09 PM PDT by Vaquero ("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

So why such a great fear in letting the courts look into this issue?

Don’t give me the “they already have” line.

You know the courts haven’t clearly defined what the founding fathers meant when they used the term “natural born citizen” as the requirement for POTUS. Why is that phrase there at all if everyone is eligible?

It’s clear to many who have researched this issue that there is are serious questions and little by little, the research is striking down your talking points.

There is plenty of documentation outside of the Constitution which discusses the founding fathers meaning. Let the courts decide the issue.
The SCOTUS has reached beyond the Constitution many times in order to define the meaning.


130 posted on 08/26/2009 5:05:09 PM PDT by joedel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: joedel
It’s clear to many who have researched this issue that there is are serious questions and little by little, the research is striking down your talking points.

You'd like to think that, but you'd be wrong.

There is plenty of documentation outside of the Constitution which discusses the founding fathers meaning. Let the courts decide the issue.

And how's that going for you?

131 posted on 08/26/2009 6:08:27 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Vendome; netmilsmom; BP2
Thanks for the posts for we (the Suntrade Institute) do follow the Obama qualification issue, and these are relevant.

Clearly Barack Obama who is considerably younger than I is someone who is not grounded in the philosophy of citizenship that made the United States unparalleled among nations (the great experiment) - that is, that a US citizen has the obligation of self responsibility, in virtually all things, which consequently allows each and every one of us to be free. It is important to expose his destitution in this, from alien parents to hidden credentials of all types.

In a very real way Barack Obama really is a joke, a sad joke on the United States and all that it is has stood for in world history. It is not like the man himself is an odious person anymore than one's teenage son is an odious person or that Brad Pitt can't be President, but rather that those who put him here are a sinister conspiracy of Leftism. Given that, it is certainly proper that any and all aspects of Barack Obama's qualifications, credentials, and background be revealed, discussed, and judged.

The American people have been asleep, or maybe in a coma of demoralization from which they will never revive; and absolutely anything which can arouse them to consciousness, the consciousness of responsibility and freedom, is warranted. For example, maybe Justice Roberts himself is asleep, it is not unheard of among Supreme Court Justices, and for any citizen to think an attorney, basically a paid prostitute to do the talking, has any greater privilege to interpret the laws by which we all live, then that citizen has forfeited his privilege of life, that is, his freedom.

Your posts are valuable in revealing those who in the past have considered the ramifications of a Trojan Horse entering the fortress of human dignity.

Johnny Suntrade

132 posted on 08/26/2009 6:09:02 PM PDT by jnsun (The LEFT: The need to manipulate others because of nothing productive to offer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: jnsun; netmilsmom; BP2
I like your post. What is the Suntrade Institute. Of course, I can google it but I am interested in your view of Suntrade.

Obama is a prostitute of sorts, selling goods and infrastructure that were in place well before his election. He has not an original thought and every last bit of legislation signed by him has been outsourced to the pimps in the Congress and the Senate.

This “Health Insurance” scam didn't arise through Barry O. but is a product that been crafted over the years and it's intent and message tightened up by those who will reap the most benefit.

The authors of this boondogle are the ones who will benefit financially while draining our pockets of hard earned cash and exerting ever more control over out lives.

So back to Barry, we fight all politicians we disagree with on many fronts and his constitutionality is but one of them. We also fight against power excerted but, not enumerated in the Constitution.

We fight against the wordsmiths who wish to mangle direct language and original intent by crafting out of whole cloth a new meaning to the General Welfare clause. The definition of the preamble of the so called “clause” is interpreted and defined by the actual enumerations of power granted while the rest are left to the states and individual.

Some on this board say we shouldn't talk about this but lacking proof by Barry O. of his life history why shouldn't we, who also lack proof ask the question: Who are you Barry O.?

We only know of Barry O. and his thoughts by the fellow travelers he has surrounded himself with, his entire life.

And to that we ask again, Does this Constitution have any value to you, our fellow Americans?

If this Constitution is still valuable and valid to you then isn't it incumbent upon Barry O. to provide a record of who he is?

He has already admitted to dual citizenship and no one has any authority spelled out to challenge that fact as a fowl mark against whole citizenship.

Fight on.

133 posted on 08/26/2009 7:06:06 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

He isn’t eligible! Our Constitution must be enforced.


134 posted on 08/26/2009 7:23:53 PM PDT by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill

Damn, man, post the question BEFORE criticizing a delay in response!

The Founding Fathers knew that “naturalized” citizens had a different citizenship lineage than someone a citizen for life. They bring a less than complete American experience to the office of President - but there is no office which embodies that experience more completely. “Naturalized” and “President” are incompatible.

They also knew that “native” had the same essential problem, as the USA as a culture amounts to occupying and supplanting another nation & people (”native” Americans).

As for “natural born”: that was written at a time when citizenship was not a bureaucratic formality, as there was no bureaucracy, and there was little time to both establish naturalization for both parents and THEN produce offspring as citizens at birth. If born here as a citizen at birth (not naturalized later, or of an occupied culture) then you’re good to go as President and the American totality the office repesents.

But then there are those with Obama Derangement Syndrome who would reject the Obama’s citizenship under any scenario.

Fair disclosure: I think the Obama was born in Kenya.


135 posted on 08/26/2009 7:27:44 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (flag@whitehouse.gov may bounce messages but copies may be kept. Informants are still solicited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Kleon
Because his mother's citizenship

His mother was a leftist whore who was into black muslim marxists from Africa.

Just FYI

136 posted on 08/26/2009 7:27:55 PM PDT by Rome2000 (Hussein Baraka Mook Kebba)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kleon
Established dicta is considered as to one of themore reliable methods of determining original intent. Examine John Jay's 1987 letter to G. Washington wherin he urged him to adopt Vattel's Law of Nation's definition for "natural born citizen" for inclusiom in Article 2, Sec 1, clause 5 of the USC. John Jay wrote: "Permit me to hint, whether it would be wise and reasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Commander in Chief of the American army shall not be given to nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen." Photobucket
137 posted on 08/26/2009 7:31:17 PM PDT by DMZFrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kleon

NO!

A natural born citizen is born in the nation where the parents are BOTH citizens.


138 posted on 08/26/2009 9:00:17 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NO Foreign Nationals as our President!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
But I thought BOTH parents had to be American citizens in order for someone could be eligible to be POTUS

You thought wrong. There's nothing in U.S. law that says that.

139 posted on 08/26/2009 9:02:07 PM PDT by Technical Editor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
NO! A natural born citizen is born in the nation where the parents are BOTH citizens.

You have nothing to support your claim. There is no law in the United States saying that. Whoever keeps singing that tune is out of his mind. Crazy. Insane. No law says that. Crazy people say that without any evidence -- not a single U.S. law states that.

140 posted on 08/26/2009 9:04:33 PM PDT by Technical Editor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 341-344 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson