Posted on 05/07/2009 3:29:52 AM PDT by Oshkalaboomboom
Another site I am on is trying to start a small folding team. One "green" activist is trying to make the case that you would be better off sending money directly to cancer researchers rather than wasting energy by folding. His argument is that projects like folding and SETI have been wasting time and energy for years with nothing to show for it and all you are doing is putting money in the pockets of electric company executives. Are there any studies that show how much it costs to run folding 24/7 as opposed to just letting your pc sit idle 24/7? I can't believe that running your cpu at 100% is going to add significantly to the cost.
BTW, I finally broke the FR top 100 for folding, that was my goal when I started.
the question would be, would your computer be on anyway. If not, then add up the cost of the extra hours, at perhaps 100W to 200W depending on computer, then look at the cost to you.
then find the cost of computing power if the cancer people bought it in bulk, and decide which is cheaper. it could go either way. it’s just that most people are more likely to leave their PC on than to actually give $10 a month to a charity
I confess my ignorance, but other than paper, clothes, bedsheets and napkins, what are you folding and why would electric company executives even take notice?
Now, “greens” want to get their stupid noses into everything we do on the principle that since they are enlightened, they can’t possibly be at fault for any problem and therefore it must be us, but “folding”? This seems like a stretch even for them.
Congrats on your top 100. I’m languishing in the 170s. I wish I could get a second computer folding.
Ask the greenie about carbon credits.
The math should be fairly simple.
((Watts * Hours) / 1000) * electrical rate.
Lets suppose that you’ve got a hot gpu that uses 200 watts to fold. I have a GTX280 at home that draws roughly 200 watts while folding.
200 * 24 = 4800
4800 / 1000 = 4.8 kilowatts a day
4.8 * 11(cents per kwh) = 52.8 cents a day
52.8 * 365.25(day/year) = 19285.2 cents per year
Cost = $192 per year
Now, if you sent $192/year to cancer researchers, how much do you think would actually be spent on cancer research? 100%? Reality shows that while they say “x dollars goes towards research” you have understand that the guy delivering lunch is contributing towards cancer research by that metric. Much of each dollar goes towards administrative, overhead and capital costs. I would bet that actual money spent towards research falls somewhere down at about 25% of donated money.
Do you think that $50/year spent towards cancer research will ever provide meaningful results.
100% of what your donating via folding is actual cancer research, not going towards takeaway Chinese and administrative bonuses.
In my case, at one point, I had 50+ machines folding so the benefit was even greater! :)
Ping.
Home cancer research in your computer’s downtime:
I finally have a decent computer so will get this going.
How cold is it where you are? The heat generated by the system goes to warm your house, so if you need the heat anyways it is a wash.
The last time I measured power usage was back when I had 3 machines running the folding software. I kept them on 24 hours a day; when idle they drew about 286 watts, and used 373 watts when running folding. At my current electric rates, that works out to about $8.61 a month to run folding.
I’m down to one machine now, though — 47 watts idle, 60 watts when folding. Estimated monthly cost for folding: about $1.29.
While SETI did not discover firm proof of intelligent life in the universe (including way too often on our own planet) it pioneered the entire discipline of distributed computing. Without the efforts of the SETI group, there would not have been a Genome@home project to help create the equipment to decode genes by the thousands as they do now. It has to start somewhere.
Malsua is correct, most of these systems will be left on anyway, or are doing such simple tasks that we can easily slip in processing to fold proteins. The power consumed is a trickle compared to the results.
http://folding.stanford.edu/English/Papers
In the case of Folding@home, Stanford University has released 63 peer reviewed papers to date, more than any other DC project in the world.
http://folding.stanford.edu/English/FAQ-Diseases
With all due respect, if it wasn't for projects like Folding@home I could never meaningfully participate in this scientific research. I don't have the math background, the medical background or the time to do more than an occational fundraiser. F@H allows me to contribute 24/7 to finding cures that will one day benefit ME personally, and my family.
http://folding.stanford.edu/English/Science
The sheer scale of protein folding is difficult to comprehend. Some proteins can fold a million times per second, but it takes a modern supercomputer a day to simulate one-billionth of a second of folding. There simply isn't enough computing power outside of distributed computing to achieve any detailed results in the field.
And what is wrong with allowing utilities, many of which are owned by the public, from selling electricity? The shareholders certainly care about power sales, and in most parts of the country folding power usage doesn't even effect the grid during the peak usage at 3 - 5 pm.
Now, if the greenie wants to prove how green he is by living totally off grid, then we can have a different discussion. Have fun taunting the little green fool.
It also depends on whether or not you let your monitor go to sleep when you’re not using your computer - in my experience, the majority of power (determined by battery life in different situations) my computer uses while idle or even just running something that takes half the night goes to the screen. If the monitor/screen is ‘asleep’, which is possible because it’s not necessary for *you* to see it while your computer is folding, then it probably is more cost-effective.
Plus, you’ve got to consider that the donations would go to publicity, overhead, salaries (even in a nonprofit, in order for people to be full-time they do need a salary), and so on in addition to the research, whereas when you’re folding you’re contributing 100% to the research.
Thank you. I'm 93 now and at a point where I move up 1 place per month if I'm lucky. But not long ago I was also in the 170's all it take is persistence and patience.
This is the first copy of our team scores from 2005. Nearly all of the systems were my personal systems or systems that friends let me maintain (and borg).
This snapshot shows 31 contributors on Dec 9, of which 20 were my systems. Passing a dozen people a week was common. And then when Klutz joined in earnest, the folks at DU howled in protest.
FWIW, SazanEyes produces more points every two days with his folding farm than the entire team did in over a year. How times have changed!
My electric bill has gone up about $60-100 per month since I started folding. It’s hard to get exact numbers because I also added a couple computers. I always left my PCs on 24/7 anyway, so this is just the extra cost of running them at 100% load. My bill will go up this summer (rate increases from 7.77 to 8.92 cents/kWh), whereas my computers helped heat my condo in the winter (seriously).
My primary folding box, with four 9800GX2 graphics cards and a quad-core AMD proc, pulls about 1000W from the wall at 100% load. This accounts for most of my extra electrical cost - using the formula above, about $56 to $64/month depending on the electric rate. The average computer doesn’t use anywhere near that much power.
From an environmental/conservation standpoint, I think it’s more valuable to have my computers doing something useful rather than sitting idle (wasting electricity) while waiting for me to access them. Distributed computing is also a good way to raise the profile of various research projects among computer users. Plus, man-caused global warming and “peak oil” are hoaxes, so I’ll use as much electricity as I want. ;-)
BTW, I’m currently participating in an annual folding contest with another team, but I’ll be back on team 36120 in a few days.
Are you seeing any slowdown in awarding points on GPU work units? With two GPUs I expected to be producing more than I am.
I installed an ATI 4850 and have seen a decent pop in points.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.