Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What are the Best reasons/arguments to keep marijuana illegal?
National Review ^ | July 29, 2008 | me_a_republic

Posted on 07/29/2008 8:38:33 PM PDT by me_a_republican

Dear fellow forum members,

What are the best reasons or arguments you can think of to keep marijuana illegal?

It would really really help to if you can reply only after reading http://www.nationalreview.com/12feb96/drug.html .

Thank you.


TOPICS: Gardening; Miscellaneous; UFO's
KEYWORDS: 2manydopers; 2manyhippies; 2manystonedpeople; 2muchfuzzythinking; crimination; crosseyedpunk; dope; drugs; marijuana; meafaggot; mealeroy; mestupid; newbie; newbiewithavanity; pagingmrleroy; paultards; postandrun; potdontmakeyoustupid; stoner; troll; trolltimer; vikingkitties; wod; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-247 next last
To: jmc813
None of the potheads I know are successful.

This is literally true

121 posted on 07/30/2008 1:19:53 PM PDT by Soliton (Investigate, study, learn, then express an opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Soliton

None of the potheads I know are successful.
This is literally true
_________

without trying to hard to be a butthead, I’d suggest this says more about the potheads you know than it does about potheads in general.

I think you need to hang with a better class of potheads :-)


122 posted on 07/30/2008 1:22:52 PM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Soliton
This is literally true

Well, you must hang around with a bunch of losers, then. I know a lot of people who almost definitely make more money than you who enjoy partaking.

123 posted on 07/30/2008 1:25:12 PM PDT by jmc813 (Scattered, smothered, covered, diced, chunked)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: dmz
without trying to hard to be a butthead, I’d suggest this says more about the potheads you know than it does about potheads in general.

I think we have a definition problem. Occasional smokers are not potheads. Potheads are people who make pot a critical part of their lives and defend it as if it was a religion.

124 posted on 07/30/2008 1:27:49 PM PDT by Soliton (Investigate, study, learn, then express an opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: dmz

Ha! See #123. Great minds and all.


125 posted on 07/30/2008 1:27:56 PM PDT by jmc813 (Scattered, smothered, covered, diced, chunked)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Soliton
Occasional smokers are not potheads. Potheads are people who make pot a critical part of their lives and defend it as if it was a religion.

Oh. Sorry for the slam there. I guess we actually kinda agree. But I will say, the pot is s symptom, not a cause for those people.

126 posted on 07/30/2008 1:29:09 PM PDT by jmc813 (Scattered, smothered, covered, diced, chunked)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
I know a lot of people who almost definitely make more money than you who enjoy partaking.

I don't recall mentioning how much money I make. Drug dealers and Hollywierd stars make a lot of money, but it doesn't mean they aren't losers.

127 posted on 07/30/2008 1:30:43 PM PDT by Soliton (Investigate, study, learn, then express an opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
But I will say, the pot is s symptom, not a cause for those people.

It is both. Like all vices, it can take over. Stupid people do not get smarter on pot.

128 posted on 07/30/2008 1:33:03 PM PDT by Soliton (Investigate, study, learn, then express an opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster

Uh, dude, your arguments are backwards. Read the headline again.

And for crying out loud, step away from the bong. :-)


129 posted on 07/30/2008 1:46:13 PM PDT by newgeezer (It is [the people's] right and duty to be at all times armed. --Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: All

Sorry, I posted the opposite of what I intended. My post was in answer to making it legal.


130 posted on 07/30/2008 1:47:34 PM PDT by DungeonMaster ("You can't take $100,000,000,000 to Vegas" speculators.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
And for crying out loud, step away from the bong. :-)

Oh wow man...I think...you...might be right dude. huu huu huuu

{bubble bubble bubble phhhhhhhhhhh}

131 posted on 07/30/2008 1:49:24 PM PDT by DungeonMaster ("You can't take $100,000,000,000 to Vegas" speculators.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: jmc813

No, I’ve made my logical arguments in the face of your illogical arguments, and as yet am awaiting anything to the contrary from you. You wish to, instead, employ a “red herring” in place of logical argument.


132 posted on 07/30/2008 2:24:19 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a U.S. Army Soldier soon to be training other Army Soldiers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: jmc813

What difference would it make were any part of my salary to be from “government funding”? Are you thus suggesting I’m biased? I’ll save you the problem of wondering. Yes, I’m biased. I’m biased against the illegal use of recreational drugs and/or prescription drugs. Where my salary comes from has nothing to do with my bias in this area, as I’ve maintained this position from an early age.


133 posted on 07/30/2008 2:28:13 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a U.S. Army Soldier soon to be training other Army Soldiers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: TKDietz
You've heard some reefer madness hype and bought into it hook, line, and sinker. There is no good evidence that marijuana use damages chromosomes and harms reproductive systems and causes messed up children.

I disagree. I've not "heard" any hype. I've read the literature on the subject, and worked with the children of people who abused marijuana and now are dealing with the fact that their children are having problems with learning. If you cared to do your own research on the subject, turning to the reputable sources on the subject, you'd find that your belief that marijuana is harmless is hype.

134 posted on 07/30/2008 2:33:12 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a U.S. Army Soldier soon to be training other Army Soldiers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: me_a_republican
Because thousands of DEA Agents are depending on the income.

L

135 posted on 07/30/2008 2:35:37 PM PDT by Lurker (Islam is an insane death cult. Any other aspects are PR to get them within throat-cutting range.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad

I never said marijuana was harmless. I have read the literature on the subject as well and while it’s not a healthy habit there isn’t good evidence that it damages chromosomes and causes learning problems in children of users. What you are proposing is not the consensus among the scientific community and it runs counter to what I’ve seen with my own two eyes. I’m not buying it. You can believe whatever you want to believe though.


136 posted on 07/30/2008 2:44:00 PM PDT by TKDietz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: me_a_republican; timpad; TBarnett34; MeekOneGOP; PetroniDE; Lady Jag; mhking; glock rocks; ...
Dude!!!!

Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my Viking Kitty/ZOT ping list!. . . don't be shy.

137 posted on 07/30/2008 3:08:04 PM PDT by darkwing104 (Lets get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: me_a_republican

What are the Best reasons/arguments to keep marijuana illegal?

What else would we do with the drug enforcement industrial complex?


138 posted on 07/30/2008 3:10:56 PM PDT by rottndog (Government is a necessary evil, but as with all evils, the less of it the better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: me_a_republican

It makes people stupid and we already have enough democrats.


139 posted on 07/30/2008 3:11:16 PM PDT by KSCITYBOY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: me_a_republican

140 posted on 07/30/2008 3:12:27 PM PDT by reagan_fanatic ("And how can this be? For I am the Kwisatz Haderach! " - Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-247 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson