Posted on 11/25/2008 3:21:02 PM PST by JoeProBono
Denise Lynch Murters story began last April when her Yorkie named Alex began growling and awoke her from a deep sleep. I thought it was an intruder at first, she said. I went outside and saw it. It was shaped like a boomerang and had three lights like the headlamps of a car up in the sky. Murter believes she saw a UFO outside her Falls home. And so does the Discovery Channel. On Monday night the cable channel aired its special UFOs over Earth and Murter along with her daughter and husband, Dan, tuned in. The topic wasnt the only draw for the Murter family, Denises story was featured on the hour-long show.
(Excerpt) Read more at phillyburbs.com ...
Oh, and happy thanksgiving as well. I am lifting a glass of scotch to you. You are always a passionate and worthy opponent.
Interesting.
Thanks for your Thanksgiving wishes, BTW. Passionate beliefs I seem to have in abundance, alright. Not much luke-warm about me.
1. Insiders have NOT kept their mouths shut—including my relative. However, the well designed and prosecuted disinformation, ridicule etc. efforts along with selected terminations have limited severely any negative fallout from the government’s perspective.
2. Seems to be an arbitrary statement of blind faith in . . . assumption. “Worm holes” is a postulation I’ve never had much confidence in. Other dimensions and various means to warp space/time to arrive here in a timely fashion; coming from a “spiritual” dimension etc. are all viable alternatives.
3. There evidently has been some serious concerns about panic and chaos amongst the populace. Besides, they’ve developed many clever ways to get lots of money—co-opting the drug trade being one of them. And in terms of power—to have technologies AT LEAST 50 years ahead of anyone else kind of handles that nicely. Then there’s the whole globalist power thing working industriously for global government—some say for 400 years . . . consolodating money and power in the hands of 30-50 or so families world wide . . . nice trick.
Interesting.
Thanks for your Thanksgiving wishes, BTW. Passionate beliefs I seem to have in abundance, alright. Not much luke-warm about me.
1. Insiders have NOT kept their mouths shut—including my relative. However, the well designed and prosecuted disinformation, ridicule etc. efforts along with selected terminations have limited severely any negative fallout from the government’s perspective.
2. Seems to be an arbitrary statement of blind faith in . . . assumption. “Worm holes” is a postulation I’ve never had much confidence in. Other dimensions and various means to warp space/time to arrive here in a timely fashion; coming from a “spiritual” dimension etc. are all viable alternatives.
3. There evidently has been some serious concerns about panic and chaos amongst the populace. Besides, they’ve developed many clever ways to get lots of money—co-opting the drug trade being one of them. And in terms of power—to have technologies AT LEAST 50 years ahead of anyone else kind of handles that nicely. Then there’s the whole globalist power thing working industriously for global government—some say for 400 years . . . consolidating money and power in the hands of 30-50 or so families world wide . . . nice trick.
I’m not really sure those points answered my question though.
THOSE items REALLY convince you in your own mind that you know more than the Brazilian Brigadier General about the topic? Still does not seem very logical, to me—even accounting for a trillion tons of bias.
He has a whole intelligence service at his service that you don’t have.
He has lots of in-country connections you evidently don’t have.
He has lots of contacts with peers around the world you evidently don’t have.
Your arbitrary blind faith-in-assumptions position artificially and very unscientifically wipes all that out as though it were nothing.
BUT IT’S NOT nothing!
anducting=abducting
How quickly were they on the scene near Needles Calif a few months ago . . . 17 minutes after the crash?
My relative said they had crash recovery teams that could go
INSTANTLY . . . not at the speed of sound or light but
INSTANTLY
to any spot on the globe.
The fuzzy photo stuff has been explained multiple times.
You’ve still not explained away the General’s not knowing as much as you.
You’ve merely RESTATED an arbitrary
BLIND ASSUMPTIONS ASSERTION OF FAITH
that there are no such essentially because you refuse to believe that there are—evidently for some existential discomfort reason.
Again, the research on abductees and probable abductees has determined that AS A GROUP
they are significantly though slightly ABOVE AVERAGE in sanity.
Governments are easily persuaded—particularly if shown powers and multiple means of terminating the office holders forthwith . . . and . . . as has been threatened off and on from the beginning and evidently occasionally carried out—removing whole families from existence.
Few people want to be responsible for all their relatives being killed.
1. Government teams.
2. No, peer reviewed articles seem to have not a shred of influence on the kind of BLIND FAITH ASSUMPTION sort of perspective you and other naysayers hereon are so given to asserting so reflexively.
I’ve posted an article or two of 3 available of peer reviewed solid scientific agricultural journals about crop circles.
IIRC off the top of my head,
There were 4-5 different replicatable differences quite scientifically verified between aspects, variable within the circles vs outside the circles. A couple of those were demonstrated in the laboratory.
A) The plant nodes appeared to have been expanded, even burst with very very very short bursts of microwave energy or some such. Laboratory experiments in the lab with microwaves did produce very similar results in experimental plants.
B) The soil within the circles was EXTREMELY DRY—VERY EXTREMELY DRY compared to the soil not in the circles.
C) There was a very fine micro-grain dusting of iron particles on the plants and soil in the circles but not outside the circles.
D) Seeds germinated from plants within the circles
-——1. germinated at a different rate
-——2. were more robust in terms of height, general health
-——3. were more resistant to drought conditions.
compared to seed from plants not in the circles.
None of this very scientifically verifiable; peer reviewed; solid scientific journal article stuff influenced the naysayers hereon 0.0000000000000000001%.
The evidence was clearly that they REFUSED to be influenced BY FACTS . . . AT ALL.
Back to BLIND FAITH in an illogical, irrational assumption . . . evidently based on existentialist fear, discomfort or some such.
Back to an automatic super vulnerability to a TYPE II ERROR needlessly, irrationially.
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
I have been wondering . . . were you, in your younger years, ridiculed because of your interest and beliefs about UFO’s etc.?
That coupled with a fierce switch to concluding it was all hoaxed, could leave one with some intense resentment if not bitterness etc. That could influence one’s blind faith assumptions considerably.
You left a number of other possibilities out.
Folks who set themselves up so wholesale for a TYPE II ERROR TRAP tend to do that much above average, in my experience.
Anyway—I do not believe that you will alter your perspective unless and until:
1. you are abducted and remember it in vivid detail
&/or
2. you have a ufo sighting wherein you can touch the craft at close range, if not climb aboard and get off to tell about it.
&/or
3. such are seen routinely on CNN and the nightly news 7/days/week
I believe #3 will occur.
I hope 1 & 2 do not occur.
Blessings,
That sounds wonderful! My husband makes the dressing these days, traditional and yummy, one with oysters.
I understand that version is very delicious . . .
particularly for those who like oysters! LOL.
There are 2 drawbacks from eating out . . . no left-overs and the dressing’s not precisely as one would do it one’s self.
However, no cleanup, either.
Indeed, though I’d rather do the clean-up and be able to linger all day long.
I love that aspect, too.
However, when one’s ‘family’ is so . . . miniscule . . . with very diverse interests, at that . . .
Starting to think about how to convince the church to host some singles and homeless or some such for such dinners.
Though that sure has it’s +’s & -’s too! LOL.
May not be responding as I prefer due to massive computer problems.
Prayers appreciated.
Rushing along at the college.
I agree that the church should plan ahead for the homeless and those who are alone for the Holidays.
Finding the truly selfless souls willing to sacrifice their own family time seems to be too big a challenge in groups calling themselves
“Christian.’
Sad, that.
though family time is squeezed so small alaready, it’s pretty understandable from another perspective.
LUB
Indeed. Sigh...
http://www.earthfiles.com/news.php?ID=1505&category=Environment
More Ohio Eyewitnesses See Glowing Pod Rise Up to Triangle
Interesting.
Thx.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.