To: ShadowAce
Application of technologies developed for computers in other areas.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I don’t get the advangage. Say you have a lense 20/20 cm. You concentrate the energy falling onto 400 sq cm into a smaller area. But then you throw away a lot of that energy with the “clever” cooling technology so, what’s the point?
4 posted on
05/15/2008 1:35:23 PM PDT by
DManA
To: All
![](http://media.marketwire.com/attachments/200805/TN-434453_CPV1.jpg)
IBM researchers have achieved a breakthrough in photovoltaics technology that could significantly reduce the cost of harnessing the Sun's power for electricity.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
6 posted on
05/15/2008 1:36:31 PM PDT by
Captain Beyond
(The Hammer of the gods! (Just a cool line from a Led Zep song))
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
...enough heat to melt stainless steel,... IMPOSSIBLE!!!!!! Rosie told me that can't be done.
7 posted on
05/15/2008 1:37:55 PM PDT by
ladtx
( "Never miss a good chance to shut up." - - Will Rogers)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Sure, 1600 celsius, but if you stick on of these on it, it practically room temperature!
![](http://images.tigerdirect.com/skuimages/large/T925-2106-main.jpg)
10 posted on
05/15/2008 1:41:40 PM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(Et si omnes ego non)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The lens used to magnify the sun would have to be light weight. A Fresno method comes to mind. The collector would need to be cleaned periodically. A large application would put people to work cleaning solar collectors.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Google paid nine figures for the development of solar cells that cost only $1 a watt, IBM paid for the most concentrated cells ever, T. Boone is taking the largest wind farm in the world online with 4 GW in three years.
And the left says government is necessary to advance the state of the art in renewable energy to save us from Global Warming. What has the government given us? Economic waste, plans that hurt more than they help. What has private industry given us? See above.
American ingenuity rules.
To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...
18 posted on
05/15/2008 2:48:02 PM PDT by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
" to cool the solar cell from greater than 1600 degrees Celsius to just 85 degrees Celsius. "
Call me naive, but, that is impressive.
To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Fred Nerks; george76; justiceseeker93; ...
Note: this topic is from May 2008.
Thanks Ernest.
The trick lies in IBM's ability to cool the tiny solar cell. Concentrating the equivalent of 2000 suns on such a small area generates enough heat to melt stainless steel, something the researchers experienced first hand in their experiments. But by borrowing innovations from its own R&D in cooling computer chips, the team was able to cool the solar cell from greater than 1600 degrees Celsius to just 85 degrees Celsius.
Of course, this is done (mostly) at the expense of the other cells which would have received those rays and generated power. :')
31 posted on
04/06/2009 1:15:32 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson