Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Obama birth certificate

Posted on 12/15/2008 4:41:09 PM PST by Coachm

Would like to hear some thoughts on why Rush, Sean and Mark Levin don't talk about this issue. It has obvious merit from the point that Obama has fought to keep it secret.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: bc; birthcertificate; certifigate; dec; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

1 posted on 12/15/2008 4:41:09 PM PST by Coachm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Coachm

FEAR !!!


2 posted on 12/15/2008 4:42:46 PM PST by Ouderkirk (Democrats: the party of Slavery, Segregation, Sodomy and Sedition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

Fear of what?


3 posted on 12/15/2008 4:45:24 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Coachm
They can't comment. If they do they are immediately marginalized by the entire media world as “Birthers”
They know the sharks are waiting. Everything they say after that will be held in contempt and mocked by the media establishment.

So, they wait until it breaks and then they can talk about it. Didn't you wonder why it took the National Enquirer to break the Edwards story?

This has got to be an effort by the blogosphere and the few who can take it to the courts. Sooner or later, like the Illinois Governor, something will slip out. Until then, it may stink like week old moldy fish, but we have to put up with it.

4 posted on 12/15/2008 4:45:42 PM PST by IrishCatholic (No local communist or socialist party chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coachm

No one who can do anything seems to care.


5 posted on 12/15/2008 4:48:12 PM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (THE SECOND AMENDMENT, A MATTER OF FACT, NOT A MATTER OF OPINION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coachm
Would like to hear some thoughts on why Rush, Sean and Mark Levin don't talk about this issue.

Because it would destroy their credibility. The election is over. The time to raise any issue is during the campaign. To try to make something out of this now is counter productive. It smacks of Al Gore and his "Selected Not Elected" crowd. Conservatives do not wish to be perceived as sore losers.

6 posted on 12/15/2008 4:49:37 PM PST by Zevonismymuse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishCatholic

since when has Rush been afraid of being margninalized?


7 posted on 12/15/2008 4:50:35 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (appeasement is collaboration.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: IrishCatholic

You are so RIGHT!

It is up to the Blogosphere in the long run.

My question is - Where’s the National Enquirer?
Seriously.


8 posted on 12/15/2008 4:51:03 PM PST by libertarian27 (Land of the Fee, Home of the Shamed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Coachm

Yeap, fear of being called conspiracy kooks, or racist for demanding a black man prove he was born in the US. Truth is, the real kooks are those who don’t think Obama should do the simple thing, and make his birth certificate available for verification. He is hiding something, and contrary to the lame excuse of his staff, this isn’t a privacy issue. People who believe something posted on the Internet that may or may not be real, and tells us nothing either way, are as bad as people who believe in Bigfoot because of a picture in a trash magazine. It’s stupidity. A mental disease too many Americans have these days.


9 posted on 12/15/2008 4:52:02 PM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zevonismymuse
“Because it would destroy their credibility. “
>>>>>>.............
LOL, with whom would it do that pray tell?

IF you claim MSM well they have no creds with those liberal scum to start with..so whom?

10 posted on 12/15/2008 4:52:49 PM PST by shadowgovernment (From the Ashes of a Republican rout will raise a Conservative Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: IrishCatholic

This makes for interesting reading:

Judicial review is allowed only after the Electoral College vote and Congressional Certification.

The Justices denied the “stay’ but have retained the “certori.” It isn’t dead. They’re waiting for the Electoral College to actually elect him. Obama is not President Elect until after the Electoral College “elects” him. Then Congress must approve the Election. Only one senator AND only one representative are needed to stop Obama’s election approval.

Mechanisms exist under the Twelfth Amendment and 3 U.S.C. 15 for any challenge to any candidate to be ventilated when electoral votes are counted, and the Twentieth Amendment provides guidance regarding how to proceed if a president elect shall have failed to qualify.

Issues regarding qualifications or lack thereof can be laid before the voting public before the election and, once the election is over, can be raised as objections as the electoral votes are counted in Congress.

Therefore, this order holds that the challenge presented by plaintiff is committed under the Constitution to the electors and the legislative branch, at least in the first instance. Judicial review, if any, should occur only after the electoral and Congressional processes have run their course.

The federal government does not take official notice of the presidential election until the current Vice President opens the ballots on January 8th; the court is simply acting on this legal fact.

Only one senator AND only one representative — so start writing yours today! — Use this chart (see link below) and associated info in your message to those folks.

http://theobamafile.com/NaturalBornCitizenChart.htm


11 posted on 12/15/2008 4:52:51 PM PST by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Coachm

It is crap. Should have been handled before he was elected. Possible way out technicality at best. They and others do not want to be labeled ..... inaccurately.


12 posted on 12/15/2008 4:53:54 PM PST by libbylu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

Fear of what?....

A new Fairness Doctrine from Obama and the Dems would put them out of business maybe in jail.


13 posted on 12/15/2008 4:54:31 PM PST by Hang'emAll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Coachm

Must be fear of something that stops them


14 posted on 12/15/2008 4:55:02 PM PST by valkyry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk
“FEAR !!!”
>>>........
fairness doctrine here we come whether they talk about this issue or not.

IMO they have been ordered to stay clear..that is they have been sent a fish wrapped in newspaper as an warning.

15 posted on 12/15/2008 4:55:26 PM PST by shadowgovernment (From the Ashes of a Republican rout will raise a Conservative Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

License renewals, government, plenty of things out there behind the scenes.


16 posted on 12/15/2008 4:55:56 PM PST by Pilated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Zevonismymuse

“The time to raise any issue is during the campaign. To try to make something out of this now is counter productive.”

Excuse me, but that argument is patently absurd.
The states went to a lot of trouble to ratify the 20th amendment in 1933. Further, the Congress went to a lot of trouble to pass 3 USC 15 in 1948. Both of these pieces of work directly address O’s situation and the steps to be taken if someone tries to run a shell game on the nation.

Please see my About page.


17 posted on 12/15/2008 4:59:25 PM PST by frog in a pot (Is there a definition of "domestic enemies" as used in federal oaths, or is that just lip service?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Coachm

Um... Because they think it is stupid?


18 posted on 12/15/2008 5:01:11 PM PST by Poser (Willing to fight for oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frog in a pot
Excuse me, but that argument is patently absurd.

Listen to yourself. Read your own "about" on your profile; you are making my point. You sound like a 9/11 Truther, a sore loser, a nut. This is why none of the conservative leadership is on board.

19 posted on 12/15/2008 5:05:19 PM PST by Zevonismymuse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: IrishCatholic

“So, they wait until it breaks...”

Do you still think that anything is going to “break” in Hussein’s BC affair?

There are certain subjects that Rush, Sean and Levin are not going to touch with a 10-foot pole—this is one of them. Why should they ruin their careers?


20 posted on 12/15/2008 5:06:33 PM PST by 353FMG (The sky is not falling, yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson