[mysterio]

My relative said they had crash recovery teams that could go INSTANTLY . . . not at the speed of sound or light but INSTANTLY to any spot on the globe.

You mean government teams or space monster teams to recover their own?

that there are no such essentially because you refuse to believe that there are—evidently for some existential discomfort reason.

I don't believe aliens are visiting earth. Feel free to produce a piece of ship, a clear photo, or an alien corpse to prove me wrong and instantly become the most famous person in the world.

I recommend you submit your peer reviewed paper to Science or Nature.

[Quix]

1. Government teams.

2. No, peer reviewed articles seem to have not a shred of influence on the kind of BLIND FAITH ASSUMPTION sort of perspective you and other naysayers hereon are so given to asserting so reflexively.

I’ve posted an article or two of 3 available of peer reviewed solid scientific agricultural journals about crop circles.

IIRC off the top of my head,

There were 4-5 different replicatable differences quite scientifically verified between aspects, variable within the circles vs outside the circles. A couple of those were demonstrated in the laboratory.

A) The plant nodes appeared to have been expanded, even burst with very very very short bursts of microwave energy or some such. Laboratory experiments in the lab with microwaves did produce very similar results in experimental plants.

B) The soil within the circles was EXTREMELY DRY—VERY EXTREMELY DRY compared to the soil not in the circles.

C) There was a very fine micro-grain dusting of iron particles on the plants and soil in the circles but not outside the circles.

D) Seeds germinated from plants within the circles

-——1. germinated at a different rate
-——2. were more robust in terms of height, general health
-——3. were more resistant to drought conditions.

compared to seed from plants not in the circles.

None of this very scientifically verifiable; peer reviewed; solid scientific journal article stuff influenced the naysayers hereon 0.0000000000000000001%.

The evidence was clearly that they REFUSED to be influenced BY FACTS . . . AT ALL.

Back to BLIND FAITH in an illogical, irrational assumption . . . evidently based on existentialist fear, discomfort or some such.

Back to an automatic super vulnerability to a TYPE II ERROR needlessly, irrationially.

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

I have been wondering . . . were you, in your younger years, ridiculed because of your interest and beliefs about UFO’s etc.?

That coupled with a fierce switch to concluding it was all hoaxed, could leave one with some intense resentment if not bitterness etc. That could influence one’s blind faith assumptions considerably.