Skip to comments.
American Concept cars
Viacomit ^
| 10/21
| Hugh N. Owen
Posted on 01/27/2009 1:13:32 PM PST by P.O.E.
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last


(More at website)
FYI - some of the sidelinks are rated PG-MA
1
posted on
01/27/2009 1:13:32 PM PST
by
P.O.E.
To: P.O.E.
I think the American car makers could go for quality... that would be a new concept to them.
2
posted on
01/27/2009 1:16:51 PM PST
by
brownsfan
(We are sooooo screwed.)
To: P.O.E.
Somewhere or other the future got hijacked.
3
posted on
01/27/2009 1:17:26 PM PST
by
DManA
To: P.O.E.
Hmmm, they had video of the Mako Shark, but no pics of any kind of the original Stingray show car. What a shame. No pics of the Aerovette either. :(
To: P.O.E.

Chrysler Atlantic....
5
posted on
01/27/2009 1:21:03 PM PST
by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll)
To: DManA
Finishing your sentence “. . . . by the UAW with assistance of corrupt politicians.”
6
posted on
01/27/2009 1:21:33 PM PST
by
MeanWestTexan
(Beware Obama's Reichstag fire.)
To: DManA
"Somewhere or other the future got hijacked." The future isn't what it used to be.
7
posted on
01/27/2009 1:22:24 PM PST
by
who_would_fardels_bear
(The cosmos is about the smallest hole a man can stick his head in. - Chesterton)
To: P.O.E.
That top car is pretty!
Modern cars are classless, sexless, lifeless, but very fuel efficient.
8
posted on
01/27/2009 1:28:37 PM PST
by
Red6
To: MeanWestTexan
. . . . by the UAW with assistance of corrupt politicians.
Right. Good thing the executives had nothing to do with the wrong direction of the companies.
9
posted on
01/27/2009 1:29:30 PM PST
by
gracesdad
To: who_would_fardels_bear
I have seen a glimpse of the future and it’s not pretty.
Born in 1933...
10
posted on
01/27/2009 1:29:53 PM PST
by
tubebender
(Your Tag Line offends me...)
To: who_would_fardels_bear
..back to the future,
..circa 1955, multi-tensioned crumple zones, ABS inboard front wheel disc brakes, protected gas tank, side impact protection.
To go further describing safety innovations would make it to easy, what is it?
11
posted on
01/27/2009 1:31:43 PM PST
by
norraad
("What light!">Blues Brothers)
To: norraad
12
posted on
01/27/2009 1:35:22 PM PST
by
Phantom Lord
(Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
To: P.O.E.

Ford Nucleon, ca. 1958, powered by a small nuclear reactor in the rear of the vehicle (theoretically).
To: martin_fierro
What happened to the future? It was once a place where everything was cool like the Jetsons. Now the future is seen as an evil place with global warming, wars, starvation and awful stuff. We need to re-capture the future. The only positive vision of the future is found in Star-Trek.
To: Phantom Lord
Edsel's brakes didn't have a hydraulic computer automatically redistributing stopping power to each corner of the car by determining G force with a simple trolly/lever system under the brake button.
Yes, button, the throttle was a small metal rod so that to get on the brake you just pivot your foot instead of lifting you leg and moving it over to the brake pedal (oh, mon diux, how crude).
You see, at speed, pivoting the foot is faster, could be the dif. btw. crashing and not crashing.
The folks who built this comfy car on a dirt floor factory had made the rash decision that not crashing was better.
15
posted on
01/27/2009 1:43:06 PM PST
by
norraad
("What light!">Blues Brothers)
To: Forward the Light Brigade
What happened to the future? It was once a place where everything was cool like the Jetsons. Now the future is seen as an evil place with global warming, wars, starvation and awful stuff. We need to re-capture the future. The only positive vision of the future is found in Star-Trek. It's OK, I'm authorized to tell you that you will successfully make it through these trying times. There will be pain and destruction, but much stupidity will also perish, freeing mankind for the glorious future that is our destiny.
I am also authorized to tell you to quit electing Democrats.
They aren't human.
To: Starfleet Command
"Democrats. . . They aren't human."
Hmmmm.
Democrats lack physical courage, so they're not Klingons.
Not smart enough to be Vulcans, or even Romulans.
Money grubbing, cowardly, with women issues . . . .
Ahaha! Democrats are Ferengi!
Explains Obama's ears, his missing birth certificate, everything!
17
posted on
01/27/2009 2:06:03 PM PST
by
MeanWestTexan
(Beware Obama's Reichstag fire.)
To: MeanWestTexan
Only problem is they suck at business...
The only have one rule of acquisition, take everything from the successful and spread it to the non hackers in society...
18
posted on
01/27/2009 2:12:42 PM PST
by
ejonesie22
(Stupidity has an expiration date 1-20-2013 *(Thanks Nana))
To: MeanWestTexan
Ahaha! Democrats are Ferengi! Flawless analysis. Kudos!
Now we need to have an orbiting ship scan for Ferengi bio-signs, lock phasers, and do the right thing...
To: ejonesie22
"Only problem is they suck at business" True. Perhaps a Bolian, as they are generally soft types, avoid conflict, are "into" assisted suicide and generally work as hair dressers and waiters:
20
posted on
01/27/2009 2:23:06 PM PST
by
MeanWestTexan
(Beware Obama's Reichstag fire.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson