Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Guns in Movies
Internet Movie Firearm Database ^ | 3-24-09 | imfdb.org

Posted on 03/24/2009 7:17:49 AM PDT by BronzePencil

Fun website that describes firearms used in movies, tv, etc.

For example, this is from the Saving Private Ryan page:

Perhaps the most commonly seen weapon in the movie, the M1 Garand is used by the majority of the U.S. soldiers seen in the film. The M1 Garand is easily identified by the characteristic ping it makes ejecting its clip after the last round in the en bloc clip is fired. Based on the way everyone can hold these weapons easily, they seem to be light weight models for easy handling in the film, which cuts the realism down a bit.

(Excerpt) Read more at imfdb.org ...


TOPICS: Hobbies; Miscellaneous; Reference; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: gun; movie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: rellimpank

“-—and of course, the “ping” is of little or no consequence noise-wise when you have just fired 8 rounds of ‘06’s-—”

Or 4 rds of 8mm Mauser :-).


41 posted on 03/24/2009 9:09:48 AM PDT by PeteB570 (NRA - Life member and Black Rifle owner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk

“...and it was the fictional story of modern day soldiers supplying the Confederacy with AK 47’s and how they had to change the training of using the weapons of that period..”

Truth is stranger than fiction. With the developement of the minnie ball, Rifle/Muskets and multi shot carbines the tactics changed greatly from 1861 to 1865.


42 posted on 03/24/2009 9:14:23 AM PDT by PeteB570 (NRA - Life member and Black Rifle owner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky
Hmmmmm...I remember we used to drill with M1 Garands in boot camp.

Yeah, and that "This is my rifle, this is my gun" song could go on for a long time. Especially if it was the THIRD time.

43 posted on 03/24/2009 9:20:01 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk
Ironically the more sought after rifle nowadays is the modernized M-14 platform which could be called the son of the Garand, it uses a shorter .308 cartridge with near identical capabilities.

The M-14 is a fine weapon and is the "son of the Garand," However for prone shooting the magazine on the bottom makes it less user friendly than the inblock clip of the Garand.

Note: In WWII a US infantry man shooting the Garand could lay down twice the rounds a Brit could with his 303 Enfield or the Germans with their Mauser. Both of which are bolt actions.

PS
If you go to Springfield, Mass and visit the Springfield Armory museum you can see the prototypes and the first production one off the line and the subsequent rifles number 1 million 2 million 3 million etc.

John C Garand, Moses Browning, and Stoner were all geniuses in the design of rifles and machine guns. Kalashnikov also but his AK was a modification of a German Design but do not sell him short. He improved it vastly and made it into a potent weapon.

44 posted on 03/24/2009 9:22:20 AM PDT by cpdiii (roughneck, oilfield trash and proud of it, geologist, pilot, pharmacist, iconoclast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: xone
The sight is one of the finest sights ever mounted on a mass scale, and a great contributor to the rifle's overall effectiveness in getting a .30 cal projo where it needed to get.

Without any doubt they are the best production open military sight every made. User friendly, accurate, and you can adjust them by clicks and do not even need to look at the sight to do this. Count the click and you know what range it is sighted for. As I said, John C Garand was a genius!

45 posted on 03/24/2009 9:26:11 AM PDT by cpdiii (roughneck, oilfield trash and proud of it, geologist, pilot, pharmacist, iconoclast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Huck

“What’s the point?”

The point is that we see a little tiny bit of what our soldiers go through so we can be able to safely sit on our couches and watch movies and talk on the internet about how graphic they are. It gave me a deeper appreciation of the people who do go to war for us, and deal with all that so I don’t have to, although to be honest the only part of that movie that bothered me at all was the shot of the bloody ocean water washing up on the shore at Normandy, and that was beyond even what I’m used to seeing in terms of death and gore and such.


46 posted on 03/24/2009 9:38:03 AM PDT by Hyzenthlay (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii
"John C Garand, Moses Browning, and Stoner were all geniuses in the design of rifles and machine guns. Kalashnikov also but his AK was a modification of a German Design but do not sell him short."

If you're going to list those names, you ought to toss in David "Carbine" Williams...

47 posted on 03/24/2009 9:44:35 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: NMEwithin
I agree, they had some good technical advice on that movie. Everything about that shoot out is realistic even down to the combat techniques used. Good stuff

Michael Mann is notoriously obsessive about every detail. He's also notorious for driving his crews crazy. An editor once told me that a curse in Hollywood is "May you work for Michael Mann."

48 posted on 03/24/2009 9:47:58 AM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: BronzePencil

I have held and fired a M1, it is a long rifle, but it is not too bad to use... makes a nice ragged hole in targets too.


49 posted on 03/24/2009 9:51:36 AM PDT by MD_Willington_1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk

The Turtledove books are great.

For a greater sense of realism, “The Forever War” served as a fantastic counterpoint to “Starship Troopers”.

The “glory” of warfare is completely eliminated and both the reliance upon technology and the immediate dangers of technology are showcased quite well.


50 posted on 03/24/2009 9:55:34 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Huck
I honestly wish I hadn’t seen it.

I on the other hand watch it once or twice a year to remind me of the bravery and sacrifices that our military has made to give us the freedom and liberty that we once had. Those in my age group (50s and 60s) can remember the freedom to say what you wanted without fear, for kids to play outside and after dark without fear, to view a policeman without fear and the list goes on and on. WE as a nation have allowed petty little dictators to progressively take away our freedoms one small step at a time and I do not know if we have the will to take them back. I hear a lot of talk but I see no actions.

51 posted on 03/24/2009 10:05:13 AM PDT by fella (.He that followeth after vain persons shall have poverty enough." Pv.28:19')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: cc2k
Last night, they had a major mistake on "24". Jack Bauer screws a silencer onto a tactical rifle that looked like some sort of 5.56mm tactical rifle. He then shoots a bad guy from a fair distance (more than 50 yards), and the sound effect is that of a silenced round being fired. Not likely that he had a subsonic load in that rifle. Not likely to hit someone with a subsonic round at that distance, and even hitting them with a "slow" round at that distance isn't that likely to drop them to the ground instantly.

I don't watch TV, but it could have been some thing like a .50 beowolf, or 6.8. Not all AR looking rifles are .223. They do make some really good silences for assault rifles.

And yes, you can drop something at over 50 yards with a subsonic if you have something like 458 Socom. Or anything if the shot is well placed.
52 posted on 03/24/2009 10:43:43 AM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE

Ah, yes. “The Forever War” by Joe Haldeman. What a great story.

I’m sure the homos don’t like it too much.


53 posted on 03/24/2009 10:51:11 AM PDT by Levante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk

Yeah that is a pretty sweet setup. I am considering their XDM 9mm pistol.


54 posted on 03/24/2009 11:12:50 AM PDT by Frantzie (Boycott GE - they own NBC, MSNBC, CNBC & Universal. Boycott Disney - they own ABC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep

LOL! The shootout in Heat was pretty incredible and realistic.


55 posted on 03/24/2009 11:18:00 AM PDT by Frantzie (Boycott GE - they own NBC, MSNBC, CNBC & Universal. Boycott Disney - they own ABC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570
With the developement of the minnie ball, Rifle/Muskets and multi shot carbines the tactics changed greatly from 1861 to 1865.

True dat. One thing it taught the smart generals was not to make a frontal infantry assault on a fortified position. Aimed fire could reach out and touch the individual soldier. Pity everybody forgot about that until it had to be relearned the hard way a half-century later. And that time they had Maxims.

56 posted on 03/24/2009 11:34:37 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson