To: mysterio
I’m not really sure those points answered my question though.
THOSE items REALLY convince you in your own mind that you know more than the Brazilian Brigadier General about the topic? Still does not seem very logical, to me—even accounting for a trillion tons of bias.
He has a whole intelligence service at his service that you don’t have.
He has lots of in-country connections you evidently don’t have.
He has lots of contacts with peers around the world you evidently don’t have.
Your arbitrary blind faith-in-assumptions position artificially and very unscientifically wipes all that out as though it were nothing.
BUT IT’S NOT nothing!
84 posted on
11/27/2008 2:07:33 PM PST by
Quix
(LAWLESS LEADER QUOTES FM 1900: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
To: Quix
that you know more than the Brazilian Brigadier General about the topic?
I doubt either of us can know much about space monsters, since none are visiting earth. However, when he produces a piece of space monster ship or the corpse of a space monster, I will reconsider my assessment.
Your arbitrary blind faith-in-assumptions position artificially and very unscientifically wipes all that out as though it were nothing.
Someone should produce a clear, undoctored photo, a piece of space monster ship, or a space monster corpse. If they are truly visiting and crashing ships into earth as often as conspiracy buffs would have us believe, it shouldn't be a daunting task.
Conspiracy theorists would have us believe that space monsters are :
1. Visiting earth regularly (and possibly anducting insane people.)
2. Impossible to photograph clearly, and
2.(b) The governments of every nation on the planet have agreed to cover up all evidence of them, and they manage to somehow arrive on the scene of any accident within minutes. Leaving no evidence behind whatsoever.
Sorry, that's just not likely.
85 posted on
11/27/2008 3:34:40 PM PST by
mysterio
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson