Posted on 04/05/2009 10:47:41 PM PDT by gondramB
Summary
This visually explosive FBI document reveals the secret symbols organized pedophiles use to recognize each other and is likely to be of broad interest to readers, especially parents. Wikileaks has verified the document.
Freepmail wagglebee or DirtyHarryY2K to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
Put, now you are talking about an organization SPECIFICALLY FOR the homosexual pedophiles in our world. And ones who are PROUD of it at that... That doesn’t answer my question AT ALL!!!
Whatever... Your statements stand for themselves, as do mine.
CORRECTION: Put should read, “But”
“Put, now you are talking about an organization SPECIFICALLY FOR the homosexual pedophiles in our world. And ones who are PROUD of it at that... That doesn’t answer my question AT ALL!!!”
I’m pointing out the level of acceptance and the lack of barriers among the homosexual groups, until they started getting more politically savvy, homosexuals were very open about their youth fascination and NAMBLA was a part of their unified front of organizations, raw numbers of sex partners was another part of the homosexual lifestyle also until cooler heads in the media convinced them to start playing that down and pretend to be monogamy lovers.
Pedophiles and homosexuals move among each other pretty freely as evidenced by the level of acceptance of NAMBLA among gays and the media.
What about serial killers, anything going on there as far as being over represented among homosexuals?
Pedophiles are those attracted to children below puberty. Those attracted to adolescents are - heck, I can’t remember the exact name - eubophiles?
Freepmail wagglebee or DirtyHarryY2K to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
Thanks for the ping.
You're right - if Walmart knew they would dump that stuff in a New York minute. If you've seen it at Walmart, tell them.
1. Homosexuals account for only 1-2% of our population based on current surveys. The National Opinion Research Center in 1992 found that 2.8% of men and 1.4% of women identified themselves as “homosexual” or “bisexual. A 1995 survey of 18-49-year-old men published by the Journal of Sex Research indicated that 2.6% of them had engaged in homosexual sex within the prior 12 months; 4% had homosexual sex within the past five years. In other words, at least 98-99% of our population is heterosexual in orientation.
Homosexual activists routinely claim that most child molesters are “heterosexual” males, thus shifting the focus away from their own very high rates of molestation. Since 98-99% of the population is heterosexual, it is technically correct to say that most molestations are done by heterosexuals. However, statistics indicate that homosexuals pose a far more serious threat to children than do heterosexuals.
For example: In 1987, Dr. Stephen Rubin of Whitman College conducted a ten-state study of sex abuse cases involving school teachers. He studied 199 cases. Of those, 122 male teachers had molested girls, while 14 female teachers had molested boys. He also discovered that 59 homosexual male teachers had molested boys and four female homosexual teachers had molested girls. In other words, 32 percent of those child molestation cases involved homosexuals. Nearly a third of these cases come from only 1-2% of the population.
Dr. Judith Reisman, in her book, Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences, describes the research done by Dr. Gene Abel. This researcher compared the molestation rates of self-confessed homosexual and heterosexual child molesters. In a sample of 153 homosexual molesters, they confessed to a total of 22,981 molestations. This is equivalent to 150 children per molester. Self-admitted heterosexual molesters admitted to 4,435 molestations. This comes to 19.8 victims per molester. Dr. Abel concluded that homosexuals “sexually molest young boys at an incidence that is occurring from five times greater than the molestation of girls.”
This high rate of molestations by homosexuals is consistent with other studies conducted during the past several decades. Here are just a few studies that show homosexuals molesting children at epidemic rates:
The Los Angeles Times conducted a survey in 1985 of 2,628 adults across the U.S. Of those, 27% of the women and 16% of the men had been sexually molested. Seven percent of the girls and 93% of the men had been molested by adults of the same sex. This means that 40% of child molestations were by homosexuals. (Los Angeles Times, August 25-6, 1985)
In 1984, a Vermont survey of 161 adolescents who were sex offenders found that 35 of them were homosexuals (22%). (Wasserman, J., “Adolescent Sex Offenders—Vermont, 1984” Journal American Medical Association, 1986; 255:181-2)
In 1991, of the 100 child molesters at the Massachusetts Treatment Center for Sexually Dangerous Persons, a third were heterosexual, a third were bisexual, and a third were homosexual. (Dr. Raymond Knight, “Differential Prevalence of Personality Disorders in Rapists and Child Molesters,” Eastern Psychological Association Conference, New York, April 12, 1991)
Drs. Freund and Heasman of the Clark Institute of Psychiatry in Toronto reviewed two studies on child molesters and calculated that 34% and 32% of the sex offenders were homosexual. In cases these doctors had handled, 36% of the molesters were homosexuals. (Freund, K. “Pedophilia and Heterosexuality vs. Homosexuality,” Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 1984; 10:193-200)
From these studies and many more, it is evident that homosexuals molest children at a far greater rate than do their heterosexual counterparts. While they comprise only 1-2% of the population, they are responsible for upwards of a third or more of all sexual molestations of children.
So, while homosexual=child molestor may not be exactly true, those repsonsible for the safety of children MUST assume that any person involved in homosexuality is a child molestor.
Would you let your child drive with a person who has a proven 50% risk of a fatal accident? Then why would you let your child be around someone who is at least as likely to be a molestor.
And then there's always the third law of homosexuality:
Any exposure of children to homosexual behavior is child abuse
A quick scan of the San Fran Bay Area reveals about 10% of the population wears these as lapel pins.
If you are really interested in busting pedophiles I suggest you do not keep spreading false information like saying all pedophiles are gay people...””
Nobody is saying all, but pedophilia is a part of the male homosexual lifestyle and has been since ancient Rome. I lived in the San Fran area for 6 years in the late 60s and it was very prevalent, even at that time. It is the part of the lifestyle that yet is hidden in their closets. They will deny it because it is still illegal, but the times are changing with allowing them access to kids in school and even through adoption.
Homosexuals=pedophiles””
Correction: male homosexuals = pedophiles. The incidence of female homosexual pedophilia is more like the incidence in the heterosexual population. Libertyrocks doesn’t understand what the term incidence means.
Loudly ask them if they know what it symbolizes. After they tell you they don't know, loudly tell them. Anyone who's innocent will appreciate the warning & perps will know that people are on to them, making it more difficult to connect with others, the purpose of the symbols.
Very true. The reality is that most gays are not pedophiles and have no interest in harming anyone. Now, I must admit that there are a lot of 50+ gays who are turned on by 20-somethings, but that’s not so unusual in the heterosexual world either . Just think of all the older men who go after the playboy kind of woman. Men, straight or gay, often think with the wrong head.
BTW, sorry to hear about the sexual abuse in your past.Hope the perp got punished severly.
Thank you so much for taking the time to answer my questions, and to provide the statistics! That is VERY distressing information...
I have some other questions now, and actually a theory that I’ve had for a while in relation to homosexuality that actually seems way more plausible in light of one of the studies you mentioned.
However, I’m fighting the flu, or bronchitis, or SOMETHING right now, and my medication is making me feel a little “loopy”. So, I’ll hold off on getting into this topic again for now until I can process info. a little easier! LOL
Thanks again for providing the information. I really appreciate it. I’m always grateful to learn new things, especially if it can correct something I’m mistaken about, or alert me to a possible misconception I hold — and especially when it’s about a topic as important as this!
ROFL... You folks crack me up, really. You make outrageous bigoted statements that could NEVER be proven, and then try to pretend that I’m the one who is too ignorant to understand?
Do you know what an equation is? Did you ever take algebra? Do you know what an “all-inclusive” statement is? Do you know what “bigoted” mean? Do you know what “stereotype” means? Do you know the difference between an INCIDENT or INCIDENTS, and a RATE of INCIDENCE?
Besides, Vaduz didn’t mention anything about INCIDENTS, or RATE of INCIDENCE. The post I originally replied literally meant: ALL Homosexuals are Pedophiles, and ALL Pedophiles are Homosexuals. Even YOU recognized this as a falsehood as witnessed by YOUR response. You did a LITTLE better, but still made an all-inclusive statement regarding male homosexuals (which by your explanation it would seem you didn’t REALLY mean to imply..).
People have to learn to say what they mean and be CLEAR about it when trying to educate people on these issues. No-one benefits when people make bigoted, stereotypical, all-inclusive declarations like you and Vaduz have done here, that can be so easily tossed aside by opponents, or others who just truly don’t know. People who make all-inclusive statements are cutting off their noses to spite their face...
Thanks again. I’ll definitely read over that later. :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.