Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

second hand childrens clothes illegal?
the simple dolloar ^ | 01/04/09 | megben

Posted on 01/04/2009 6:02:37 AM PST by Megben

Trent Hamm at thesimpledollar.com writes in his January 3 entry (excerpted) : "For those of you who haven’t heard the news yet, on February 10, 2009, the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act comes into effect. One of the major changes that this program will bring into play is a mandate that everything sold for children 12 and younger will have to be tested for lead and phthalates, and anything that isn’t tested (or that fails) will be considered hazardous and cannot be sold. Read more about the CPSIA at the L.A. Times and some interesting blog commentary from the fashion industry. Where things get interesting is with used products. Consider your local resale and thrift shop. Currently, all of their secondhand children’s clothes will have to be tested for lead and phthalates. Given that many such stores aren’t high-income operations - many are nonprofits - these shops simply cannot afford to do the testing on the children’s clothes on their shelves.

So what happens? Most thrift shops are currently not accepting any children’s clothing at all. Sometime in the next month or so, all thrift shops will have to clear all of their children’s clothing from the shelves … and send them to the landfill. (It’s worth noting that the Consumer Product Safety Commission is considering a reprieve for products made from natural materials, which would exempt some clothes, but not nearly all clothes"

From reading the whole article, it appears that this will apply to used/new products that are sold at garage sales, thrift stores, ebay, etc. The discussion that follows the blog posts lists going to the sites of the National Bankruptcy Day or the Handmade Toy Alliance Site to write your congressman/woman.

(Excerpt) Read more at thesimpledollar.com ...


TOPICS: Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: clothing; cpsc; cpsi; crafts; crushthenannystate; government; kids; lead; nannystate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 221-235 next last
To: Gabz

Well, the end goal of Socialism IS to have us living like animals in farm-like settings, naked, dirty, slaving away for ‘the good of all’ and dependent upon Mother Government for our daily slop.

This stuff drives me absolutely INSANE! Grrrrrr!


101 posted on 01/04/2009 7:40:05 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin ('Taking the moderate path of appeasement leads to abysmal defeat.' - Rush on 11/05/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: bert

>>>>I drilled mine out to receive a better shower. Many other FReepers have done the same.<<<<<<

Oh sure. Of course. I pulled the plastic restrictors from mine.


102 posted on 01/04/2009 7:40:08 AM PST by angkor ("All you could hope for ...in the world's most august deliberative body." - Baldwin on Franken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Thumper1960

There is a pdf file at this site that explains this new “law”

http://www.cpsc.gov/ABOUT/Cpsia/cpsia.html


103 posted on 01/04/2009 7:40:49 AM PST by antisocial (Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Battle Axe

“Now I think the family carried cystic fibrosis. There is no confirmation of this. It is personal observation and the scant information of how the children died. Both were boys and were the only boys.”

My mother was the youngest of 14 children (9 boys 5 girls), born in 1930. None of the boys lived beyond their first year of life. My mother remembered that the doctor told my grand mother that she’d “never raise a boy”. My sister, a nurse, had asked fellow health professionals what may have been the cause and why it affected only boys. She was never able to come up with any reasonable conclusion.


104 posted on 01/04/2009 7:42:09 AM PST by OldBlondBabe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Nothing wrong with living in farm-like settings.

Why don’t we declare a ban on all Chinese imports Every single thing, for at least 10 years. Tell them to get their act together and MAYBE we will allow trade with them again in the future. I mean really! They’ve permeated everything with products that are deadly toxic, from toys to dog food, clothes, milk, Enough! There no excuse for it in this day and age.


105 posted on 01/04/2009 7:46:11 AM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: libertarian27

“Don’t you just love it when laws like this sneak up on you? Everyone freaked about lead in toys from China...Wanted the Government to do something...Boom~There it is...”

Thank you! You’re one of the few that ‘gets it!’


106 posted on 01/04/2009 7:46:28 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin ('Taking the moderate path of appeasement leads to abysmal defeat.' - Rush on 11/05/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Megben

http://www.cpsc.gov/library/foia/advisory/320.pdf

Read the letter at the above link and you will be relieved to know that the ban only applies to clothing manufactured after the effective date.


107 posted on 01/04/2009 7:47:44 AM PST by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: csmusaret

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2007-1185

Looks like nearly everyone.


108 posted on 01/04/2009 7:48:18 AM PST by OldBlondBabe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: angkor; Gabz

“Americans have accepted federally mandated low-flow showerheads and 1.6 gallon toilet tanks.”

Mandatory Recycling Programs
Mandatory CF light bulbs for rental property owners
Seatbelt laws
Helmet laws
Speed limits on highways
Registering our guns
Micro-chipping our livestock

I could go on, but you know where this is going...


109 posted on 01/04/2009 7:49:49 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin ('Taking the moderate path of appeasement leads to abysmal defeat.' - Rush on 11/05/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

I buy almost everything I wear at thrift stores, but a law regarding items for under-12s won’t affect me.


110 posted on 01/04/2009 7:50:34 AM PST by Tax-chick (Buy Girl Scout cookies! Send them to the troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Megben

I think I’ve only bought one boys’ coat secondhand. People usually give us coats, if we don’t have one to pass down.


111 posted on 01/04/2009 7:51:57 AM PST by Tax-chick (Buy Girl Scout cookies! Send them to the troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: DYngbld

My granddaughter was voted best dressed at her middle school last year and it was because she has tons of clothes, most bought at yard sales and thrift shops.


112 posted on 01/04/2009 7:54:29 AM PST by tiki (True Christians will not deliberately slander or misrepresent others or their beliefs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog

“Nothing wrong with living in farm-like settings.”

Especially for me; I’m the Farmer. :)


113 posted on 01/04/2009 7:54:51 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin ('Taking the moderate path of appeasement leads to abysmal defeat.' - Rush on 11/05/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: OldBlondBabe

Thanks. Looks like the only thing left is to hound Congresscritters until they change this part of the law. Pelosi: 202-225-4965 Reid: 202-224-3542, McConnell: 202-224-3542, Boehner: 202-225-4000.


114 posted on 01/04/2009 8:03:06 AM PST by csmusaret (Congress hasn't got anything right since they declared war on Japan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: csmusaret
Read what the US Consumer Council's attorney has to say.

Looks like the only thing left is to hound Congresscritters

Don't bother. Somebody didn't do the research before they hit the alarm button. The ban only applies to clothing manufactured after the effective date.

115 posted on 01/04/2009 8:09:35 AM PST by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe
Bad law not only doesn't help, it does damage.

This is not law, it is regulation by bureaucrats.
116 posted on 01/04/2009 8:09:49 AM PST by PeterPrinciple ( Seeking the truth here folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich

I haven’t read all 60+ pages of this legislation, but so far I’ve seen only where it speaks to the restriction of lead and phthalates. Where do these two chemicals come into play with fabric or fibers used in clothing?


117 posted on 01/04/2009 8:16:38 AM PST by OldBlondBabe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich

Thanks. We need to call Reid and McConnel anyway about not seating Stewart Smalley. Or tell them to take the next 365 days off.


118 posted on 01/04/2009 8:16:54 AM PST by csmusaret (Congress hasn't got anything right since they declared war on Japan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: cowtowney

If the states get money for enforcement, NEW YORK will be on it like stink on youknowwhat! I like the paper plate idea for garage sales!


119 posted on 01/04/2009 8:27:04 AM PST by RebelTXRose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple
I'm not sure if you have another point (bureaucracy run amok?), but this is, in fact, a law.

From Wikipedia (as unreliable source as that may be): “The Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 is a US law signed on August 14, 2008 by President George W. Bush. The legislative bill was known as HR 4040, sponsored by Congressman Bobby Rush”

Bobby Rush...of the “you better not hang or Lynch Blago’s latest appointment [because he's black]” side of the Chicago-thug-politics fence.

120 posted on 01/04/2009 8:29:18 AM PST by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Abortion has become little more than the New Left's execution of political prisoners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 221-235 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson